Loading…

JMDC Inc.4483.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Data Processing Services

Japanese health-data analytics company aggregating health-insurance claims data for pharma research and personal health records.

≈ A Japanese IQVIA/health-data analytics specialistMomentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$1.52B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
40%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.65M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
31.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.3 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥3,655
1D-5.2%
1W-0.5%
1M-2.0%
3M+21.8%
6M+10.1%
YTD-8.3%
1Y-25.2%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh26.2% off high

What JMDC does

Japanese health-data analytics company aggregating health-insurance claims data for pharma research and personal health records.

Obtains claims data from health-insurance associations, which pay it to analyse the data for programmes that screen health and cut costs, and then sells analysis of the anonymised database to drug makers for studies, so it has two groups of paying customers.

In one line: A Japanese IQVIA/health-data analytics specialist.

Products and services

  • Health insurance claims database (real-world evidence)
  • Personal health record (PHR) platform
  • Data analytics services for pharma

Customers

  • Pharmaceutical companies (real-world evidence stud
  • Health insurance associations
  • Corporate health management programs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Healthcare data & analytics
  • Health insurance claims database & PHR…

What could go right

  • Real-world evidence demand from pharma
  • Corporate preventive-health program growth

What could go wrong

  • Health data privacy/regulatory risk
  • Dependence on health insurance association partnerships

Moat: narrow (data, scale, switching costs). Largest aggregated health-insurance claims database in Japan, difficult for rivals to replicate.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 2002 · Employees: 2,444

Named competitors

JMDC at a glance

Size JMDC (4483.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Data Processing Services) with a market value of $1.52B, the 571st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,655 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.1%, against -36.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 18.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.7%); the operating margin is 19.6% (peer median -1.2%).

Valuation It trades at 31.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.1× (5th most expensive of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.3 points below its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264483.T 109Peer median 58
Six months, rebased to 100: JMDC against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

JMDC financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥52.3B¥50.5B¥41.7B¥30.6B¥27.8B
Revenue growth—+21%+36%+10%—
Gross profit¥28.9B¥26.2B¥22.5B¥17.1B¥14.8B
EBITDA¥13.6B¥13.2B¥10.9B¥8.80B¥7.73B
Net income¥6.93B¥6.76B¥5.96B¥3.32B¥4.27B
Free cash flow¥8.72B¥8.01B¥12.6B-¥910M¥3.24B
Capital expenditure¥2.29B¥2.05B¥3.69B¥2.26B¥1.94B
Total debt¥51.0B¥52.0B¥46.9B¥37.8B¥20.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

JMDC competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%6736CHRNHAWKBTDR300846INOD77113317GLIBADXCBLS300895168638964483.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. JMDC is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×100×200×INOD77110026473317GLIBAVNETDXCBLSIOND3003834483.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. JMDC is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%INOD7711002647GLIBADXCBLS30089516863003834483.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. JMDC is the large dot.

JMDC competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4483.T vs IQV vs 2413.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
JMDC 4483.T$1.52B+10%+19%20%31.9×19.7%
Iqvia IQV$44.8B+52%+9%14%19.7×17.3%
M3 Inc 2413.T$7.78B+20%+9%19%23.5×0.5%

How JMDC compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

JMDC against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4483.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.0%-16.4%6th highest of 21
6-month return+10.1%-36.9%4th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-26.2%-48.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+18.9%+10.7%10th highest of 21
Operating margin19.6%-1.2%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E31.9×19.1×5th most expensive of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.7%10.9%4th most demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+24.6%+10.7%5th highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.0 pp+0.2 pp5th least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.3 pp-7.5 pp5th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA19.1×13.3×4th most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA1.5×1.2×7th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
JMDC 4483.TJapan$1.52B+10%+19%20%31.9×19.7%+24.6%
Suncorporation 6736.TJapan$1.49B+22%-11%1%n/an/an/a
ChronoScale CHRNUnited States$1.57B-31%+190%-68%n/an/an/a
HawkEye 360 HAWKUnited States$1.45B-55%+88%-8%n/an/an/a
Bitdeer Technologies BTDRUnited States$1.63B-55%+128%-30%n/an/an/a
Capitalonline Data Service 300846.SZChina$1.28B-37%0%-7%n/an/an/a
Innodata INODUnited States$1.27B-56%+39%17%37.3×15.9%+34.0%
ASrock Rack 7711.TWTaiwan$1.23B+35%+183%10%15.3×7.5%+42.1%
Rendong 002647.SZChina$1.20B-43%+6%6%19.1×42.3%-17.2%
Shenzhen Xunce Technology 3317.HKHong Kong$1.93B-79%+287%-3%200.1×n/an/a
Keel Infrastructure KEELUnited States$1.15B-53%-23%-121%n/an/an/a
Liberty Capital GLIBAUnited States$1.06B-2%+13%13%8.0×0.8%+113.1%
VNET Group, Inc. Sponsored ADR VNETUnited States$1.00B-64%+23%7%89.6×n/an/a
DXC Technology DXCUnited States$2.31B+58%-3%1%5.8×3.2%-6.5%
BLS International Services BLS.NSIndia$973M-23%+29%23%10.7×9.7%+44.4%
Csquare CSQRUnited States$2.39Bn/a+9%10%n/an/an/a
Beijing Topnew Info & Tech 300895.SZChina$938M-27%+1%-25%n/a54.6%-3.4%
Sunevision 1686.HKHong Kong$2.46B-29%+6%52%14.3×10.9%+10.7%
Kingsoft Cloud 3896.HKHong Kong$2.54B-47%+35%-3%n/an/an/a
Ionic Digital IONDUnited States$2.68Bn/a-8%-44%28.0×n/an/a
Beijing Sinnet Technology 300383.SZChina$2.70B-37%-2%-11%149.7×46.5%-0.7%

Questions

Who are JMDC's main competitors?
Named competitors: IQVIA Holdings (IQV), M3 Inc (2413.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suncorporation (6736.T), ChronoScale (CHRN), HawkEye 360 (HAWK), Bitdeer Technologies (BTDR), Capitalonline Data Service (300846.SZ), Innodata (INOD).
Is JMDC expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 31.9× against a peer median of 19.1×, 5th most expensive of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +25%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has JMDC stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.1% against -36.9% for the median peer; over one year -25.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.