Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8050.T Seiko Group CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Seiko Group Corporation8050.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Specialties

Makes Seiko-brand watches and clocks, plus optical and electronic devices.

≈ A watchmaker like a smaller Fossil Group with instruments heritageMomentum leader 87
Mkt cap
$4.71B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
61%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$30.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
21.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.6 pp
WACC 13.2%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥8,986
1D-10.8%
1W-19.2%
1M-20.0%
3M+5.5%
6M+54.1%
YTD+146.9%
1Y+152.1%
ATR %7.1%
52w lowhigh24.6% off high

What Seiko does

Makes Seiko-brand watches and clocks, plus optical and electronic devices.

Sells watches through department stores, watch retailers and its own boutiques, with the Seiko brand supplying the volume and Grand Seiko, made a separate brand in 2017, the higher-priced end. Unusually, it makes its own watch movements, the mechanisms inside.

In one line: A watchmaker like a smaller Fossil Group with instruments heritage.

Products and services

  • Seiko watches
  • Clocks
  • Optical/electronic devices

Customers

  • Retail watch consumers globally

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer goods
  • Watch & precision device manufacturing
  • Watches, clocks, optical devices

What could go right

  • Global watch brand demand

What could go wrong

  • Smartphone/smartwatch substitution risk

Moat: narrow (brand, process know-how). Century-old Seiko brand and in-house watchmaking movement technology.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1881 · Employees: 11,326

Named competitors

Seiko at a glance

Size Seiko (8050.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Specialties) with a market value of $4.71B, the 253rd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥8,986 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 54.1%, against +0.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.0%); the operating margin is 10.7% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 21.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.2× (7th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 24% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points below its cost of capital (13.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20268050.T 155Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Seiko against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Seiko financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥358B¥336B¥305B¥277B¥261B
Revenue growth—+10%+10%+6%—
Gross profit¥167B¥155B¥137B¥123B¥112B
EBITDA¥53.1B¥46.4B¥37.0B¥29.2B¥24.8B
Net income¥26.8B¥22.0B¥13.3B¥10.1B¥5.03B
Free cash flown/a¥27.1B¥22.2B¥21.7B-¥2.92B
Capital expendituren/a¥13.9B¥10.4B¥11.0B¥12.2B
Total debt¥105B¥107B¥118B¥127B¥140B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Seiko competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%+40%61811910PNDORA600612UHR600916PCJEWELLERSKYGOLDSISTHANGAMAYL25853011778050.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Seiko is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×50×100×61811910PNDORA600612UHR600916SKYGOLDSISTHANGAMAYL3011778050.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Seiko is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%1910PNDORA600612UHR600916SIS1929THANGAMAYL8050.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Seiko is the large dot.

Seiko competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (8050.T vs 7762.T vs 6952.T vs UHR.SW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Seiko 8050.T$4.71B+54%+16%11%21.0×24.4%
Citizen Watch 7762.T$2.90B+3%+17%10%12.8×10.1%
Casio Computer 6952.T$2.74B+24%+12%11%15.9×0.2%
Swatch Group Ltd. Bearer UHR.SW$11.3B-13%0%2%43.1×21.6%

How Seiko compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Seiko against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8050.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.0%+3.2%lowest of 15
6-month return+54.1%+0.9%5th highest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-24.6%-23.0%7th lowest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.2%+5.0%6th highest of 15
Operating margin10.7%9.4%8th highest of 15
Forward P/E21.0×24.2×7th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)24.4%1.2%2nd most demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.6%+13.5%4th lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.8 pp-12.9 pp2nd most demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.6 pp+6.8 pp5th lowest of 14
EV / EBITDA15.1×12.5×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.0×6th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Seiko 8050.TJapan$4.71B+54%+16%11%21.0×24.4%+10.6%
Laopu Gold 6181.HKHong Kong$6.84B-48%+109%27%6.9×n/an/a
Samsonite 1910.HKHong Kong$2.52B-6%+1%15%10.3×-12.2%+18.0%
Pandora A/S PNDORA.CODenmark$10.1B+67%+1%24%13.7×-6.9%+11.4%
Lao Feng Xiang 600612.SSChina$2.04B-17%-40%6%17.2×-16.9%+0.4%
Swatch Group Ltd. Bearer UHR.SWSwitzerland$11.3B-13%0%2%43.1×21.6%+2.3%
China National Gold Group Gold Jewellery 600916.SSChina$1.80B-20%-9%0%28.6×24.2%+15.6%
PC Jeweller PCJEWELLER.NSIndia$1.63B+67%+29%24%n/an/an/a
Sky Gold and Diamonds SKYGOLD.NSIndia$1.56B+92%+73%7%31.5×n/an/a
Savaria SIS.TOCanada$1.53B+3%+7%14%19.9×9.3%+20.8%
Chow Tai Fook 1929.HKHong Kong$15.0B+3%+5%19%11.3×-8.1%+6.1%
Thangamayil Jewellery THANGAMAYL.NSIndia$1.37B+1%+78%6%29.4×28.5%+36.1%
Mokingran Jewellery 2585.HKHong Kong$1.37B+118%+5%4%29.7×n/an/a
DR Corporation Limited Class A 301177.SZChina$1.29B-26%-4%-6%124.3×n/an/a
Gens Aurea OROX.MIItaly$1.27Bn/a+95%11%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Seiko's main competitors?
Named competitors: Citizen Watch (7762.T), Casio Computer (6952.T), Swatch Group (UHR.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Laopu Gold (6181.HK), Samsonite (1910.HK), Pandora A/S (PNDORA.CO), Lao Feng Xiang (600612.SS), Swatch Group Ltd. Bearer (UHR.SW), China National Gold Group Gold Jewellery (600916.SS).
Is Seiko expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 21.0× against a peer median of 24.2×, 7th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 24% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Seiko stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +54.1% against +0.9% for the median peer; over one year +152.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.