Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6951.HK Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) Co., Ltd. Class H6951.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Electronic Components

One of China's largest makers of MLCC ceramic capacitors and fine ceramic components used across electronics.

≈ A Chinese Yageo/Samsung Electro-Mechanics for MLCCs
Mkt cap
$20.2B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$24.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.6 pp
WACC 19.7%
Hurdle
+17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$68.20
1D-3.3%
1W-11.8%
1M-48.8%
3M-36.3%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %13.4%
52w lowhigh55.3% off high

What Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) does

One of China's largest makers of MLCC ceramic capacitors and fine ceramic components used across electronics.

Makes its own ceramic powders and then forms them into finished parts, from MLCCs (tiny stacked capacitors) to ferrules for optical-fibre connectors and ceramic substrates; controlling the powder lets it sell several part types to the same electronics customers. Its home listing is in Shenzhen; the Hong Kong shares are a second listing of the same company.

In one line: A Chinese Yageo/Samsung Electro-Mechanics for MLCCs.

Products and services

  • MLCC ceramic capacitors
  • Ceramic packages/substrates
  • Fine ceramic components (fuel cells, filters)

Customers

  • Consumer electronics, telecom & auto electronics m

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronic components
  • Passive components
  • MLCC capacitors & fine ceramic packages

What could go right

  • EV/AI electronics content growth driving MLCC demand

What could go wrong

  • Passive-component price cyclicality
  • Competition from Japanese/Korean incumbents

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how). Vertically integrated ceramic-materials know-how and manufacturing scale in a technically demanding component.

Headquarters: Chaozhou, China · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 17,352

Named competitors

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) at a glance

Size Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) (6951.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $20.2B, the 89th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$68.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 73.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +33.4%); the operating margin is 33.9% (peer median 12.9%).

Valuation It trades at 22.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.3× (10th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 34% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points above its cost of capital (19.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$16.0BHK$9.70BHK$7.95BHK$6.27BHK$5.94B
Revenue growth—+22%+27%+6%—
Gross profitHK$8.11BHK$3.92BHK$3.27BHK$2.37BHK$2.52B
EBITDAn/aHK$3.43BHK$2.85BHK$1.95BHK$1.97B
Net incomeHK$5.18BHK$2.84BHK$2.37BHK$1.75BHK$1.75B
Free cash flowHK$3.95BHK$2.78BHK$1.98BHK$1.42BHK$1.22B
Capital expenditureHK$1.37BHK$629MHK$693MHK$603MHK$1.31B
Total debtHK$4.45BHK$2.18BHK$1.30BHK$1.29BHK$402M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×30×40×00291600246340623004763008NVT80460029386762CLS00238423684958303700228131892382348160322862746951.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%40623008NVT80466762CLS236830373189238234816951.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) is the large dot.

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6951.HK vs 2327.TW vs 009150.KS vs 6981.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) 6951.HK$20.2Bn/a+74%34%22.3×34.2%
Yageo 2327.TW$23.3B+8%+32%27%13.9×17.7%
SamsungElecMech 009150.KS$47.2B+5%+22%12%38.7×42.8%
Murata Manufacturing 6981.T$57.1B-5%+15%20%23.0×29.8%
Tdk 6762.T$25.4B-27%+25%10%15.0×18.2%

How Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6951.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-48.8%-39.8%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-55.3%-50.8%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+73.8%+33.4%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin33.9%12.9%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E22.3×19.3×10th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)34.2%18.2%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.8%+7.7%3rd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+17.4 pp+10.8 pp6th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.6 pp+3.9 pp11th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) 6951.HKHong Kong$20.2Bn/a+74%34%22.3×34.2%+16.8%
Shennan Circuit 002916.SZChina$20.4B-36%+51%18%22.6×n/an/a
Wus Printed Circuit (Kunshan) 002463.SZChina$21.2B-29%+61%28%18.2×n/an/a
Ibiden 4062.TJapan$22.1B+164%+26%18%39.2×39.2%+5.2%
Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) 300476.SZChina$18.3B-62%+38%26%17.2×n/an/a
Largan Precision 3008.TWTaiwan$17.7B+76%0%35%26.0×12.6%+1.8%
NVT NVTUnited States$17.2B-38%+48%18%16.4×16.2%+14.3%
Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board 8046.TWTaiwan$17.1B-12%+34%12%26.1×58.7%+0.8%
Avary Holding (Shenzhen) 002938.SZChina$16.2B-35%+8%10%22.4×n/an/a
Tdk 6762.TJapan$25.4B-27%+25%10%15.0×18.2%+11.1%
Celestica CLS.TOCanada$26.3B-44%+61%9%11.5×11.0%+17.6%
Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing 002384.SZChina$26.9B-57%+56%11%18.0×n/an/a
Gold Circuit Electronics 2368.TWTaiwan$12.9B-45%+68%26%14.5×14.2%+20.7%
Zhen Ding Technology Holding Lt 4958.TWTaiwan$12.8B-12%+5%9%18.4×n/an/a
Unimicron Technology 3037.TWTaiwan$35.4B-19%+33%13%20.1×45.9%+8.3%
Accelink Technologies 002281.SZChina$10.8B-37%+32%11%42.6×n/an/a
Kinsus Interconnect Technology 3189.TWTaiwan$10.7B+27%+34%14%29.4×41.2%+7.7%
Sunny Optical 2382.HKHong Kong$8.92B-3%+20%8%14.8×4.9%+1.9%
Innolux 3481.TWTaiwan$8.71B+32%+11%0%62.6×37.3%-3.4%
Shenzhen Kinwong Electronic 603228.SSChina$8.38B-23%+33%12%22.6×n/an/a
Taiwan Union Technology 6274.TWOTaiwan$8.21B-26%+87%23%13.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group)'s main competitors?
Named competitors: Yageo Corporation (2327.TW), Samsung Electro-Mechanics (009150.KS), Murata (6981.T), TDK (6762.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shennan Circuit (002916.SZ), Wus Printed Circuit (Kunshan) (002463.SZ), Ibiden (4062.T), Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) (300476.SZ), Largan Precision (3008.TW), NVT (NVT).
Is Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.3× against a peer median of 19.3×, 10th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 34% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +17%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.