Loading…

Innodata Inc.INODCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Data Processing Services

US data-engineering company that prepares, labels and generates training data for AI model developers.

Momentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$1.27B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$90.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 19.8%
Hurdle
-18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$37.03
1D-4.1%
1W-15.5%
1M-39.5%
3M-40.5%
6M-56.4%
YTD-27.3%
1Y-42.8%
ATR %12.7%
Beta3.28
52w lowhigh70.4% off high

What Innodata does

US data-engineering company that prepares, labels and generates training data for AI model developers.

Charges for the human and software effort of labelling and generating training data, mostly under contracts with a small number of very large technology companies, so one customer's budget can swing revenue sharply. Began in 1988 as a data-conversion contractor for publishers, now overshadowed.

Products and services

  • AI data annotation and labeling
  • Data curation and collection
  • Synthetic data generation
  • Digital/content engineering (legacy)

Customers

  • Large AI model developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Software/AI services
  • Data engineering for AI
  • Data annotation, curation…

What could go right

  • Growing AI-training data spend by big tech

What could go wrong

  • Heavy revenue concentration in a few large customers
  • Commoditization risk in data-labeling

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, scale, process know-how). Deep, long-standing relationships with a few large AI customers give recurring work, but customer concentration is high.

Headquarters: Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, US · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 10,107

Named competitors

  • Appen private or unlisted
  • TELUS International private or unlisted

Innodata at a glance

Size Innodata (INOD) is a United States Information Technology company (Data Processing Services) with a market value of $1.27B, the 2098th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $37.03 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.4%, against -26.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 39.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +15.7%); the operating margin is 17.1% (peer median 0.9%).

Valuation It trades at 37.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.3× (3rd most expensive of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +34%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Short interest Short interest is 13.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 74INOD 36
Six months, rebased to 100: Innodata against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Innodata financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$317M$252M$170M$86.8M$79.0M
Revenue growth—+48%+96%+10%—
Gross profit$134M$99.8M$67.3M$31.9M$27.7M
EBITDA$62.4M$47.1M$30.4M$5.66M-$6.39M
Net income$46.5M$32.2M$28.7M-$908,000-$11.9M
Free cash flow$184M$35.6M$27.1M$339,000-$7.74M
Capital expenditure$12.4M$11.1M$7.74M$5.56M$6.53M
Total debt$3.83M$4.43M$4.66M$5.48M$4.73M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Innodata competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%3008467711002647KEELHAWK67364483GLIBACHRNVNETBTDRBLS3008953317688228SHAZYEXTPSIDXC3778INOD6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Innodata is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×100×200×77110026474483GLIBAVNETBLS3317YEXTINODRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Innodata is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%0%50%100%77110026474483GLIBABLS300895688228YEXTPSIDXCINODGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Innodata is the large dot.

Innodata competitors and peer comparison

How Innodata compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Innodata against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureINODPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-39.5%-9.9%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-56.4%-26.5%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-70.4%-48.2%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+39.0%+15.7%7th highest of 21
Operating margin17.1%0.9%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E37.3×15.3×3rd most expensive of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.9%9.7%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+34.0%+14.3%4th highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-18.1 pp-0.0 pp5th least demanding of 11
EV / EBITDA16.5×11.1×4th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-4.0×1.6×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Innodata INODUnited States$1.27B-56%+39%17%37.3×15.9%+34.0%
Capitalonline Data Service 300846.SZChina$1.28B-37%0%-7%n/an/an/a
ASrock Rack 7711.TWTaiwan$1.23B+35%+183%10%15.3×7.5%+42.1%
Rendong 002647.SZChina$1.20B-43%+6%6%19.1×42.3%-17.2%
Keel Infrastructure KEELUnited States$1.15B-53%-23%-121%n/an/an/a
HawkEye 360 HAWKUnited States$1.45B-55%+88%-8%n/an/an/a
Suncorporation 6736.TJapan$1.49B+22%-11%1%n/an/an/a
JMDC 4483.TJapan$1.52B+10%+19%20%31.9×19.7%+24.6%
Liberty Capital GLIBAUnited States$1.06B-2%+13%13%8.0×0.8%+113.1%
ChronoScale CHRNUnited States$1.57B-31%+190%-68%n/an/an/a
VNET Group, Inc. Sponsored ADR VNETUnited States$1.00B-64%+23%7%89.6×n/an/a
Bitdeer Technologies BTDRUnited States$1.63B-55%+128%-30%n/an/an/a
BLS International Services BLS.NSIndia$973M-23%+29%23%10.7×9.7%+44.4%
Beijing Topnew Info & Tech 300895.SZChina$938M-27%+1%-25%n/a54.6%-3.4%
Shenzhen Xunce Technology 3317.HKHong Kong$1.93B-79%+287%-3%200.1×n/an/a
Ucap Cloud Information Technology 688228.SSChina$786M-26%-39%-14%n/a39.9%+6.8%
SharonAI SHAZUnited States$781M-59%+257%-894%n/an/an/a
Yext YEXTUnited States$749M+88%-1%10%10.0×9.6%+4.7%
Pason Systems PSI.TOCanada$742M-10%-2%18%12.4×1.5%+21.8%
DXC Technology DXCUnited States$2.31B+58%-3%1%5.8×3.2%-6.5%
SAKURA Internet 3778.TJapan$688M-13%+26%8%35.7×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Innodata's main competitors?
Named competitors: Appen (private or unlisted), TELUS International (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Capitalonline Data Service (300846.SZ), ASrock Rack (7711.TW), Rendong (002647.SZ), Keel Infrastructure (KEEL), HawkEye 360 (HAWK), Suncorporation (6736.T).
Is Innodata expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.3× against a peer median of 15.3×, 3rd most expensive of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +34%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Innodata stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.4% against -26.5% for the median peer; over one year -42.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.