Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2533.HK Black Sesame International Holding LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Black Sesame International Holding Limited2533.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Chinese designer of automotive-grade chips and software for autonomous driving and smart-cockpit systems.

≈ A small Chinese Mobileye/Qualcomm-Auto challengerMomentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$555M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
76%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.43M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-117.4 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
151 days
6 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$6.29
1D-5.9%
1W-7.9%
1M-33.4%
3M-47.1%
6M-65.7%
YTD-67.3%
1Y-74.6%
ATR %8.2%
52w lowhigh76.1% off high

What Black Sesame International does

Chinese designer of automotive-grade chips and software for autonomous driving and smart-cockpit systems.

Sells its driving chips together with software and development tools to Chinese carmakers and their tier-1 suppliers, so revenue arrives as design wins turn into vehicle production, usually with a long lag. Listed in Hong Kong in 2024, it invests heavily in chip development ahead of that revenue.

In one line: A small Chinese Mobileye/Qualcomm-Auto challenger.

Products and services

  • Huashan-series autonomous-driving chips
  • Wudang cross-domain computing platform
  • SesameX AI platform and Hanhai middleware

Customers

  • Chinese automakers and tier-1 suppliers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Automotive AI chips
  • ADAS and autonomous-driving chip plus…

What could go right

  • China smart-EV ADAS adoption
  • Design wins as a Nvidia/Qualcomm alternative

What could go wrong

  • Losses and scale gap versus Horizon Robotics and global rivals
  • Automotive qualification and design-cycle risk

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how, customer qualification). In-house chip-plus-software stack positions it as a domestic alternative to Qualcomm/Mobileye/Nvidia in Chinese cars.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 2016 · Employees: 1,037

Named competitors

Black Sesame International at a glance

Size Black Sesame International (2533.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $555M, the 732nd largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$6.29 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 65.7%, against -39.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 73.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.1%); the operating margin is -147.8% (peer median 2.2%).

Valuation It trades at 3.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (9th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 117.4 points below its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 6 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 612533.HK 35
Six months, rebased to 100: Black Sesame International against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Black Sesame International financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$1.15BHK$892MHK$514MHK$345MHK$192M
Revenue growth—+73%+49%+79%—
Gross profitHK$438MHK$248MHK$89.1M-HK$10.4M-HK$1.26M
EBITDA-HK$1.57B-HK$1.48B-HK$1.79B-HK$1.80B-HK$1.17B
Net income-HK$1.60B-HK$1.55BHK$340M-HK$5.36B-HK$3.20B
Free cash flow-HK$1.77B-HK$1.15B-HK$1.36B-HK$1.26B-HK$931M
Capital expenditureHK$113MHK$93.0MHK$60.3MHK$148MHK$76.8M
Total debtn/aHK$856MHK$768MHK$13.9BHK$9.35B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Black Sesame International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%603396JKS300889003015KOPNVIKRAMSOLR66130028664254206886936831688691002962301002001269SIS2533.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Black Sesame International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×20×40×60×603396JKS300889003015KOPNVIKRAMSOLR66134254206886936831688691SLX8086002962001269SIS2533.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Black Sesame International is the large dot.

Black Sesame International competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2533.HK vs 9660.HK vs QCOM vs MBLY)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Black Sesame International 2533.HK$555M-66%+73%-148%3.4×n/a
Horizon Robotics 9660.HK$7.61B-48%+46%-101%11.0×n/a
Qualcomm QCOM$177B-24%+2%24%4.2×15.9%
Mobileye Global MBLY$4.87B-38%+3%-18%1.7×1.8%
Nvidia NVDA$4.50T-13%+83%65%14.7×26.3%

How Black Sesame International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Black Sesame International against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2533.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-33.4%-16.6%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-65.7%-39.4%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-76.1%-54.8%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+73.4%+20.1%3rd highest of 20
Operating margin-147.8%2.2%lowest of 20
EV / Sales3.4×3.6×9th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-117.4 pp-6.3 pplowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Black Sesame International 2533.HKHong Kong$555M-66%+73%-148%3.4×n/an/a
Yingkou Jinchen Machinery 603396.SSChina$555M-24%-5%5%1.3×21.1%+21.8%
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR JKSUnited States$551M-55%-15%-8%0.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen EXC-LED Technology 300889.SZChina$562M-29%+20%-7%3.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu Rijiu Optoelectronics Jointstock 003015.SZChina$548M-22%+5%12%5.3×15.8%+5.3%
Kopin KOPNUnited States$564M-44%-7%-35%11.8×n/an/a
Vikram Solar VIKRAMSOLR.NSIndia$546M-37%+40%12%1.0×n/an/a
QD Laser 6613.TJapan$546M+43%+7%-19%56.3×n/an/a
Jiangsu Transimage Technology 002866.SZChina$567M-49%-5%3%1.9×12.9%+4.2%
TFE 425420.KSSouth Korea$544M-8%+54%17%5.2×7.4%+15.5%
Suzhou Convert Semiconductor 688693.SSChina$543M-48%+49%-34%10.0×n/an/a
Taiwan Microloops 6831.TWTaiwan$569M-46%+117%12%4.6×n/an/a
Brite Semiconductor (Shanghai) 688691.SSChina$542M-59%+27%-18%3.1×n/an/a
Silex Systems SLX.AXAustralia$574M-49%+89%-33%47.3×43.3%+48.1%
Advanced Wireless Semiconductor 8086.TWOTaiwan$537M-41%+36%23%3.6×6.3%+3.0%
Hubei W-Olf Photoelectric Technology 002962.SZChina$534M-25%+3%1%2.2×24.2%+15.0%
Centera Photonics 7917.TWOTaiwan$579Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Shenzhen China Micro Semicon 688380.SSChina$532M-39%+40%21%1.6×6.0%+24.3%
Shenzhen SOSEN Electronics 301002.SZChina$587M-39%+22%2%3.4×n/an/a
Inner Mongolia OJing Science and Technology 001269.SZChina$523M-16%-2%-51%7.8×n/an/a
First Sensor SIS.DEGermany$591M-6%-18%7%5.7×13.5%-7.4%

Questions

Who are Black Sesame International's main competitors?
Named competitors: Horizon Robotics (9660.HK), Qualcomm (QCOM), Mobileye (MBLY), Nvidia (NVDA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yingkou Jinchen Machinery (603396.SS), JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR (JKS), Shenzhen EXC-LED Technology (300889.SZ), Jiangsu Rijiu Optoelectronics Jointstock (003015.SZ), Kopin (KOPN), Vikram Solar (VIKRAMSOLR.NS).
Is Black Sesame International expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.4× against a peer median of 3.6×, 9th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Black Sesame International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -65.7% against -39.4% for the median peer; over one year -74.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.