Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2815.T ARIAKE JAPAN Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

ARIAKE JAPAN Co., Ltd.2815.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Staples›Food: Specialty/Candy

Maker of natural food seasonings and extracts (bouillon, broth bases) supplied as ingredients to food and foodservice manufacturers.

≈ A B2B natural-flavor ingredient maker akin to a smaller Kerry Group/McCormick ingredients Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$1.04B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
52%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.10M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥5,150
1D-3.4%
1W+0.6%
1M+2.0%
3M-3.4%
6M-5.2%
YTD-2.6%
1Y-8.2%
ATR %2.0%
52w lowhigh16.4% off high

What ARIAKE JAPAN does

Maker of natural food seasonings and extracts (bouillon, broth bases) supplied as ingredients to food and foodservice manufacturers.

Sells extracts by weight to food makers and restaurant groups that build them into soups, sauces and ready meals, so revenue follows their volumes. Once an extract is written into a recipe it is slow to change, which makes orders repeat.

In one line: A B2B natural-flavor ingredient maker akin to a smaller Kerry Group/McCormick ingredients .

Products and services

  • Natural seasoning extracts
  • Bouillon/broth bases

Customers

  • Food manufacturers
  • Foodservice/restaurant chains

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Food & beverage
  • B2B food ingredients
  • Natural extracts, bouillon/broth bases

What could go right

  • Demand for natural/clean-label food ingredients

What could go wrong

  • Raw material (meat/vegetable) cost volatility
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Proprietary natural-extraction processes and long-run B2B ingredient qualification with food makers.

Headquarters: Tosu, Japan · Founded: 1966 · Employees: 1,201

Named competitors

ARIAKE JAPAN at a glance

Size ARIAKE JAPAN (2815.T) is a Japan Consumer Staples company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $1.04B, the 715th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,150 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 5.2%, against -8.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is 17.4% (peer median 5.5%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.2× (7th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262815.T 96Peer median 91
Six months, rebased to 100: ARIAKE JAPAN against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ARIAKE JAPAN financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥67.5B¥67.0B¥65.4B¥60.0B¥55.7B
Revenue growth—+2%+9%+8%—
Gross profit¥20.7B¥20.5B¥19.7B¥16.7B¥16.2B
EBITDA¥14.0B¥14.0B¥13.3B¥10.7B¥10.3B
Net income¥9.19B¥9.46B¥8.21B¥7.35B¥6.39B
Free cash flown/a¥6.74B¥11.2B¥5.78B¥2.58B
Capital expendituren/a¥2.31B¥965M¥3.05B¥3.03B
Total debt¥8.25M¥9.77M¥18.0M¥26.3M¥34.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ARIAKE JAPAN competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%001800SENEA600866605339600127002650F03002956300138004990600929ITM2602007310WESTBIKAJI22012815.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ARIAKE JAPAN is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×60×SENEA600866F03002956300138004990600929ITM2602007310605016603609BIKAJI22012815.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ARIAKE JAPAN is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%0%25%50%001800SENEA002650F030029563001382602007310605016603609BIKAJI22012815.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. ARIAKE JAPAN is the large dot.

ARIAKE JAPAN competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2815.T vs 2802.T vs MKC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
ARIAKE JAPAN 2815.T$1.04B-5%+3%17%17.4×-7.4%
Ajinomoto 2802.T$25.3B-16%+7%11%29.4×19.2%
McCormick & MKC$13.0B0%+13%17%15.9×3.2%

How ARIAKE JAPAN compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ARIAKE JAPAN against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2815.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%+1.1%9th highest of 21
6-month return-5.2%-8.5%8th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-16.4%-27.9%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.1%+7.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin17.4%5.5%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E17.4×18.2×7th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.4%0.1%4th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.1%+9.5%3rd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.6 pp-12.3 pp6th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.8 pp-0.8 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.1×8.2×5th cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-3.7×0.8×2nd least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
ARIAKE JAPAN 2815.TJapan$1.04B-5%+3%17%17.4×-7.4%+6.1%
ORION 001800.KSSouth Korea$1.06B-4%+15%15%n/a-16.5%+8.3%
Seneca Foods SENEAUnited States$1.03B+9%+12%9%10.9×-15.1%+2.5%
Star Lake Bioscience 600866.SSChina$1.07B-26%-3%0%37.2×n/an/a
Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) 605339.SSChina$1.01B-2%-5%-1%n/an/an/a
JinJian Cereals Industry 600127.SSChina$1.08B+64%+1%-1%n/an/an/a
Jiangxi Qiyunshan Food 2797.HKHong Kong$1.10Bn/a-7%17%n/an/an/a
Jiajia Food 002650.SZChina$983M-25%-3%-11%n/a1.2%-10.0%
Food Empire F03.SISingapore$952M-22%+14%16%12.7×-9.9%+14.9%
Guilin Seamild Foods 002956.SZChina$947M-14%+21%11%23.3×9.0%+17.0%
Chenguang Biotech 300138.SZChina$946M+13%-4%6%16.1×-1.0%+10.9%
Lotte 004990.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-27%+1%2%69.5×n/an/a
Snowsky Salt Industry 600929.SSChina$1.20B-29%+32%1%54.7×n/an/a
Italmobiliare ITM.MIItaly$1.20B-8%+8%14%12.0×n/an/a
Nisshin OilliO 2602.TJapan$1.22B+13%+8%3%18.0×3.1%+10.5%
Otoki 007310.KSSouth Korea$879M-13%+4%5%9.4×-6.5%+7.2%
Westrock Coffee WESTUnited States$878M+9%+39%0%n/an/an/a
Shandong Bailong Chuangyuan Bio-Tech 605016.SSChina$1.24B-28%+19%32%18.4×8.8%+22.5%
Wellhope Foods 603609.SSChina$870M-8%+7%0%53.8×54.2%+8.5%
Bikaji Foods International BIKAJI.NSIndia$1.27B-29%+14%10%37.4×38.6%+17.5%
Morinaga & 2201.TJapan$1.28B-8%+3%9%12.3×-5.7%+7.1%

Questions

Who are ARIAKE JAPAN's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ajinomoto (2802.T), McCormick & Company (MKC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ORION (001800.KS), Seneca Foods (SENEA), Star Lake Bioscience (600866.SS), Namchow Food Group (Shanghai) (605339.SS), JinJian Cereals Industry (600127.SS), Jiangxi Qiyunshan Food (2797.HK).
Is ARIAKE JAPAN expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 18.2×, 7th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has ARIAKE JAPAN stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -5.2% against -8.5% for the median peer; over one year -8.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.