Loading…

Mitsubishi Corp8058.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Japan's largest sogo shosha (general trading house), with businesses spanning energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, food and consumer retail worldwide.

≈ A Japanese conglomerate akin to a trading-and-investment version of Berkshire HathawayMomentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$105B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
83%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$328M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-5.4 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
+11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A / AA-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥4,958
1D-6.0%
1W+1.0%
1M+5.2%
3M+3.6%
6M-0.6%
YTD+39.6%
1Y+36.3%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh17.5% off high

What Mitsubishi does

Japan's largest sogo shosha (general trading house), with businesses spanning energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, food and consumer retail worldwide.

Most of its profit comes not from trading commissions but from its share of profits and dividends of businesses and projects it holds stakes in, such as LNG ventures, mines and Lawson convenience stores. This makes its earnings track commodity prices. Berkshire Hathaway has held a stake since 2020.

In one line: A Japanese conglomerate akin to a trading-and-investment version of Berkshire Hathaway.

Products and services

  • Natural gas/LNG & energy investments
  • Metals & mineral resources
  • Machinery, chemicals & food distribution
  • Consumer retail (Lawson convenience stores)

Customers

  • Global industrial, energy and consumer end markets

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • General trading/investment conglomerate
  • Trading + resource investment +…

What could go right

  • Commodity price cycles (LNG, metals)
  • Lawson retail expansion

What could go wrong

  • Commodity price downturns
  • Resource investment write-down risk

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Vast global trading/logistics network and long-term resource equity stakes built over a century.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1950 · Employees: 63,037

Named competitors

Mitsubishi at a glance

Size Mitsubishi (8058.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $105B, the 14th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,958 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.6%, against +1.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.5%); the operating margin is 2.9% (peer median 9.6%).

Valuation It trades at 14.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (4th most expensive of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.4 points below its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Credit Mitsubishi has 5 bonds outstanding ($2.51B), rated A by the agencies and trading like AA- at a weighted spread of 80 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268058.T 95Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Mitsubishi against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Mitsubishi financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥20.7T¥18.9T¥18.6T¥19.6T¥21.6T
Revenue growth—+2%-5%-9%—
Gross profit¥1.92T¥1.66T¥1.84T¥2.36T¥2.56T
EBITDA¥1.07T¥816B¥842B¥1.27T¥1.54T
Net income¥1.06T¥800B¥951B¥964B¥1.18T
Free cash flow¥1.62T¥1.14T¥1.27T¥827B¥1.48T
Capital expenditure¥428B¥353B¥384B¥521B¥455B
Total debt¥6.85T¥6.51T¥5.34T¥5.69T¥6.56T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mitsubishi competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%+10%GLENGWWFAST8053FERG60399380158058.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mitsubishi is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×40×GLENGWWFAST8053FERG60399380158058.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mitsubishi is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%GWWFAST8053FERG60399380158058.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mitsubishi is the large dot.

Mitsubishi competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (8058.T vs 8031.T vs 8053.T vs 8001.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mitsubishi 8058.T$105B-1%+16%3%14.8×18.8%
Mitsui & 8031.T$82.4B-22%+10%3%12.7×n/a
Sumitomo 8053.T$47.7B+9%+6%5%11.3×15.2%
Itochu 8001.T$111B+16%+6%5%15.8×18.1%
Marubeni 8002.T$49.7B-22%+14%4%12.3×17.7%

How Mitsubishi compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mitsubishi against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8058.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.2%-8.3%3rd highest of 8
6-month return-0.6%+1.5%4th lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-17.5%-17.8%4th highest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.6%+13.5%4th highest of 8
Operating margin2.9%9.6%2nd lowest of 8
Forward P/E14.8×13.0×4th most expensive of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.8%10.9%most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.0%+9.3%2nd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.8 pp+2.0 ppmost demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.4 pp+9.7 pplowest of 8
EV / EBITDA20.8×18.5×2nd most expensive of 6
Net debt / EBITDA4.7×1.9×2nd most indebted of 7
Bond spread80 bp83 bp3rd tightest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mitsubishi 8058.TJapan$105B-1%+16%3%14.8×18.8%+8.0%
Glencore GLEN.LUnited Kingdom$78.0B-14%+27%2%10.9×n/an/a
W. W. Grainger GWWUnited States$67.9B+17%+9%17%28.2×11.9%+8.7%
Fastenal FASTUnited States$60.8B+20%+14%21%38.3×14.2%+7.7%
Sumitomo 8053.TJapan$47.7B+9%+6%5%11.3×15.2%+9.5%
Ferguson Enterprises FERGUnited States$45.2B-3%+8%10%19.4×9.9%+9.1%
CMOC 603993.SSChina$41.0B-29%+32%20%8.7×-5.4%+12.8%
Toyota Tsusho 8015.TJapan$36.8B+2%+25%5%13.0×9.8%+12.9%

Mitsubishi bonds and credit

Mitsubishi has 5 bonds outstanding with $2.51B face value. The agencies rate it A; its bonds trade like AA-. Weighted yield 4.62%, a spread of 80 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Mitsubishi's main competitors?
Named competitors: Mitsui & Co (8031.T), Sumitomo Corp (8053.T), Itochu Corp (8001.T), Marubeni Corp (8002.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Glencore (GLEN.L), W. W. Grainger (GWW), Fastenal (FAST), Sumitomo (8053.T), Ferguson Enterprises (FERG), CMOC (603993.SS).
Is Mitsubishi expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.8× against a peer median of 13.0×, 4th most expensive of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Mitsubishi stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.6% against +1.5% for the median peer; over one year +36.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.