Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 605339.SS Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. Class A605339.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Staples›Food: Specialty/Candy
Momentum leader 95
Mkt cap
$1.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.39M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-7.7 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
130 days
16 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥15.80
1D+10.0%
1W+16.5%
1M+18.3%
3M+19.7%
6M-1.9%
YTD-19.5%
1Y-6.4%
ATR %4.6%
52w lowhigh32.1% off high

What Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) does

Employees: 1,850

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) at a glance

Size Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) (605339.SS) is a China Consumer Staples company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $1.01B, the 2286th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥15.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.9%, against -8.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.1%); the operating margin is -1.3% (peer median 7.4%).

Valuation It trades at 2.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.3× (6th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.7 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026605339.SS 98Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.98BCN¥3.05BCN¥3.15BCN¥3.07BCN¥2.85B
Revenue growth—-3%+3%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥490MCN¥515MCN¥688MCN¥659MCN¥549M
EBITDACN¥87.1MCN¥131MCN¥303MCN¥330MCN¥257M
Net incomeCN¥7.30MCN¥40.7MCN¥201MCN¥232MCN¥161M
Free cash flow-CN¥256M-CN¥278MCN¥73.9MCN¥290MCN¥124M
Capital expenditureCN¥424MCN¥371MCN¥208MCN¥180MCN¥112M
Total debtCN¥368MCN¥367MCN¥309MCN¥330MCN¥493M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%SENEA0026502815001800F03600866002956300138600127007310WEST004990495860092914752602605339.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%2×4×SENEA0026502815001800F036008660029563001386001272797007310WEST6036094958600929ITM14752602ORKLAINDIA605339.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) is the large dot.

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) competitors and peer comparison

How Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure605339.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+18.3%+0.8%highest of 21
6-month return-1.9%-8.3%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-32.1%-23.7%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.5%+6.1%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-1.3%7.4%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.0×1.3×6th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.7 pp+0.5 pp4th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-7.9×0.8×least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) 605339.SSChina$1.01B-2%-5%-1%2.0×n/an/a
Seneca Foods SENEAUnited States$1.03B+9%+12%9%0.7×-15.1%+2.5%
Jiajia Food 002650.SZChina$983M-25%-3%-11%5.0×1.2%-10.0%
ARIAKE JAPAN 2815.TJapan$1.04B-5%+3%17%1.7×-7.4%+6.1%
ORION 001800.KSSouth Korea$1.06B-4%+15%15%0.8×-16.5%+8.3%
Food Empire F03.SISingapore$952M-22%+14%16%1.5×-9.9%+14.9%
Star Lake Bioscience 600866.SSChina$1.07B-26%-3%0%0.8×n/an/a
Guilin Seamild Foods 002956.SZChina$947M-14%+21%11%2.3×9.0%+17.0%
Chenguang Biotech 300138.SZChina$946M+13%-4%6%1.1×-1.0%+10.9%
JinJian Cereals Industry 600127.SSChina$1.08B+64%+1%-1%2.0×n/an/a
Jiangxi Qiyunshan Food 2797.HKHong Kong$1.10Bn/a-7%17%24.9×n/an/a
Otoki 007310.KSSouth Korea$879M-13%+4%5%0.4×-6.5%+7.2%
Westrock Coffee WESTUnited States$878M+9%+39%0%1.3×n/an/a
Wellhope Foods 603609.SSChina$870M-8%+7%0%0.3×54.2%+8.5%
Lotte 004990.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-27%+1%2%0.8×n/an/a
T. Hasegawa 4958.TJapan$847M+12%+7%12%1.3×-4.8%+7.9%
Snowsky Salt Industry 600929.SSChina$1.20B-29%+32%1%1.4×n/an/a
Italmobiliare ITM.MIItaly$1.20B-8%+8%14%2.1×n/an/a
Nissin Foods 1475.HKHong Kong$834M-14%+1%13%1.2×-13.0%+2.6%
Nisshin OilliO 2602.TJapan$1.22B+13%+8%3%0.5×3.1%+10.5%
Orkla India ORKLAINDIA.NSIndia$826M-12%+6%14%2.7×13.4%+5.3%

Questions

Which companies are Namchow Food Group (Shanghai)'s closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Seneca Foods (SENEA), Jiajia Food (002650.SZ), ARIAKE JAPAN (2815.T), ORION (001800.KS), Food Empire (F03.SI), Star Lake Bioscience (600866.SS), Guilin Seamild Foods (002956.SZ), Chenguang Biotech (300138.SZ).
Is Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.0× against a peer median of 1.3×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.9% against -8.3% for the median peer; over one year -6.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.