Loading…

OSG Corp6136.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Japanese maker of taps, drills and end mills — precision cutting tools used to machine metal parts.

≈ Japan's KennametalMomentum weak 29
Mkt cap
$1.88B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
68%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.5 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
69 days
14 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥3,200
1D-6.8%
1W-9.4%
1M-15.5%
3M-11.6%
6M-2.1%
YTD+40.0%
1Y+40.8%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh24.2% off high

What OSG does

Japanese maker of taps, drills and end mills — precision cutting tools used to machine metal parts.

Cutting tools are consumables that wear out, so revenue repeats while machines run; sales go mostly through distributors to machine shops. More than half of sales are outside Japan, with the Americas, Europe and Asia each significant, so the yen matters. Taps are the signature product, with end mills growing.

In one line: Japan's Kennametal.

Products and services

  • Taps
  • End mills
  • Rolling dies
  • Gauges

Customers

  • Automotive parts makers
  • Aerospace suppliers
  • General machine shops

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Capital goods
  • Cutting tools
  • Taps, drills, end mills, thread gauges

What could go right

  • Auto/aerospace machining demand
  • EV lightweight-alloy parts

What could go wrong

  • Global manufacturing capex cycles

Moat: narrow (process know-how, brand, distribution). Deep metallurgical/coating know-how and a global sales network built over decades.

Headquarters: Toyokawa, Japan · Founded: 1938 · Employees: 7,563

Named competitors

OSG at a glance

Size OSG (6136.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $1.88B, the 505th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,200 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.1%, against -10.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.9%); the operating margin is 18.2% (peer median 12.8%).

Valuation It trades at 11.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.9× (3rd cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.5 points above its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 14 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266136.T 98Peer median 88
Six months, rebased to 100: OSG against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

OSG financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-11-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥188B¥161B¥156B¥148B¥143B
Revenue growth—+3%+5%+4%—
Gross profit¥82.0B¥62.3B¥60.3B¥57.7B¥56.4B
EBITDA¥48.1B¥34.0B¥31.7B¥31.7B¥33.3B
Net income¥26.1B¥14.3B¥13.4B¥14.3B¥16.5B
Free cash flown/a¥12.1B¥13.0B¥12.8B¥11.6B
Capital expendituren/a¥14.8B¥16.2B¥11.2B¥8.86B
Total debt¥42.0B¥45.0B¥49.1B¥28.7B¥25.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

OSG competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%+20%ELGIEQUIP3015993167603283300457LMW600416SYSR6885430020113899INOXINDIA3000706882576135EPAC3002576136.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. OSG is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×200×400×ELGIEQUIP3167603283MFP300457LMW6004166885433000706882576136.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. OSG is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0%20%40%ELGIEQUIP3015993167MFP300457SYSR0020113899INOXINDIAGRC3000706135EPAC6136.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. OSG is the large dot.

OSG competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6136.T vs KMT vs 5711.T vs 6278.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
OSG 6136.T$1.88B-2%+20%18%11.4×1.7%
Kennametal KMT$1.76B-36%+32%31%8.9×n/a
Mitsubishi Materials 5711.T$3.21B-24%+7%5%3.7×n/a
Union Tool 6278.T$1.20B-41%+40%25%14.8×22.0%
Kyocera 6971.T$23.4B+3%+7%6%22.5×21.3%

How OSG compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

OSG against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6136.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.5%-4.9%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-2.1%-10.4%7th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-24.2%-27.3%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.3%+9.9%5th highest of 21
Operating margin18.2%12.8%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.4×19.9×3rd cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)1.7%11.8%5th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.0%+14.4%4th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-7.3 pp-0.5 pp6th least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.5 pp+2.8 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA6.1×14.4×cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×-0.2×6th least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
OSG 6136.TJapan$1.88B-2%+20%18%11.4×1.7%+9.0%
ELGI Equipments ELGIEQUIP.NSIndia$1.87B-1%+16%13%35.0×30.6%+15.5%
Wuxi Rich Intelligent Equipment 301599.SZChina$1.87B-54%+9%13%n/a31.2%+9.2%
Ta Liang Technology 3167.TWTaiwan$1.89B-9%+103%23%19.6×31.8%+15.9%
Excelland Robotics (Wuxi) 3231.HKHong Kong$1.91Bn/a+19%-36%n/an/an/a
Suzhou Secote Precision Electronic 603283.SSChina$1.92B-12%+9%20%20.2×n/an/a
Midera Food Processing MFPUnited States$1.92Bn/a+11%14%16.4×0.9%+10.5%
Shenzhen Yinghe Technology 300457.SZChina$1.84B-34%+27%6%18.6×11.4%+31.7%
LMW LMW.NSIndia$1.93B+14%+19%4%55.9×n/an/a
Xiangtan Electric Manufacturing 600416.SSChina$1.83B-33%-3%-2%414.0×n/an/a
Systemair SYSR.STSweden$1.83B+16%+3%9%18.6×13.4%+8.0%
Jiangxi Guoke Defence 688543.SSChina$1.83B-7%+2%16%42.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Dun'an Artificial Environment 002011.SZChina$1.81B-4%+8%8%11.4×-0.4%+12.2%
CIMC Enric 3899.HKHong Kong$1.96B-32%+6%4%10.4×-4.7%+15.6%
INOX India INOXINDIA.NSIndia$1.79B+20%+23%18%47.3×37.9%+21.8%
Gorman-Rupp GRCUnited States$1.79B-12%+6%16%21.5×11.8%+14.4%
Beijing OriginWater Technology 300070.SZChina$1.78B-16%-10%5%54.1×17.0%-4.1%
Shareate Tools 688257.SSChina$1.78B-42%+69%25%11.4×n/an/a
Makino Milling Machine 6135.TJapan$1.99B+35%+17%12%10.1×-3.2%+17.5%
Enerpac Tool EPACUnited States$1.99B+9%+6%20%18.8×3.8%+4.3%
Kaishan 300257.SZChina$2.00B-56%+12%15%22.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are OSG's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kennametal (KMT), Mitsubishi Materials (5711.T), Union Tool (6278.T), Kyocera (6971.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ELGI Equipments (ELGIEQUIP.NS), Wuxi Rich Intelligent Equipment (301599.SZ), Ta Liang Technology (3167.TW), Excelland Robotics (Wuxi) (3231.HK), Suzhou Secote Precision Electronic (603283.SS), Midera Food Processing (MFP).
Is OSG expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.4× against a peer median of 19.9×, 3rd cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has OSG stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.1% against -10.4% for the median peer; over one year +40.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.