Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GPRE Green Plains Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Green Plains Inc.GPRECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Produces ethanol and high-protein animal feed and corn oil from corn at Midwest biorefineries, pivoting toward low-carbon fuels.

Momentum weak 24
Mkt cap
$927M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.3 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
91 days
5 Feb 2027
Close · USD$13.23
1D-3.4%
1W-6.2%
1M-12.2%
3M-12.3%
6M-27.3%
YTD+35.0%
1Y+17.3%
ATR %4.6%
Beta0.00
52w lowhigh32.6% off high

What Green Plains does

Produces ethanol and high-protein animal feed and corn oil from corn at Midwest biorefineries, pivoting toward low-carbon fuels.

Buys corn and sells ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil, so profit depends on the gap between those products' prices and the cost of corn and natural gas rather than on volume. It has been reshaping toward higher-protein feed and low-carbon fuel production that can qualify for US tax credits.

Products and services

  • Ethanol production
  • High-protein animal feed
  • Corn oil

Customers

  • Fuel blenders/refiners
  • Animal feed distributors for aquaculture and lives

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Chemicals: Specialty
  • Corn ethanol and biorefining

What could go right

  • Low-carbon fuel credit programs
  • High-protein feed premium pricing

What could go wrong

  • Corn price and ethanol margin volatility
  • EV transition reducing long-term gasoline blending demand

Moat: narrow (process know-how, scale). Proprietary fermentation technology yields higher-protein feed co-products, but ethanol remains a commodity business.

Headquarters: Omaha, Nebraska, US · Founded: 2004 · Employees: 642

Named competitors

Green Plains at a glance

Size Green Plains (GPRE) is a United States Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $927M, the 2297th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $13.23 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.3%, against -25.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 21.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 7.0% (peer median 5.7%).

Valuation It trades at 7.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.5× (cheapest of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.3 points above its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 18.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 5 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026GPRE 77Peer median 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Green Plains against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Green Plains financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.88B$2.10B$2.45B$3.30B$3.66B
Revenue growth—-14%-26%-10%—
Gross profit$221M$44.1M$58.9M$50.8M$93.4M
EBITDA$227M$38.4M$31.5M$15.7M$67.2M
Net income$124M-$121M-$82.5M-$93.4M-$127M
Free cash flow$118M$64.4M-$127M-$51.7M-$143M
Capital expenditure$26.5M$37.2M$95.1M$108M$212M
Total debt$549M$465M$649M$677M$711M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Green Plains competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%600078605183300429300834301683603213002886000510301209300829300109CMPSUDARSCHEMTTI3011906030100008183788GPRE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Green Plains is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×100×200×300×002886301209300829300109CMPSUDARSCHEM600955GPRERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Green Plains is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%600078605183300429300834603213002886301209300109CMPSUDARSCHEM000818GPREGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Green Plains is the large dot.

Green Plains competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GPRE vs REX vs ADM)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Green Plains GPRE$927M-27%-22%7%7.4×-1.0%
REX American Resources REX$1.31B-21%+6%15%26.2×-3.8%
Archer Daniels Midland ADM$33.3B-9%+1%3%12.0×8.0%

How Green Plains compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Green Plains against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGPREPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-11.5%11th highest of 21
6-month return-27.3%-25.4%9th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-32.6%-44.9%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-21.5%+6.3%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin7.0%5.7%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E7.4×27.5×cheapest of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.0%23.4%least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.8%+3.9%3rd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.7 pp+15.9 pp3rd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.3 pp-3.5 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA5.4×11.5×cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×1.1×3rd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Green Plains GPREUnited States$927M-27%-22%7%7.4×-1.0%+1.8%
Jiangsu Chengxing Phosph-Chemicals 600078.SSChina$928M-29%+27%13%n/a2.6%+2.9%
Quechen Silicon Chemical 605183.SSChina$926M-12%+7%19%n/a2.0%+16.1%
Changzhou Tronly New Electronic Materials 300429.SZChina$923M-37%+14%-14%n/a56.6%+5.0%
Rastar Environmental Protection Materials 300834.SZChina$933M-9%-23%1%n/a43.9%0.0%
Guangzhou Human New Material Science & Technology 301683.SZChina$918M-25%+20%38%n/a11.3%n/a
Zhejiang Oceanking Development 603213.SSChina$938M+1%-17%0%n/a38.3%+17.9%
Shenzhen Wote Advanced Materials 002886.SZChina$906M-15%+10%4%68.2×31.3%+12.2%
Sichuan Xinjinlu 000510.SZChina$906M-32%-4%-15%n/an/an/a
Longkou Union Chemical 301209.SZChina$904M-39%-3%9%336.5×36.9%+1.6%
Henan Jindan Lactic Acid Technology 300829.SZChina$900M+52%+5%3%26.1×n/an/a
Boai NKY Medical 300109.SZChina$896M-32%-17%15%32.5×19.9%+3.9%
Compass Minerals International CMPUnited States$962M-18%+5%8%20.0×8.1%+2.8%
Guangdong Sinoplast Adv Matl 301686.SZChina$962Mn/a+7%19%n/an/an/a
Sudarshan Chemical Industries SUDARSCHEM.NSIndia$893M+10%+90%4%28.9×27.0%+39.5%
TETRA Technologies TTIUnited States$891M-39%+6%7%19.9×n/an/a
Lihuayi Weiyuan Chemical 600955.SSChina$978M-39%+18%-8%17.7×n/an/a
Jiujiang Shanshui Technology 301190.SZChina$983M+32%+54%19%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Wansheng 603010.SSChina$872M-25%+19%-26%n/an/an/a
Hangjin Technology 000818.SZChina$988M-35%-29%-8%n/a18.9%+3.2%
Hanking Gold International 3788.HKHong Kong$862M-26%-19%8%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Green Plains's main competitors?
Named competitors: REX American Resources (REX), Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiangsu Chengxing Phosph-Chemicals (600078.SS), Quechen Silicon Chemical (605183.SS), Changzhou Tronly New Electronic Materials (300429.SZ), Rastar Environmental Protection Materials (300834.SZ), Guangzhou Human New Material Science & Technology (301683.SZ), Zhejiang Oceanking Development (603213.SS).
Is Green Plains expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.4× against a peer median of 27.5×, cheapest of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Green Plains stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.3% against -25.4% for the median peer; over one year +17.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.