Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6454.T Max Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Max Co., Ltd.6454.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Japanese maker of staplers, nail guns and construction fastening tools, plus rehabilitation and medical equipment.

≈ Japan's Stanley Black & Decker for fastening toolsMomentum weak 38
Mkt cap
$2.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.53M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+11.3 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥1,704
1D-2.2%
1W-9.0%
1M-10.7%
3M-8.8%
6M+0.7%
YTD-1.4%
1Y+21.7%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh13.7% off high

What Max does

Japanese maker of staplers, nail guns and construction fastening tools, plus rehabilitation and medical equipment.

Staplers and office equipment are a mature base, while construction tools, including rebar-tying machines that replace hand-tying on building sites, are where growth has been, sold through tool distributors to contractors. It also supplies bathroom-ventilation equipment for builders.

In one line: Japan's Stanley Black & Decker for fastening tools.

Products and services

  • Office staplers
  • Pneumatic nailers/rebar tools
  • Rehabilitation equipment

Customers

  • Construction contractors
  • Office supply retailers
  • Hospitals and rehab clinics

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Capital goods
  • Power tools and fasteners
  • Staplers, nailers, rebar-tying tools

What could go right

  • Construction labor-saving tool demand
  • Rehab equipment demand from aging population

What could go wrong

  • Construction cyclicality
  • Stationery market maturity

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Strong Japan brand recognition in stationery and construction tools; less differentiated overseas.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1942 · Employees: 2,470

Named competitors

Max at a glance

Size Max (6454.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $2.01B, the 480th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,704 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.7%, against -9.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 18 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.6%); the operating margin is 18.1% (peer median 13.0%).

Valuation It trades at 19.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.8× (9th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.3 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266454.T 95Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Max against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Max financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥106B¥99.6B¥91.8B¥86.6B¥84.3B
Revenue growth—+8%+6%+3%—
Gross profit¥51.9B¥47.8B¥42.6B¥38.6B¥35.0B
EBITDA¥22.9B¥20.9B¥17.8B¥15.7B¥12.9B
Net income¥15.1B¥13.9B¥11.2B¥10.4B¥7.62B
Free cash flow¥13.0B¥11.8B¥11.8B¥9.39B¥4.83B
Capital expenditure¥3.69B¥3.41B¥2.99B¥2.96B¥3.60B
Total debt¥1.21B¥1.54B¥1.52B¥1.77B¥2.65B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Max competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%+20%LAND601369300257EPAC6135301086600530060738998210BCHNLMW60328300041031676136ELGIEQUIP6454.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Max is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%25×50×75×LAND601369300257EPAC61353010863006078210BCHNLMWMFP31676136ELGIEQUIP6454.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Max is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%LAND601369EPAC613560053006078210BCHNMFP00041031676136ELGIEQUIP6454.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Max is the large dot.

Max competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6454.T vs SWK vs 6586.T vs ITW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Max 6454.T$2.01B+1%+11%18%19.4×2.4%
Stanley Black & Decker SWK$17.3B+43%0%10%18.3×6.8%
Makita 6586.T$8.78B-9%+9%14%16.6×0.6%
Illinois Tool Works ITW$79.8B+11%+5%27%23.4×9.7%
Techtronic Ind 0669.HK$33.1B+14%+4%9%22.8×8.1%
Kokuyo 7984.T$2.23B+9%+9%7%16.9×-6.2%
ACCO Brands ACCO$467M+25%+2%7%5.5×-0.9%

How Max compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Max against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6454.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.7%+0.3%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+0.7%-9.1%5th highest of 18
Distance from 52-week high-13.7%-24.6%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.0%+16.6%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin18.1%13.0%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E19.4×18.8×9th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.4%0.6%6th most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.2%+12.7%6th lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.8 pp-8.4 pp7th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+11.3 pp+3.0 pp7th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA12.3×9.8×6th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-1.6×-0.4×3rd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Max 6454.TJapan$2.01B+1%+11%18%19.4×2.4%+9.2%
Landis+Gyr LAND.SWSwitzerland$2.01B+17%-22%25%21.5×-10.2%-5.7%
Xi'an Shaangu Power 601369.SSChina$2.00B-22%-5%7%18.2×-11.1%+3.2%
Direct Drive Tech 6731.HKHong Kong$2.02Bn/a+253%-38%n/an/an/a
Kaishan 300257.SZChina$2.00B-56%+12%15%22.0×n/an/a
Enerpac Tool EPACUnited States$1.99B+9%+6%20%18.8×3.8%+4.3%
Makino Milling Machine 6135.TJapan$1.99B+35%+17%12%10.1×-3.2%+17.5%
Shenzhen Hongfuhan Technology 301086.SZChina$2.04B-23%+58%14%27.7×n/an/a
Miura 6005.TJapan$2.05B-11%+6%11%11.6×-4.3%+14.8%
Guangdong Topstar Technology 300607.SZChina$2.05B-1%+20%7%88.9×31.0%-1.8%
CIMC Enric 3899.HKHong Kong$1.96B-32%+6%4%10.4×-4.7%+15.6%
Chenbro Micom 8210.TWTaiwan$2.06B-57%+54%23%10.4×0.3%+23.9%
Burckhardt Compression BCHN.SWSwitzerland$2.07B-3%-15%13%18.6×-7.8%+9.9%
LMW LMW.NSIndia$1.93B+14%+19%4%55.9×n/an/a
Midera Food Processing MFPUnited States$1.92Bn/a+11%14%16.4×0.9%+10.5%
Suzhou Secote Precision Electronic 603283.SSChina$1.92B-12%+9%20%20.2×n/an/a
Shenyang Machine Tool 000410.SZChina$2.11B-14%+29%-3%n/a25.3%+22.7%
Excelland Robotics (Wuxi) 3231.HKHong Kong$1.91Bn/a+19%-36%n/an/an/a
Ta Liang Technology 3167.TWTaiwan$1.89B-9%+103%23%19.6×31.8%+15.9%
OSG 6136.TJapan$1.88B-2%+20%18%11.4×1.7%+9.0%
ELGI Equipments ELGIEQUIP.NSIndia$1.87B-1%+16%13%35.0×30.6%+15.5%

Questions

Who are Max's main competitors?
Named competitors: Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Hilti (private or unlisted), Makita (6586.T), Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Techtronic Industries (0669.HK), Kokuyo (7984.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Landis+Gyr (LAND.SW), Xi'an Shaangu Power (601369.SS), Direct Drive Tech (6731.HK), Kaishan (300257.SZ), Enerpac Tool (EPAC), Makino Milling Machine (6135.T).
Is Max expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.4× against a peer median of 18.8×, 9th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Max stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.7% against -9.1% for the median peer; over one year +21.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.