Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7792.TWO AM-Power Machine International Enterprise Co LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise Co Ltd7792.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$356M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$5.77M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+14.9 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
+0 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$252.50
1D-8.5%
1W-23.1%
1M-42.4%
3M+27.5%
6M-26.2%
YTD+16.1%
1Y+26.6%
ATR %8.9%
52w lowhigh45.3% off high

What AM-Power Machine International Enterprise does

No business profile yet.

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise at a glance

Size AM-Power Machine International Enterprise (7792.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $356M, the 579th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$252.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.2%, against -21.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 30.5% over the last twelve months (peer median -4.2%); the operating margin is 10.9% (peer median 6.8%).

Valuation It trades at 1.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.6× (11th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +0 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.9 points above its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 777792.TWO 76
Six months, rebased to 100: AM-Power Machine International Enterprise against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$6.48BNT$5.99BNT$4.59BNT$4.75BNT$4.83B
Revenue growth—+30%-4%-2%—
Gross profitNT$1.08BNT$801MNT$693MNT$751MNT$581M
EBITDANT$742MNT$543Mn/aNT$558MNT$386M
Net incomeNT$516MNT$372MNT$333MNT$403MNT$111M
Free cash flowNT$320MNT$118Mn/aNT$91.8MNT$107M
Capital expenditureNT$3.17MNT$6.43Mn/aNT$160MNT$61.4M
Total debtNT$452MNT$830Mn/aNT$982MNT$851M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-30%-20%-10%0028306039031938PNCINFRA002949TOR603637009410002856603797603030300989603909603183DRX60301797557792.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. AM-Power Machine International Enterprise is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×2.5×5×7.5×0028306039031938PNCINFRA002949TOR603637009410002856603797603030300989TRK603909002542603183DRX603017SWSOLAR97557792.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. AM-Power Machine International Enterprise is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%-10%0%10%0028306039031938PNCINFRA002949TOR009410603797TRK603183DRX6030177792.TWOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. AM-Power Machine International Enterprise is the large dot.

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise competitors and peer comparison

How AM-Power Machine International Enterprise compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

AM-Power Machine International Enterprise against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7792.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-42.4%-11.1%lowest of 21
6-month return-26.2%-21.3%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.3%-39.5%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+30.5%-4.2%highest of 21
Operating margin10.9%6.8%5th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.7×1.6×11th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.7%-2.1%2nd most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.4%+0.2%5th highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+0.2 pp-6.2 pp6th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.9 pp-0.6 pp5th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA14.7×7.6×most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-1.2×-0.6×3rd least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
AM-Power Machine International Enterprise 7792.TWOTaiwan$356M-26%+30%11%1.7×7.7%+7.4%
Shenzhen Mingdiao Decoration 002830.SZChina$356M-20%+5%7%1.9×4.5%-4.1%
CSD Water Service 603903.SSChina$357M-4%-9%-7%3.6×-2.1%-8.8%
Nippon Rietec 1938.TJapan$355M-16%+9%10%0.7×-0.1%+6.1%
PNC Infratech PNCINFRA.NSIndia$354M-42%+2%20%1.1×-16.2%-0.8%
Shenzhen Capol International & Associates 002949.SZChina$359M-15%-19%12%1.9×2.7%-8.7%
Torpol TOR.WAPoland$353M-12%+16%5%0.5×-13.0%+7.3%
Zhenhai Petrochemical Engineering 603637.SSChina$360M-39%-15%8%3.5×n/an/a
Taeyoung Engineering & Construction 009410.KSSouth Korea$360M-24%-35%9%0.9×-6.1%-1.0%
Shenzhen Magic Design & Decoration Engineering 002856.SZChina$352M+26%-25%-47%8.4×n/an/a
Guangdong Liantai Environmental Protection 603797.SSChina$351M-17%+2%37%7.6×3.5%+11.3%
Shanghai Trendzone 603030.SSChina$350M-33%+28%-18%2.6×n/an/a
LAY-OUT Planning Consultants 300989.SZChina$363M-24%-20%-34%7.8×n/an/a
Trakcja TRK.WAPoland$350M-23%-2%7%0.6×-6.6%+10.9%
C and D Holsin Engineering Consulting 603909.SSChina$348M-27%+23%2%0.1×n/an/a
China Zhonghua Geotechnical Engineering 002542.SZChina$366M-23%-33%-83%6.1×n/an/a
Suzhou Institute of Building Science 603183.SSChina$347M-3%-6%7%3.0×10.1%+0.2%
ADF DRX.TOCanada$346M+62%+30%14%1.2×-15.6%+8.4%
ARTS 603017.SSChina$345M-46%-10%9%1.4×-0.2%-8.5%
Sterling And Wilson Renewable Energy SWSOLAR.NSIndia$369M-32%-9%5%0.6×n/an/a
OYO 9755.TJapan$370M-6%-2%5%0.3×-13.5%+9.0%

Questions

Which companies are AM-Power Machine International Enterprise's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shenzhen Mingdiao Decoration (002830.SZ), CSD Water Service (603903.SS), Nippon Rietec (1938.T), PNC Infratech (PNCINFRA.NS), Shenzhen Capol International & Associates (002949.SZ), Torpol (TOR.WA), Zhenhai Petrochemical Engineering (603637.SS), Taeyoung Engineering & Construction (009410.KS).
Is AM-Power Machine International Enterprise expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.7× against a peer median of 1.6×, 11th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +0 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has AM-Power Machine International Enterprise stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.2% against -21.3% for the median peer; over one year +26.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.