Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7458.T Daiichikosho Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Daiichikosho Co., Ltd.7458.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Japanese karaoke company making DAM-brand karaoke systems and operating the Big Echo chain of karaoke box venues.

≈ Japan's leading karaoke-machine maker and karaoke-room operator, a category with no directMomentum neutral 58
Mkt cap
$1.13B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
63%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.14M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.3 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,721
1D-4.4%
1W+2.1%
1M-1.7%
3M-3.8%
6M+6.0%
YTD+2.1%
1Y+5.0%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh10.3% off high

What Daiichikosho does

Japanese karaoke company making DAM-brand karaoke systems and operating the Big Echo chain of karaoke box venues.

Rents its DAM machines to bars, hotels and karaoke boxes rather than selling them, and collects ongoing content fees as songs are played, which builds on an installed base. The Big Echo venues earn from room charges, food and drink, so they are more sensitive to people going out.

In one line: Japan's leading karaoke-machine maker and karaoke-room operator, a category with no direct.

Products and services

  • DAM karaoke systems
  • Big Echo karaoke box venues
  • Karaoke content/song licensing

Customers

  • Karaoke box operators
  • Consumers (Big Echo venues)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Karaoke equipment & venues
  • Karaoke hardware and box-room operation

What could go right

  • Nightlife/leisure spending recovery

What could go wrong

  • Declining karaoke-venue foot traffic long-term
  • Consumer discretionary spending sensitivity

Moat: narrow (installed base, brand). Large installed base of DAM karaoke machines and licensed song catalog create switching costs for venue operators.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 3,694

Named competitors

  • Xing Inc. (Joysound) private or unlisted

Daiichikosho at a glance

Size Daiichikosho (7458.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $1.13B, the 686th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,721 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.0%, against -18.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.4%); the operating margin is 11.4% (peer median 6.8%).

Valuation It trades at 13.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.6× (5th cheapest of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267458.T 106Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Daiichikosho against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Daiichikosho financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥164B¥163B¥153B¥147B¥128B
Revenue growth—+6%+4%+15%—
Gross profit¥56.8B¥55.4B¥53.1B¥51.9B¥43.7B
EBITDA¥36.6B¥35.5B¥33.3B¥31.6B¥23.9B
Net income¥15.5B¥15.9B¥18.2B¥12.6B¥8.32B
Free cash flown/a¥8.31B¥9.60B-¥18.9B¥17.4B
Capital expendituren/a¥23.3B¥21.0B¥50.6B¥11.9B
Total debt¥54.7B¥54.9B¥53.6B¥64.4B¥44.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Daiichikosho competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-10%0%002173IMD8415601026603809002993BYWSNL300893RDX25906003136010869960099080988051197998306050117458.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Daiichikosho is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×IMD8415002993SNLRDX25907458.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Daiichikosho is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%IMD8415SNLRDX6003136010869960099080517458.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Daiichikosho is the large dot.

Daiichikosho competitors and peer comparison

How Daiichikosho compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Daiichikosho against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7458.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.7%-6.6%5th highest of 21
6-month return+6.0%-18.7%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-10.3%-33.9%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.4%+10.4%4th lowest of 20
Operating margin11.4%6.8%6th highest of 20
Forward P/E13.0×19.6×5th cheapest of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.0%-6.3%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.8%+8.8%4th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.8 pp-10.8 pp4th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.3 pp+1.4 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA5.3×10.2×cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×-0.2×6th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Daiichikosho 7458.TJapan$1.13B+6%+4%11%13.0×-6.0%+11.8%
Innovation Medical Management 002173.SZChina$1.12B-29%-13%-18%n/an/an/a
Imdex IMD.AXAustralia$1.15B-21%+21%16%24.5×20.1%+14.5%
Brighton-Best International (Taiwan) 8415.TWOTaiwan$1.11B+5%+11%20%7.8×-8.8%+8.8%
Techstorm Advanced Material 601026.SSChina$1.16B-33%+8%6%n/an/an/a
Chengdu Haoneng Technology 603809.SSChina$1.16B-23%+18%10%20.5×n/an/a
Dongguan Aohai Technology 002993.SZChina$1.10B-44%+122%1%19.6×n/an/a
BayWa BYW.DEGermany$1.07B-58%n/an/an/an/an/a
Supply Network SNL.AXAustralia$1.06B+12%+16%17%26.9×11.7%+19.9%
Zhejiang Songyuan Automotive Safety Systems 300893.SZChina$1.06B-34%+27%12%20.1×n/an/a
Redox RDX.AXAustralia$1.22B+2%+7%11%17.5×-7.8%+10.8%
Beijing Geekplus Technology 2590.HKHong Kong$1.05B-67%+33%0%478.1×n/an/a
China Agricultural Development Seed 600313.SSChina$1.04B-16%+35%1%n/a21.8%+12.7%
Gansu Guofang Industry & Trade (Group) 601086.SSChina$1.27B+42%+17%7%n/a33.6%-4.8%
Totech 9960.TJapan$1.00B0%+6%10%10.7×5.4%+9.2%
Deep Source 0990.HKHong Kong$1.00B-31%+7%2%n/a-13.6%+6.1%
Inabata & 8098.TJapan$1.31B+6%+5%3%n/a-7.8%+7.6%
Yamazen 8051.TJapan$978M+13%+7%2%n/a-6.3%+4.5%
Taikisha 1979.TJapan$1.32B-5%-1%8%10.6×-13.3%+7.2%
Trusco Nakayama 9830.TJapan$958M+6%+10%7%9.4×n/an/a
Hangzhou Cogeneration 605011.SSChina$956M-23%-1%5%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Daiichikosho's main competitors?
Named competitors: Xing Inc. (Joysound) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Innovation Medical Management (002173.SZ), Imdex (IMD.AX), Brighton-Best International (Taiwan) (8415.TWO), Techstorm Advanced Material (601026.SS), Chengdu Haoneng Technology (603809.SS), Dongguan Aohai Technology (002993.SZ).
Is Daiichikosho expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.0× against a peer median of 19.6×, 5th cheapest of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Daiichikosho stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.0% against -18.7% for the median peer; over one year +5.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.