Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688525.SS Biwin Storage Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Biwin Storage Technology Co., Ltd. Class A688525.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Computer Peripherals

Chinese maker of NAND flash storage products, including SSDs and memory modules for consumer and enterprise devices.

≈ China's Kingston Technology (memory/SSD modules)Momentum laggard 0
Mkt cap
$8.99B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
68%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$482M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
5.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+10.6 pp
WACC 14.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
180 days
5 May 2027
Close · CNYCN¥126.00
1D-5.9%
1W-3.6%
1M-31.2%
3M-39.1%
6M-52.5%
YTD+9.8%
1Y+17.1%
ATR %8.6%
52w lowhigh75.6% off high

What Biwin Storage Technology does

Chinese maker of NAND flash storage products, including SSDs and memory modules for consumer and enterprise devices.

Buys NAND flash memory from chipmakers, adds controllers and firmware, and sells the finished drives and modules, so profit depends on the gap between memory purchase costs and product prices. Phone and PC makers buy under supply agreements, while consumer products go through retail and online channels.

In one line: China's Kingston Technology (memory/SSD modules).

Products and services

  • Solid-state drives (SSDs)
  • eMMC/UFS embedded storage
  • Memory modules

Customers

  • PC/smartphone OEMs
  • Enterprise/data-center buyers
  • Retail/consumer channel

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Computer Peripherals
  • Flash memory module and SSD…

What could go right

  • AI server/data-center storage demand growth

What could go wrong

  • NAND price cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in consumer electronics

Moat: none (scale). Module assembly and packaging scale, but reliant on NAND chips sourced from third-party fabs.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Founded: 2009 · Employees: 2,852

Named competitors

Biwin Storage Technology at a glance

Size Biwin Storage Technology (688525.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Computer Peripherals) with a market value of $8.99B, the 272nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥126.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 52.5%, against -0.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 220.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.4%); the operating margin is 41.2% (peer median 11.5%).

Valuation It trades at 5.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.8× (3rd cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.6 points above its cost of capital (14.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 May 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 98688525.SS 40
Six months, rebased to 100: Biwin Storage Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Biwin Storage Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥26.4BCN¥11.3BCN¥6.69BCN¥3.59BCN¥2.99B
Revenue growth—+69%+86%+20%—
Gross profitCN¥12.8BCN¥2.36BCN¥1.18BCN¥35.0MCN¥389M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.22BCN¥285M-CN¥569MCN¥130M
Net incomeCN¥9.59BCN¥853MCN¥161M-CN¥624MCN¥71.2M
Free cash flow-CN¥12.4B-CN¥3.41B-CN¥435M-CN¥2.38B-CN¥959M
Capital expenditureCN¥2.00BCN¥1.52BCN¥968MCN¥416MCN¥267M
Total debtCN¥24.1BCN¥7.98BCN¥4.62BCN¥3.59BCN¥1.61B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Biwin Storage Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-30%-20%-10%0%3000540009386885386448000021LOGN23012409237667246008396884753653237724513260EXTR33247751688525.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Biwin Storage Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×20×40×3000540009386448000021LOGN2301237680696884753653245132603324688525.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Biwin Storage Technology is the large dot.

Biwin Storage Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688525.SS vs 301308.SZ vs 005930.KS vs 3260.TWO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Biwin Storage Technology 688525.SS$8.99B-52%+221%41%5.0×n/a
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics 301308.SZ$12.3B-46%+114%40%5.1×n/a
SamsungElec 005930.KS$886B-14%+88%46%4.0×-7.2%
ADATA Technology 3260.TWO$3.16B-33%+125%34%4.5×n/a
Transcend Information 2451.TW$3.22B-13%+286%67%3.2×n/a
Sandisk SNDK$119B-47%+272%73%3.4×3.5%

How Biwin Storage Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Biwin Storage Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688525.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-31.2%-17.1%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-52.5%-0.7%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-75.6%-32.8%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+220.7%+8.4%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin41.2%11.5%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E5.0×13.8×3rd cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.6 pp+6.1 pp10th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Biwin Storage Technology 688525.SSChina$8.99B-52%+221%41%5.0×n/an/a
Hubei Dinglong 300054.SZChina$8.79B-2%+7%30%51.4×32.2%+15.0%
Unisplendour 000938.SZChina$10.4B-24%+25%3%21.8×n/an/a
Everdisplay Optronics (Shanghai) 688538.SSChina$6.72B-9%-2%-31%n/an/an/a
Brother Industries 6448.TJapan$6.52B+39%+7%13%10.5×-6.3%+7.2%
Shenzhen Kaifa Technology 000021.SZChina$6.13B-11%+14%11%29.2×n/an/a
Logitech International LOGN.SWSwitzerland$13.2B-1%-1%18%16.8×-5.7%-4.3%
Lite-on Technology 2301.TWTaiwan$13.2B+16%+24%13%13.8×n/an/a
AUO 2409.TWTaiwan$6.02B+49%-1%-2%n/an/an/a
Gigabyte Technology 2376.TWTaiwan$6.01B+7%+38%5%8.1×n/an/a
Seiko Epson 6724.TJapan$5.39B+27%+8%6%11.9×0.8%+7.2%
E Ink 8069.TWOTaiwan$4.98B+2%-3%29%12.4×-0.3%+18.6%
Sichuan Changhong Electric 600839.SSChina$3.55B-41%+4%0%n/an/an/a
Hangzhou EZVIZ Network 688475.SSChina$3.53B-4%+8%12%30.1×15.7%+13.8%
Jentech Precision Industrial 3653.TWTaiwan$23.1B+9%+28%33%48.3×32.5%+24.3%
Micro-Star International 2377.TWTaiwan$3.50B+43%+1%5%11.6×n/an/a
Transcend Information 2451.TWTaiwan$3.22B-13%+286%67%3.2×n/an/a
ADATA Technology 3260.TWOTaiwan$3.16B-33%+125%34%4.5×n/an/a
Extreme Networks EXTRUnited States$3.15B0%+11%6%17.2×27.3%+4.9%
AURAS Technology 3324.TWOTaiwan$2.90B-10%+71%16%15.1×n/an/a
Canon 7751.TJapan$28.4B+18%+4%10%12.2×-0.6%+7.9%

Questions

Who are Biwin Storage Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Longsys (Zhaoxin) (301308.SZ), Kingston Technology (private or unlisted), Samsung Electronics (005930.KS), ADATA Technology (3260.TWO), Transcend Information (2451.TW), SanDisk (SNDK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hubei Dinglong (300054.SZ), Unisplendour (000938.SZ), Everdisplay Optronics (Shanghai) (688538.SS), Brother Industries (6448.T), Shenzhen Kaifa Technology (000021.SZ), Logitech International (LOGN.SW).
Is Biwin Storage Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 5.0× against a peer median of 13.8×, 3rd cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has Biwin Storage Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -52.5% against -0.7% for the median peer; over one year +17.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.