Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ADM Archer Daniels MidlandOpen in the cockpit ↗

Archer Daniels MidlandADMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Staples›Agricultural Commodities/Milling

Processes and trades agricultural commodities—oilseeds, corn, wheat—into food, feed and industrial ingredients globally.

Momentum weak 30
Mkt cap
$33.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$251M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.9 pp
WACC 7.4%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A / AA-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
81 days
26 Jan 2027
Close · USD$69.97
1D-0.7%
1W-9.0%
1M-15.1%
3M-13.1%
6M-9.3%
YTD+23.4%
1Y+27.1%
ATR %3.2%
Beta-0.07
52w lowhigh21.2% off high

What Archer Daniels Midland does

Processes and trades agricultural commodities—oilseeds, corn, wheat—into food, feed and industrial ingredients globally.

Earns by buying crops from farmers, then crushing, milling and shipping them for a margin, so profit depends on the gap between crop and product prices (the crush margin) and on moving grain through its storage and shipping network. Biofuel feedstock follows energy policy. It is one of a handful of firms alongside Cargill, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus that dominate grain trade.

Products and services

  • Ag Services and Oilseeds (origination, crushing)
  • Carbohydrate Solutions (corn processing, ethanol)
  • Nutrition (ingredients, flavors)

Customers

  • Food and beverage manufacturers
  • Animal feed producers
  • Biofuel blenders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Agriculture
  • Ag commodity processing/trading
  • Grain origination, crushing and…

What could go right

  • Biofuel/renewable diesel feedstock demand
  • Global food demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Commodity price/crush-margin volatility
  • Past accounting/regulatory scrutiny

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Global grain-handling and processing network scale is expensive to replicate.

Headquarters: Chicago, Illinois, US · Founded: 1902 · Employees: 41,496

Named competitors

Archer Daniels Midland at a glance

Size Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) is a United States Consumer Staples company (Agricultural Commodities/Milling) with a market value of $33.3B, the 333rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $69.97 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.3%, against -1.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 2.8% (peer median 3.3%).

Valuation It trades at 12.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.2× (3rd cheapest of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points below its cost of capital (7.4% WACC).

Credit Archer Daniels Midland has 17 bonds outstanding ($7.38B), rated A by the agencies and trading like AA- at a weighted spread of 64 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101ADM 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Archer Daniels Midland against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Archer Daniels Midland financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$84.1B$80.3B$85.5B$94.0B$102B
Revenue growth—-6%-9%-8%—
Gross profit$6.16B$4.11B$5.56B$6.28B$7.01B
EBITDA$3.55B$1.98B$3.35B$3.94B$4.71B
Net income$2.48B$1.08B$1.80B$3.48B$4.34B
Free cash flow$346M$4.20B$1.23B$2.97B$2.16B
Capital expenditure$1.13B$1.25B$1.56B$1.49B$1.32B
Total debt$10.1B$9.76B$11.5B$9.60B$10.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Archer Daniels Midland competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%+20%2714600887BG300498F34002311SALMADM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Archer Daniels Midland is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%10×15×20×600887BGF34002311SALMADMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Archer Daniels Midland is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+5%+10%+15%0%5%10%15%600887002311SALMADMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Archer Daniels Midland is the large dot.

Archer Daniels Midland competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ADM vs BG vs INGR vs F34.SI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Archer Daniels Midland ADM$33.3B-9%+1%3%12.0×8.0%
Bunge Global BG$19.0B-20%+55%4%9.2×n/a
Ingredion INGR$5.78B-15%-1%12%9.7×-7.8%
Wilmar International F34.SI$14.5B-19%+6%3%10.2×n/a
Andersons ANDE$1.87B-23%-4%1%8.7×n/a
Tate & Lyle TATE.L$3.34B+53%+16%9%15.2×10.8%
Darling Ingredients DAR$7.92B-20%+16%9%7.3×9.0%
Green Plains GPRE$927M-27%-22%7%7.4×-1.0%

How Archer Daniels Midland compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Archer Daniels Midland against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureADMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.1%+4.8%2nd lowest of 8
6-month return-9.3%-1.3%4th lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-21.2%-18.6%4th lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.0%+6.3%3rd lowest of 8
Operating margin2.8%3.3%3rd lowest of 8
Forward P/E12.0×19.2×3rd cheapest of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.0%-0.1%most demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.5%+16.3%2nd lowest of 4
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.4 pp-12.8 ppmost demanding of 4
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.9 pp+0.3 pp4th lowest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×4.1×least indebted of 4
Bond spread64 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Archer Daniels Midland ADMUnited States$33.3B-9%+1%3%12.0×8.0%+4.5%
Muyuan Foods 2714.HKHong Kong$33.4B-12%-14%-4%n/an/an/a
Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial 600887.SSChina$29.3B+15%+2%9%19.2×-0.1%+3.7%
Bunge Global BGUnited States$19.0B-20%+55%4%9.2×n/an/a
Wen's Foodstuff 300498.SZChina$16.7B+2%-5%-4%n/an/an/a
Wilmar International F34.SISingapore$14.5B-19%+6%3%10.2×n/an/a
Guangdong Haid 002311.SZChina$12.1B-1%+8%3%21.1×-1.1%+16.3%
SalMar SALM.OLNorway$8.35B+5%+14%19%22.2×3.5%+16.3%

Archer Daniels Midland bonds and credit

Archer Daniels Midland has 17 bonds outstanding with $7.38B face value. The agencies rate it A; its bonds trade like AA-. Weighted yield 5.51%, a spread of 64 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Archer Daniels Midland's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bunge Global (BG), Cargill (private or unlisted), Louis Dreyfus Company (private or unlisted), Ingredion (INGR), Wilmar International (F34.SI), Andersons (ANDE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Muyuan Foods (2714.HK), Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial (600887.SS), Bunge Global (BG), Wen's Foodstuff (300498.SZ), Wilmar International (F34.SI), Guangdong Haid (002311.SZ).
Is Archer Daniels Midland expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.0× against a peer median of 19.2×, 3rd cheapest of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Archer Daniels Midland stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.3% against -1.3% for the median peer; over one year +27.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.