Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7669.TWO Suregiant Technology Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Suregiant Technology Co. Ltd.7669.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery
Momentum weak 29
Mkt cap
$342M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$1.19M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+18.6 pp
WACC 6.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · TWDNT$514.00
1D-6.5%
1W-18.8%
1M-23.9%
3M-7.7%
6M-39.2%
YTD+16.4%
1Yn/a
ATR %7.6%
52w lowhigh50.3% off high

What Suregiant Technology does

Employees: 37

Suregiant Technology at a glance

Size Suregiant Technology (7669.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $342M, the 603rd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$514.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.2%, against -20.4% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 150.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 51.2% (peer median 3.7%).

Valuation It trades at 44.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.9× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.6 points above its cost of capital (6.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 807669.TWO 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Suregiant Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Suregiant Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenuen/aNT$252MNT$101MNT$58.1M
Revenue growth—+150%+74%—
Gross profitn/aNT$169MNT$57.2MNT$21.1M
EBITDAn/aNT$138MNT$51.6MNT$15.0M
Net incomen/aNT$118MNT$35.5MNT$4.68M
Free cash flown/a-NT$229MNT$38.7MNT$17.3M
Capital expendituren/aNT$347MNT$0NT$320,000
Total debtNT$222MNT$219MNT$30.9MNT$34.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Suregiant Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%63396030761569300097688255300509349830017366676328002630MEC663800238168852945327669.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Suregiant Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×20×40×633960307615693000976882553498300173632860085400263060332079347669.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Suregiant Technology is the large dot.

Suregiant Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Suregiant Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Suregiant Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7669.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.9%-11.4%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-39.2%-20.4%3rd lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-50.3%-35.1%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+150.3%+7.3%highest of 21
Operating margin51.2%3.7%highest of 21
EV / Sales44.2×1.9×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+18.6 pp-4.6 pp3rd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA81.0×12.9×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×0.7×4th least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Suregiant Technology 7669.TWOTaiwan$342M-39%+150%51%44.2×n/an/a
Sintokogio,Ltd 6339.TJapan$342M+3%+5%2%0.4×9.8%+16.4%
Ningbo Lehui International Engineering Equipment 603076.SSChina$341M-41%+22%2%1.4×34.4%+13.0%
Bin Chuan Enterprise 1569.TWOTaiwan$343M+25%-6%-15%4.1×n/an/a
Dalian Zhiyun Automation 300097.SZChina$341M-27%+33%-68%10.9×n/an/a
Hangzhou Kaierda Welding Robot 688255.SSChina$341M-30%+21%5%2.6×28.0%+1.8%
Jiangsu Newamstar Packaging Machinery 300509.SZChina$340M-33%+16%12%1.3×-5.1%+11.9%
USUN Technology 3498.TWOTaiwan$344M+91%+38%18%4.9×13.7%-6.6%
Funeng Oriental Equipment Technology 300173.SZChina$339M-28%-22%-14%2.6×n/an/a
Trusval Technology 6667.TWOTaiwan$346M-20%+27%11%1.7×2.1%+37.4%
Ebara Jitsugyo 6328.TJapan$347M-8%+4%15%0.9×-3.3%+6.4%
Jiangsu Chunlan Refrigerating Equipment Stock 600854.SSChina$337M-20%+41%-20%6.5×-10.7%-17.0%
China Western Power Industrial 002630.SZChina$336M-5%-53%-24%6.3×-2.0%-5.3%
Zhejiang Dibay Electric 603320.SSChina$348M-36%-2%7%2.1×11.5%+6.3%
Mayville Engineering MECUnited States$335M-52%+15%-1%0.8×n/an/a
ReTech Environmental Solutions 7934.TWOTaiwan$350Mn/a+13%16%8.4×n/an/a
Mimaki Engineering 6638.TJapan$351M+25%+1%12%0.8×-2.7%+11.4%
Zhejiang Double Arrow Rubber 002381.SZChina$333M-19%-4%1%1.0×5.7%+8.1%
Dalian Haosen Intelligent Manufacturing 688529.SSChina$333M-33%-19%-83%3.0×-4.2%+7.4%
Junhe Pumps 603617.SSChina$352M-21%+9%5%1.8×n/an/a
Rechi Precision 4532.TWTaiwan$332M-2%-9%5%0.7×-3.8%+1.0%

Questions

Which companies are Suregiant Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Sintokogio,Ltd (6339.T), Ningbo Lehui International Engineering Equipment (603076.SS), Bin Chuan Enterprise (1569.TWO), Dalian Zhiyun Automation (300097.SZ), Hangzhou Kaierda Welding Robot (688255.SS), Jiangsu Newamstar Packaging Machinery (300509.SZ), USUN Technology (3498.TWO), Funeng Oriental Equipment Technology (300173.SZ).
Is Suregiant Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 44.2× against a peer median of 1.9×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Suregiant Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.2% against -20.4% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.