Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002588.SZ Stanley Agricultural Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Stanley Agricultural Group Co., Ltd. Class A002588.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Chemicals: Agricultural

Shandong maker of high-tower compound fertilizers sold under the Stanley brand, with phosphate chemicals upstream in Hubei.

Momentum weak 26
Mkt cap
$1.27B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.20M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.8 pp
WACC 5.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
161 days
16 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥7.38
1D-0.7%
1W+5.6%
1M-1.3%
3M-17.8%
6M-32.5%
YTD-26.1%
1Y-23.4%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh39.6% off high

What Stanley Agricultural does

Shandong maker of high-tower compound fertilizers sold under the Stanley brand, with phosphate chemicals upstream in Hubei.

Sells compound fertilizers, blends of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, in large volumes to farmers through dealers under the Stanley brand. It has pushed upstream into its own phosphate chemicals, which supply its fertilizer plants. Earnings follow fertilizer demand and raw-material costs.

Products and services

  • High-tower compound fertilizers
  • Other compound and specialty fertilizers
  • Phosphate chemicals (monoammonium phosphate)

Customers

  • Farmers, via dealers and distributors
  • Agricultural retailers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Agricultural inputs
  • Fertilizers
  • Compound fertilizer (NPK)

What could go right

  • Upstream phosphate production in Hubei and Hebei

What could go wrong

  • Raw-material price swings (phosphate, potash, urea)
  • Farm-demand cycles and policy

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Established brand and dealer network, but compound fertilizer is a crowded, price-driven market.

Headquarters: Linyi, China · Employees: 4,328

Named competitors

Stanley Agricultural at a glance

Size Stanley Agricultural (002588.SZ) is a China Materials company (Chemicals: Agricultural) with a market value of $1.27B, the 1875th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥7.38 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.5%, against -24.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.4%); the operating margin is 7.8% (peer median 7.2%).

Valuation It trades at 8.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 10.9× (6th cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points above its cost of capital (5.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 77002588.SZ 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Stanley Agricultural against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Stanley Agricultural financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥12.0BCN¥12.3BCN¥10.2BCN¥9.98BCN¥9.03B
Revenue growth—+20%+2%+11%—
Gross profitCN¥2.46BCN¥2.13BCN¥1.72BCN¥1.65BCN¥1.19B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.42BCN¥938MCN¥802MCN¥501M
Net incomeCN¥868MCN¥1.03BCN¥826MCN¥701MCN¥441M
Free cash flow-CN¥785MCN¥683M-CN¥309M-CN¥965MCN¥1.42B
Capital expenditureCN¥588MCN¥647MCN¥979MCN¥2.17BCN¥526M
Total debtCN¥2.36BCN¥3.16BCN¥2.96BCN¥2.69BCN¥1.43B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Stanley Agricultural competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-10%0%603299002215EIDPARRY1722002004UAN0022170021701866987939830297DEEPAKFERTPARADEEP600389BAYERCROP000422ATULTATACHEM002588.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Stanley Agricultural is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%0×25×50×75×603299002215EIDPARRY1722301665UAN0021701866987939830297PARADEEPBAYERCROP000422ATULTATACHEM002588.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Stanley Agricultural is the large dot.

Stanley Agricultural competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002588.SZ vs 002470.SZ vs 000902.SZ vs 600096.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Stanley Agricultural 002588.SZ$1.27B-33%+3%8%8.8×n/a
Kingenta Ecological Engineering 002470.SZ$827M-39%+9%-5%n/an/a
YONFER Agricultural Technology 000902.SZ$2.69B-2%+15%11%11.4×n/a
Yunnan Yuntianhua 600096.SS$7.17B-28%-19%11%9.3×-1.7%
Shenzhen Batian Ecological Technique 002170.SZ$1.44B-29%+3%23%7.1×-8.1%

How Stanley Agricultural compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Stanley Agricultural against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002588.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.3%-8.0%7th highest of 21
6-month return-32.5%-24.6%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-39.6%-33.8%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+13.4%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.8%7.2%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.8×10.9×6th cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.8 pp+0.5 pp7th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Stanley Agricultural 002588.SZChina$1.27B-33%+3%8%8.8×n/an/a
Jiang Su Suyan Jingshen 603299.SSChina$1.28B-18%-5%5%25.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Noposion Crop Science 002215.SZChina$1.25B-23%+12%13%9.3×-3.9%+6.9%
E.I.D.-Parry (India) EIDPARRY.NSIndia$1.21B-24%+16%7%11.4×n/an/a
Taiwan Fertilizer 1722.TWTaiwan$1.18B-15%+4%-16%13.7×0.0%+3.5%
Huapont Life Sciences 002004.SZChina$1.39B-5%-6%11%n/a-8.7%+1.1%
CAC Nantong Chemical 301665.SZChina$1.17B-26%+27%13%15.8×-1.7%+11.9%
CVR Partners, LP UANUnited States$1.16B-13%+7%21%7.4×-10.5%+11.6%
Holitech Technology 002217.SZChina$1.41B-58%+17%2%n/a45.7%-37.1%
Shenzhen Batian Ecological Technique 002170.SZChina$1.44B-29%+3%23%7.1×-8.1%+18.8%
China XLX Fertiliser 1866.HKHong Kong$1.51B-27%+24%8%6.7×n/an/a
Migao 9879.HKHong Kong$1.08B+16%+27%8%10.3×-2.8%+23.4%
China BlueChemical 3983.HKHong Kong$1.08B-32%+4%5%6.0×n/an/a
Sinofert 0297.HKHong Kong$1.08B-25%+16%6%5.5×-18.5%+1.0%
Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals DEEPAKFERT.NSIndia$1.54B-14%+14%13%10.1×n/an/a
Paradeep Phosphates PARADEEP.NSIndia$1.57B+12%+31%7%17.6×n/an/a
Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemicals 600389.SSChina$1.04B-44%+13%6%10.4×n/an/a
Bayer Cropscience India BAYERCROP.NSIndia$1.58B-28%-5%15%19.5×16.1%+5.9%
Hubei Yihua Chemical Industry 000422.SZChina$1.60B-42%+15%5%15.2×n/an/a
Atul ATUL.NSIndia$1.63B-26%+18%12%19.7×18.2%+11.0%
Tata Chemicals TATACHEM.NSIndia$1.64B-25%+2%3%85.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Stanley Agricultural's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kingenta Ecological Engineering (002470.SZ), Xinyangfeng Agricultural (000902.SZ), Yuntianhua (600096.SS), Batian Ecological Engineering (002170.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiang Su Suyan Jingshen (603299.SS), Shenzhen Noposion Crop Science (002215.SZ), E.I.D.-Parry (India) (EIDPARRY.NS), Taiwan Fertilizer (1722.TW), Huapont Life Sciences (002004.SZ), CAC Nantong Chemical (301665.SZ).
Is Stanley Agricultural expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.8× against a peer median of 10.9×, 6th cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has Stanley Agricultural stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.5% against -24.6% for the median peer; over one year -23.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.