Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 420770.KS GigaVis Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

GigaVis Co., Ltd.420770.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Components

Recently listed Korean maker of inspection/testing equipment for semiconductor packages and substrates.

Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$583M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.5 pp
WACC 11.5%
Hurdle
+40 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩62,400
1D-9.2%
1W-32.9%
1M-53.9%
3M-45.6%
6M-39.9%
YTD+98.1%
1Y+81.9%
ATR %18.0%
52w lowhigh69.7% off high

What GigaVis does

Recently listed Korean maker of inspection/testing equipment for semiconductor packages and substrates.

Products and services

  • Semiconductor package inspection systems

Customers

  • Semiconductor packaging/OSAT companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductor equipment
  • Package/substrate inspection equipment

What could go right

  • Advanced-packaging capex growth (AI chips)

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how). Niche inspection-equipment maker qualified into semiconductor packaging lines.

Headquarters: South Korea · Employees: 138

Named competitors

GigaVis at a glance

Size GigaVis (420770.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $583M, the 309th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩62,400 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 39.9%, against -18.8% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 176.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.7%); the operating margin is 26.2% (peer median 3.2%).

Valuation It trades at 25.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.9× (4th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +40 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.5 points above its cost of capital (11.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80420770.KS 57
Six months, rebased to 100: GigaVis against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

GigaVis financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩67.2B₩52.4B₩26.1B₩91.4B₩99.7B
Revenue growth—+101%-71%-8%—
Gross profit₩35.2B₩27.9B₩11.7B₩52.9B₩57.5B
EBITDA₩18.5B₩12.9B-₩1.00B₩35.7B₩34.4B
Net income₩21.0B₩15.5B₩3.41B₩32.7B₩27.8B
Free cash flow₩358M₩21.0B-₩28.9B₩8.73B₩34.6B
Capital expenditure₩14.5B₩5.51B₩32.7B₩5.03B₩1.20B
Total debt₩20.0B₩20.0B₩20.0B₩0₩0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

GigaVis competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%-25%0%+25%688307FTG688609LBIRDVPG0018200653502355002449301517370762692316002134804200218967823006916683420770.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. GigaVis is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%20×40×688307FTG688609LBIRDVPG001820235537076269SMOP6782420770.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. GigaVis is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%FTG688609LBIRDVPG0018202355SMOP6683420770.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. GigaVis is the large dot.

GigaVis competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (420770.KS vs KLAC vs ONTO vs 098460.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
GigaVis 420770.KS$583M-40%+176%26%25.1×34.7%
KLA KLAC$180B-26%+16%43%22.3×23.5%
ONTO ONTO$8.50B-39%+8%20%16.9×29.4%
Koh Young Technology 098460.KS$987M-49%+57%15%25.1×20.5%

How GigaVis compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

GigaVis against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure420770.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-53.9%-11.3%lowest of 21
6-month return-39.9%-18.8%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-69.7%-43.7%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+176.0%+17.7%highest of 21
Operating margin26.2%3.2%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E25.1×27.9×4th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)34.7%25.4%4th most demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)-5.1%+7.8%lowest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+39.8 pp+13.1 pp3rd most demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.5 pp-5.5 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA36.5×25.2×2nd most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-6.2×0.3×least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
GigaVis 420770.KSSouth Korea$583M-40%+176%26%25.1×34.7%-5.1%
Jiaxing ZMAX Optech 688307.SSChina$584M-51%+59%7%25.7×n/an/a
Firan Technology FTG.TOCanada$585M+55%+17%12%27.9×24.6%+13.0%
Unionman Technology 688609.SSChina$586M-26%+18%-1%8.8×45.5%+3.4%
Lumibird LBIRD.PAFrance$589M-4%+8%11%26.9×18.6%+12.2%
Vishay Precision VPGUnited States$589M-34%+12%2%31.9×52.2%+2.6%
Samwha Capacitor 001820.KSSouth Korea$590M+16%+1%5%29.2×39.1%+4.0%
Shinsung Delta Tech 065350.KSSouth Korea$572M-51%+10%3%n/an/an/a
Chin-Poon Industrial 2355.TWTaiwan$568M-9%+1%4%23.3×7.2%+0.6%
Foshan Nationstar Optoelectronics 002449.SZChina$557M-24%-17%-6%n/an/an/a
Shaanxi Huada Science Technology 301517.SZChina$554M-54%-9%-26%n/an/an/a
Episil Technologies 3707.TWOTaiwan$616M-33%+23%-3%50.9×n/an/a
Flexium Interconnect 6269.TWTaiwan$617M-5%+1%-34%52.0×n/an/a
WUS Printed Circuit 2316.TWTaiwan$549M-15%+24%-11%n/an/an/a
Tianjin Printronics Circuit 002134.SZChina$628M-34%+31%6%n/an/an/a
Taiwan Chinsan Electronic Industrial 8042.TWOTaiwan$541M+82%+22%7%32.7×n/an/a
Smartoptics SMOP.OLNorway$530M-8%+45%14%42.5×15.2%+19.1%
Costar 002189.SZChina$642M-22%+18%-14%n/an/an/a
Visco Vision 6782.TWTaiwan$523M+23%+23%29%13.1×n/an/a
Union Optech 300691.SZChina$650M-16%+13%0%n/an/an/a
Keystone Microtech 6683.TWOTaiwan$652M-70%+25%27%26.7×26.2%+11.7%

Questions

Who are GigaVis's main competitors?
Named competitors: KLA Corporation (KLAC), Onto Innovation (ONTO), Koh Young Technology (098460.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiaxing ZMAX Optech (688307.SS), Firan Technology (FTG.TO), Unionman Technology (688609.SS), Lumibird (LBIRD.PA), Vishay Precision (VPG), Samwha Capacitor (001820.KS).
Is GigaVis expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.1× against a peer median of 27.9×, 4th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -5%, so the hurdle is +40 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has GigaVis stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -39.9% against -18.8% for the median peer; over one year +81.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.