Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8027.TWO E&R Engineering Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

E&R Engineering Corp.8027.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Momentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$412M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$9.08M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
172.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.0 pp
WACC 7.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$126.00
1D-7.3%
1W-22.9%
1M-39.9%
3M-28.2%
6M-37.6%
YTD+15.1%
1Y+44.5%
ATR %9.3%
52w lowhigh57.6% off high

What E&R Engineering does

No business profile yet.

E&R Engineering at a glance

Size E&R Engineering (8027.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $412M, the 515th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$126.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.6%, against -24.9% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 38.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.7%); the operating margin is -2.1% (peer median 5.6%).

Valuation It trades at 172.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 8.3× (most expensive of 9).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.0 points below its cost of capital (7.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 758027.TWO 64
Six months, rebased to 100: E&R Engineering against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

E&R Engineering financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$2.13BNT$1.81BNT$1.64BNT$1.55BNT$3.22B
Revenue growth—+10%+6%-52%—
Gross profitNT$583MNT$508MNT$473MNT$523MNT$1.05B
EBITDANT$141MNT$101MNT$42.0MNT$157MNT$527M
Net incomeNT$32.9M-NT$97.8M-NT$51.1MNT$30.9MNT$391M
Free cash flow-NT$285M-NT$268M-NT$263MNT$314M-NT$562M
Capital expenditureNT$398MNT$338MNT$500MNT$171MNT$186M
Total debtNT$785MNT$954MNT$830MNT$1.29BNT$1.21B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

E&R Engineering competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%090710614330139969330028775946SUBROSZIL263810013953001723009043012553008970023373009880231601958708027.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. E&R Engineering is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0×50×100×150×61436933ZIL2638163630231601958708027.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. E&R Engineering is the large dot.

E&R Engineering competitors and peer comparison

How E&R Engineering compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

E&R Engineering against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8027.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-39.9%-15.0%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-37.6%-24.9%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-57.6%-39.3%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+38.0%+13.7%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-2.1%5.6%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E172.6×8.3×most expensive of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.0 pp-2.8 pp2nd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA96.7×9.6×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×-1.9×2nd most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
E&R Engineering 8027.TWOTaiwan$412M-38%+38%-2%172.6×n/an/a
Hyulim ROBOT 090710.KSSouth Korea$412M-63%-38%-25%n/an/an/a
Sodick 6143.TJapan$412M-18%+15%7%8.3×-4.2%+6.8%
Zhejiang Extek Technology 301399.SZChina$413M-29%+21%-1%n/an/an/a
Amax 6933.TWTaiwan$413M+87%+15%7%25.9×n/an/a
Wuxi Smart Auto-Control Engineering 002877.SZChina$414M-15%-14%3%n/a21.9%+13.5%
Chofu Seisakusho 5946.TJapan$416M0%-1%5%n/a6.6%+1.3%
Subros SUBROS.NSIndia$416M-25%+14%5%21.5×n/an/a
ElringKlinger ZIL2.DEGermany$407M-3%0%5%8.4×-4.1%+2.1%
ANEST IWATA 6381.TJapan$407M+2%+6%10%16.2×2.1%+9.5%
Yalian Machinery 001395.SZChina$407M-22%+19%27%n/a-5.6%+18.2%
CEC Environmental Protection 300172.SZChina$406M-23%0%9%n/a3.2%-4.9%
Yinchuan Weili Transmission Technology 300904.SZChina$406M-35%+69%-7%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Tongli Transmission Technology 301255.SZChina$418M-37%+14%-5%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Seck Intelligent Technology 300897.SZChina$419M-25%+1%-3%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou Zhongya Machinery 300512.SZChina$405M-29%+20%2%n/a29.5%+11.9%
Tianjin Saixiang Technology 002337.SZChina$405M-25%+11%6%n/a23.7%+14.1%
Tianjin Jinrong Tianyu Precision Machinery 300988.SZChina$405M-30%+23%7%n/an/an/a
Torishima Pump Mfg.Co 6363.TJapan$403M-23%+1%7%8.2×-2.0%+12.8%
TK Corporation 023160.KSSouth Korea$403M-52%+25%12%6.2×-8.4%+9.5%
HAESUNG DS 195870.KSSouth Korea$422M-58%+33%11%7.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are E&R Engineering's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hyulim ROBOT (090710.KS), Sodick (6143.T), Zhejiang Extek Technology (301399.SZ), Amax (6933.TW), Wuxi Smart Auto-Control Engineering (002877.SZ), Chofu Seisakusho (5946.T), Subros (SUBROS.NS), ElringKlinger (ZIL2.DE).
Is E&R Engineering expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 172.6× against a peer median of 8.3×, most expensive of 9 in its peer set.
How has E&R Engineering stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.6% against -24.9% for the median peer; over one year +44.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.