Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5871.TW Chailease Holding Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Chailease Holding Co. Ltd.5871.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Financials›Finance/Rental/Leasing

Taiwan's largest equipment leasing and financing company, serving SMEs across Asia.

≈ A smaller Element Fleet-style leasing finance companyMomentum strong 60
Mkt cap
$5.74B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
80%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.6M
20-day average traded
P/B
0.97×
price to book
ROE
11.5%
delivered
Implied ROE
3.8%
what the price asks
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$102.00
1D-2.4%
1W-3.3%
1M-3.3%
3M-8.5%
6M-9.5%
YTD-1.4%
1Y+1.0%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh16.4% off high

What Chailease does

Taiwan's largest equipment leasing and financing company, serving SMEs across Asia.

Lends to small firms by leasing equipment and financing purchases, earning the gap between what it charges and what bonds and bank loans cost it, so credit quality sets profit. It operates across Taiwan, China and Southeast Asia, with China and Taiwan the biggest markets.

In one line: A smaller Element Fleet-style leasing finance company.

Products and services

  • Equipment leasing
  • Installment financing
  • Factoring/other financial services

Customers

  • SMEs (Taiwan, China, SE Asia)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Financial services
  • Equipment leasing & financing
  • SME equipment/vehicle leasing

What could go right

  • SME financing demand growth (China, SE Asia)

What could go wrong

  • Credit/loan loss risk
  • China economic slowdown exposure

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution). Regional scale and local underwriting expertise across multiple Asian SME leasing markets.

Headquarters: Taipei, Taiwan · Founded: 1977

Named competitors

Chailease at a glance

Size Chailease (5871.TW) is a Taiwan Financials company (Finance/Rental/Leasing) with a market value of $5.74B, the 82nd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$102.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.5%, against -2.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.4%); the operating margin is 30.2% (peer median 35.1%).

Valuation It trades at 0.97× book value against a peer median of 2.04× (4th cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 3.8%; Chailease delivers 11.5%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1005871.TW 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Chailease against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Chailease financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$95.9BNT$96.7BNT$102BNT$97.4BNT$86.6B
Revenue growth—-5%+4%+12%—
Gross profitNT$61.8BNT$62.1BNT$66.0BNT$63.8BNT$60.2B
EBITDANT$38.5BNT$37.0BNT$39.0BNT$40.6BNT$43.6B
Net incomeNT$20.1BNT$19.8BNT$22.6BNT$25.0BNT$27.2B
Free cash flowNT$23.6BNT$20.6BNT$20.0B-NT$16.2BNT$17.1B
Capital expenditureNT$622MNT$763MNT$838MNT$1.10BNT$309M
Total debtNT$684BNT$682BNT$693BNT$679BNT$629B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Chailease competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-10%0%+10%+20%EFNSBICARDCACCOMFFIGRHRISUNDARMFIN600901HDBFSBAJAJHFLNNI2588PIRAMALFINLTF000415POONAWALLA84398572OTFENVA5871.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Chailease is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

5%10%15%20%25%10×20×30×EFNSBICARDCACCOMFFIGRHRISUNDARMFIN600901HDBFSBAJAJHFLNNI2588PIRAMALFINLTF000415POONAWALLA84398572OTFENVA5871.TWReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Chailease is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

10%20%30%40%20%40%EFNSBICARDCACCOMFFIGRHRISUNDARMFIN600901HDBFSBAJAJHFLNNI2588PIRAMALFINLTF000415POONAWALLAOTFENVA5871.TWROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Chailease is the large dot.

Chailease competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (5871.TW vs 8439.T vs 8591.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Chailease 5871.TW$5.74B-10%-4%12%0.97×3.8%
Tokyo Century 8439.T$7.50B+12%+8%12%1.01×7.7%
Orix 8591.T$35.7B+2%+17%14%1.26×12.4%

How Chailease compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Chailease against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5871.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.3%+0.4%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-9.5%-2.3%8th lowest of 21
Return on equity11.5%12.4%8th lowest of 21
Price / book0.97×2.04×4th cheapest of 21
Trailing P/E9.1×16.6×4th cheapest of 21
ROE the price implies3.8%22.5%least demanding of 21
ROE delivered11.5%12.4%8th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Chailease 5871.TWTaiwan$5.74B-10%-4%12%0.97×3.8%11.5%
Element Fleet Management EFN.TOCanada$5.61B-31%+5%11%2.06×9.2%10.6%
SBI Cards & Payment Services SBICARD.NSIndia$5.89B-10%+6%16%3.24×40.7%16.3%
Credit Acceptance CACCUnited States$5.37B-1%+2%23%3.86×38.2%22.7%
OneMain OMFUnited States$6.42B0%+6%23%1.90×18.5%22.7%
Figure Technology Solutions FIGRUnited States$5.10B-40%+66%26%3.58×26.5%26.2%
Herc HRIUnited States$5.08B+14%+19%6%2.56×33.3%6.3%
Sundaram Finance SUNDARMFIN.NSIndia$4.95B-11%+14%14%2.89×35.3%14.4%
Jiangsu Financial Leasing 600901.SSChina$6.66B+12%+14%13%1.67×5.9%13.5%
HDB Financial Services HDBFS.NSIndia$4.71B-24%+11%14%2.01×30.2%14.3%
Bajaj Housing Finance BAJAJHFL.NSIndia$7.05B-9%+17%12%2.77×41.1%12.4%
Nelnet NNIUnited States$4.67B+7%-7%8%1.24×10.1%8.1%
BOC Aviation 2588.HKHong Kong$7.09B-3%-2%12%1.01×6.2%11.8%
Piramal Finance PIRAMALFIN.NSIndia$7.17B+13%+71%7%1.58×13.0%6.5%
L&T Finance LTF.NSIndia$7.36B-9%+17%12%2.38×45.8%12.3%
Bohai Leasing 000415.SZChina$4.44B+2%-7%18%0.90×6.3%17.8%
Poonawalla Fincorp POONAWALLA.NSIndia$4.42B+4%+77%9%3.02×47.4%9.2%
Tokyo Century 8439.TJapan$7.50B+12%+8%12%1.01×7.7%11.6%
ACOM 8572.TJapan$4.38B-12%+7%9%0.96×5.6%9.3%
Blue Owl Technology Finance OTFUnited States$4.36B-13%+95%5%0.58×4.9%4.8%
Enova International ENVAUnited States$4.22B-1%+20%27%2.72×26.6%26.8%

Questions

Who are Chailease's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tokyo Century (8439.T), ORIX (8591.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Element Fleet Management (EFN.TO), SBI Cards & Payment Services (SBICARD.NS), Credit Acceptance (CACC), OneMain (OMF), Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR), Herc (HRI).
Is Chailease expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 0.97× against a peer median of 2.04×, 4th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 3.8%; Chailease delivers 11.5%, so the price asks less than the business earns today.
How has Chailease stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.5% against -2.3% for the median peer; over one year +1.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.