Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6613.T QD Laser, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

QD Laser, Inc.6613.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Semiconductors
Momentum leader 95
Mkt cap
$546M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$29.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
184.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-19.9 pp
WACC 13.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,034
1D-8.3%
1W-15.8%
1M-12.1%
3M+37.0%
6M+43.3%
YTD+537.6%
1Y+426.9%
ATR %9.9%
52w lowhigh43.8% off high

What QD Laser does

Employees: 50

QD Laser at a glance

Size QD Laser (6613.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $546M, the 1021st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,034 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 43.3%, against -42.6% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +29.0%); the operating margin is -18.8% (peer median 1.1%).

Valuation It trades at 184.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (most expensive of 6).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 19.9 points below its cost of capital (13.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266613.T 143Peer median 58
Six months, rebased to 100: QD Laser against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

QD Laser financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥1.49B¥1.37B¥1.31B¥1.25B¥1.16B
Revenue growth—+5%+5%+8%—
Gross profit¥630M¥618M¥518M¥381M¥420M
EBITDA-¥184M-¥231M-¥347M-¥509M-¥491M
Net income-¥316M-¥357M-¥446M-¥643M-¥550M
Free cash flown/a-¥1.21B-¥674M-¥587M-¥530M
Capital expendituren/a¥732M¥168M¥146M¥16.7M
Total debt¥710M¥330M¥0¥8.65M¥16.5M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

QD Laser competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%VIKRAMSOLR003015425420688693688691JKS60339625338086002962688380300889KOPN0028666831001269166090811027016613.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. QD Laser is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×VIKRAMSOLR808668310012691660906613.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. QD Laser is the large dot.

QD Laser competitors and peer comparison

How QD Laser compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

QD Laser against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6613.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.1%-23.8%7th highest of 21
6-month return+43.3%-42.6%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.8%-57.0%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.9%+29.0%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin-18.8%1.1%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E184.9×15.8×most expensive of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-19.9 pp-4.6 pp7th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
QD Laser 6613.TJapan$546M+43%+7%-19%184.9×n/an/a
Vikram Solar VIKRAMSOLR.NSIndia$546M-37%+40%12%14.0×n/an/a
Jiangsu Rijiu Optoelectronics Jointstock 003015.SZChina$548M-22%+5%12%n/a15.8%+5.3%
TFE 425420.KSSouth Korea$544M-8%+54%17%n/a7.4%+15.5%
Suzhou Convert Semiconductor 688693.SSChina$543M-48%+49%-34%n/an/an/a
Brite Semiconductor (Shanghai) 688691.SSChina$542M-59%+27%-18%n/an/an/a
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR JKSUnited States$551M-55%-15%-8%n/an/an/a
Yingkou Jinchen Machinery 603396.SSChina$555M-24%-5%5%n/a21.1%+21.8%
Black Sesame International 2533.HKHong Kong$555M-66%+73%-148%n/an/an/a
Advanced Wireless Semiconductor 8086.TWOTaiwan$537M-41%+36%23%18.2×6.3%+3.0%
Hubei W-Olf Photoelectric Technology 002962.SZChina$534M-25%+3%1%n/a24.2%+15.0%
Shenzhen China Micro Semicon 688380.SSChina$532M-39%+40%21%n/a6.0%+24.3%
Shenzhen EXC-LED Technology 300889.SZChina$562M-29%+20%-7%n/an/an/a
Kopin KOPNUnited States$564M-44%-7%-35%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Transimage Technology 002866.SZChina$567M-49%-5%3%n/a12.9%+4.2%
Taiwan Microloops 6831.TWTaiwan$569M-46%+117%12%15.8×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia OJing Science and Technology 001269.SZChina$523M-16%-2%-51%47.7×n/an/a
Hana Materials 166090.KSSouth Korea$521M-51%+31%24%11.0×-2.6%+6.4%
Walton Advanced Engineering 8110.TWTaiwan$520M-32%+11%-19%n/an/an/a
Silex Systems SLX.AXAustralia$574M-49%+89%-33%n/a43.3%+48.1%
NSING Technologies 2701.HKHong Kong$517M-54%+55%1%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are QD Laser's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Vikram Solar (VIKRAMSOLR.NS), Jiangsu Rijiu Optoelectronics Jointstock (003015.SZ), TFE (425420.KS), Suzhou Convert Semiconductor (688693.SS), Brite Semiconductor (Shanghai) (688691.SS), JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR (JKS), Yingkou Jinchen Machinery (603396.SS), Black Sesame International (2533.HK).
Is QD Laser expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 184.9× against a peer median of 15.8×, most expensive of 6 in its peer set.
How has QD Laser stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +43.3% against -42.6% for the median peer; over one year +426.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.