Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9879.HK Migao Group Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Migao Group Holdings Limited9879.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Materials›Chemicals: Agricultural

Chinese and Canadian potash-based fertilizer producer and distributor, serving China's agricultural market.

Momentum leader 83
Mkt cap
$1.08B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
26%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$534,902
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
10.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.3 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
-26 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
20 days
26 Nov 2026
Close · HKDHK$9.31
1D-0.9%
1W-1.0%
1M+2.8%
3M-1.0%
6M+15.8%
YTD+16.4%
1Y+44.1%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh4.7% off high

What Migao does

Chinese and Canadian potash-based fertilizer producer and distributor, serving China's agricultural market.

Products and services

  • Potassium sulfate fertilizer
  • Compound/blended fertilizers

Customers

  • Chinese farmers & agricultural distributors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Agricultural chemicals
  • Potash-based compound fertilizer…
  • Distribution to Chinese farmers

What could go right

  • China specialty crop fertilizer demand

What could go wrong

  • Potash price cyclicality
  • Currency exposure (CAD/CNY)

Moat: none (scale). Commodity potash fertilizer producer competing on cost and distribution reach.

Headquarters: Chengdu, China · Employees: 414

Named competitors

Migao at a glance

Size Migao (9879.HK) is a Hong Kong Materials company (Chemicals: Agricultural) with a market value of $1.08B, the 576th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$9.31 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 15.8%, against -23.5% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 27.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.2%); the operating margin is 7.7% (peer median 6.0%).

Valuation It trades at 10.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.3× (7th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +23%, so the hurdle is -26 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.3 points above its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269879.HK 116Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Migao against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Migao financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$6.81BHK$6.78BHK$5.36BHK$4.12BHK$5.39B
Revenue growth—+27%+30%-24%—
Gross profitHK$730MHK$728MHK$693MHK$586MHK$850M
EBITDAHK$564MHK$542MHK$504MHK$440MHK$673M
Net incomeHK$413MHK$410MHK$332MHK$276MHK$463M
Free cash flowHK$118MHK$116M-HK$20.9M-HK$508M-HK$10.7M
Capital expenditureHK$112MHK$110MHK$129MHK$11.7MHK$149M
Total debtn/aHK$1.49BHK$1.16BHK$834MHK$735M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Migao competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-10%0%+10%39830297600389UAN3016651722000525OCIEIDPARRYODCMBAPL002588603299NUFFMC3005050020040024700022179879.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Migao is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%20×40×60×39830297600389UAN3016651722002588603299NUFFMC9879.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Migao is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-25%0%25%50%0297UAN3016651722000525ODCNUFFMC0020040022179879.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Migao is the large dot.

Migao competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9879.HK vs 0297.HK vs 1866.HK vs NTR.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Migao 9879.HK$1.08B+16%+27%8%10.3×-2.8%
Sinofert 0297.HK$1.08B-25%+16%6%5.5×-18.5%
China XLX Fertiliser 1866.HK$1.51B-27%+24%8%6.7×n/a
Nutrien NTR.TO$34.3B+8%+8%14%13.2×4.1%
ICL ICL$6.04B-27%+11%11%11.5×3.5%

How Migao compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Migao against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9879.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.8%-4.6%5th highest of 21
6-month return+15.8%-23.5%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-4.7%-37.9%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+27.0%+8.2%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin7.7%6.0%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E10.3×9.3×7th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.8%-1.7%5th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+23.4%+3.5%highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-26.2 pp-6.3 ppleast demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.3 pp+0.1 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA15.2×8.2×3rd most expensive of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×0.0×4th least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Migao 9879.HKHong Kong$1.08B+16%+27%8%10.3×-2.8%+23.4%
China BlueChemical 3983.HKHong Kong$1.08B-32%+4%5%6.0×n/an/a
Sinofert 0297.HKHong Kong$1.08B-25%+16%6%5.5×-18.5%+1.0%
Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemicals 600389.SSChina$1.04B-44%+13%6%10.4×n/an/a
CVR Partners, LP UANUnited States$1.16B-13%+7%21%7.4×-10.5%+11.6%
CAC Nantong Chemical 301665.SZChina$1.17B-26%+27%13%15.8×-1.7%+11.9%
Taiwan Fertilizer 1722.TWTaiwan$1.18B-15%+4%-16%13.7×0.0%+3.5%
Nanjing Redsun 000525.SZChina$981M-10%+12%-2%n/a12.2%-5.1%
Oci OCI.ASNetherlands$967M+8%-81%-4%n/an/an/a
E.I.D.-Parry (India) EIDPARRY.NSIndia$1.21B-24%+16%7%11.4×n/an/a
Oil-Dri Corporation of America ODCUnited States$948M-9%+2%14%n/a3.8%+10.1%
Madhya Bharat Agro Products MBAPL.NSIndia$944M+68%+48%10%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Noposion Crop Science 002215.SZChina$1.25B-23%+12%13%9.3×-3.9%+6.9%
Stanley Agricultural 002588.SZChina$1.27B-33%+3%8%8.8×n/an/a
Jiang Su Suyan Jingshen 603299.SSChina$1.28B-18%-5%5%25.9×n/an/a
Nufarm NUF.AXAustralia$897M+40%-2%3%62.4×9.9%+5.2%
FMC FMCUnited States$876M-58%-22%-21%6.2×-2.8%-5.7%
Kunming Chuan Jin Nuo Chemical 300505.SZChina$838M-34%+14%10%9.2×n/an/a
Huapont Life Sciences 002004.SZChina$1.39B-5%-6%11%n/a-8.7%+1.1%
Kingenta Ecological Engineering 002470.SZChina$827M-39%+9%-5%n/an/an/a
Holitech Technology 002217.SZChina$1.41B-58%+17%2%n/a45.7%-37.1%

Questions

Who are Migao's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sinofert Holdings (0297.HK), China XLX Fertiliser (1866.HK), Nutrien (NTR.TO), ICL Group (ICL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes China BlueChemical (3983.HK), Sinofert (0297.HK), Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemicals (600389.SS), CVR Partners, LP (UAN), CAC Nantong Chemical (301665.SZ), Taiwan Fertilizer (1722.TW).
Is Migao expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 10.3× against a peer median of 9.3×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +23%, so the hurdle is -26 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Migao stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +15.8% against -23.5% for the median peer; over one year +44.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.