Loading…

M3 Inc2413.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Health Care›Internet Software/Services

Runs an online platform connecting doctors with drug information, clinical trials and medical marketing.

≈ A Sony-backed medical version of a professional network like LinkedIn for doctorsMomentum strong 76
Mkt cap
$7.78B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
58%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$43.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.5 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
-15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥1,806
1D-4.8%
1W-2.1%
1M-1.1%
3M+1.7%
6M+20.1%
YTD-13.4%
1Y-18.7%
ATR %3.5%
52w lowhigh33.3% off high

What M3 Inc does

Runs an online platform connecting doctors with drug information, clinical trials and medical marketing.

Pharmaceutical companies pay to reach its members through online advertising, surveys and clinical-trial recruiting, so revenue follows drug makers' marketing budgets rather than anything doctors pay. Overseas arms add physician networks outside Japan. Sony Group helped start the business and remains a major shareholder.

In one line: A Sony-backed medical version of a professional network like LinkedIn for doctors.

Products and services

  • Physician engagement platform (m3.com)
  • Pharma marketing services
  • Clinical trial support (CRO-like)

Customers

  • Pharmaceutical companies
  • Physicians (platform members)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Digital health
  • Online medical information platform
  • Physician network, pharma marketing…

What could go right

  • Pharma digital marketing shift
  • Global platform expansion

What could go wrong

  • Pharma marketing budget cyclicality

Moat: narrow (network effects, installed base). Large registered physician network creates a two-sided platform hard for new entrants to replicate.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 2000 · Employees: 17,010

Named competitors

M3 Inc at a glance

Size M3 Inc (2413.T) is a Japan Health Care company (Internet Software/Services) with a market value of $7.78B, the 166th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,806 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 20.1%, against +8.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 19.0% (peer median 13.2%).

Valuation It trades at 23.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.6× (5th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.5 points above its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262413.T 121Peer median 109
Six months, rebased to 100: M3 Inc against the median of its 18 peers (local-currency closes).

M3 Inc financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥362B¥351B¥285B¥239B¥231B
Revenue growth—+23%+19%+3%—
Gross profit¥192B¥161B¥144B¥133B¥129B
EBITDAn/a¥87.3B¥73.6B¥74.4B¥77.8B
Net income¥46.4B¥49.1B¥40.5B¥45.3B¥49.0B
Free cash flown/a¥62.6B¥45.5B¥52.9B¥51.2B
Capital expendituren/a¥11.9B¥8.99B¥7.58B¥7.58B
Total debt¥36.5B¥60.5B¥51.4B¥31.8B¥10.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

M3 Inc competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%-20%0%7701686941514528452377474506773345367459450742033349278445439987450369512413.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. M3 Inc is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×30×7701686941514528452377474506773345367459450742034543450369512413.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. M3 Inc is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%77016869415145284523774745067733453674594507278445439987450369512413.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. M3 Inc is the large dot.

M3 Inc competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2413.T vs DOCS vs IQV vs VEEV)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
M3 Inc 2413.T$7.78B+20%+9%19%23.5×0.5%
Doximity DOCS$5.79B+25%+11%31%23.3×16.3%
Iqvia IQV$44.8B+52%+9%14%19.7×17.3%
Veeva Systems VEEV$49.2B+83%+16%30%31.4×24.8%

How M3 Inc compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

M3 Inc against its 18 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2413.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.1%+5.6%4th lowest of 19
6-month return+20.1%+8.8%3rd highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-33.3%-14.8%3rd lowest of 19
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.5%+7.3%8th highest of 19
Operating margin19.0%13.2%6th highest of 19
Forward P/E23.5×15.6×5th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.5%-0.7%9th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.7%+8.9%2nd highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.2 pp-8.2 pp4th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.5 pp+3.5 pp4th highest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
M3 Inc 2413.TJapan$7.78B+20%+9%19%23.5×0.5%+15.7%
Shimadzu 7701.TJapan$7.79B+15%+6%13%19.5×6.3%+7.3%
Sysmex 6869.TJapan$7.89B+50%+4%13%31.2×4.4%+10.4%
Kyowa Kirin 4151.TJapan$8.05B+4%+10%24%15.6×-6.1%+9.3%
ONO Pharmaceutical 4528.TJapan$7.01B+2%-2%22%14.7×-8.2%+10.8%
Eisai 4523.TJapan$8.68B+4%+7%5%24.2×11.8%+5.0%
Asahi Intecc 7747.TJapan$6.28B+13%+21%31%26.0×13.6%+18.8%
Sumitomo Pharma 4506.TJapan$5.23B+7%+11%10%8.3×1.4%-2.6%
Olympus 7733.TJapan$12.2B+13%+8%16%18.0×-1.5%+6.7%
Santen Pharmaceutical 4536.TJapan$3.86B+17%-1%16%15.6×-5.2%+3.2%
MEDIPAL 7459.TJapan$3.67B+14%+4%1%12.6×-7.4%+3.5%
Shionogi & 4507.TJapan$16.6B-6%+46%29%10.9×-0.7%+11.0%
Sumitomo Bakelite 4203.TJapan$3.31B+15%+15%13%14.9×6.8%+8.9%
COSMOS Pharmaceutical 3349.TJapan$3.20B+5%+9%4%15.7×n/an/a
Alfresa 2784.TJapan$2.79B-3%+5%1%17.4×-9.1%+3.5%
Terumo 4543.TJapan$23.4B+25%+14%17%24.6×8.7%+13.0%
Suzuken 9987.TJapan$2.29B-9%+5%1%15.0×-11.9%+3.2%
Astellas Pharma 4503.TJapan$28.2B+11%+19%23%11.6×-11.0%+11.4%
JEOL 6951.TJapan$1.98B-3%-18%11%14.2×21.3%+10.2%

Questions

Who are M3 Inc's main competitors?
Named competitors: Doximity (DOCS), IQVIA (IQV), Veeva Systems (VEEV). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Shimadzu (7701.T), Sysmex (6869.T), Kyowa Kirin (4151.T), ONO Pharmaceutical (4528.T), Eisai (4523.T), Asahi Intecc (7747.T).
Is M3 Inc expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.5× against a peer median of 15.6×, 5th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has M3 Inc stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +20.1% against +8.8% for the median peer; over one year -18.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.