Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3707.TWO Episil Technologies Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Episil Technologies Inc.3707.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Electronic Components
Momentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$616M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
50.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-11.4 pp
WACC 9.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · TWDNT$50.90
1D-7.5%
1W-21.7%
1M-40.3%
3M-14.9%
6M-32.6%
YTD-1.7%
1Y-22.3%
ATR %9.0%
52w lowhigh49.4% off high

What Episil Technologies does

No business profile yet.

Episil Technologies at a glance

Size Episil Technologies (3707.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $616M, the 381st largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$50.90 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.6%, against -25.3% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.1%); the operating margin is -2.7% (peer median 4.3%).

Valuation It trades at 50.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.2× (3rd most expensive of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.4 points below its cost of capital (9.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 733707.TWO 70
Six months, rebased to 100: Episil Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Episil Technologies financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$6.87BNT$5.77BNT$5.82BNT$7.08BNT$8.88B
Revenue growth—-1%-18%-20%—
Gross profitNT$1.18B-NT$190MNT$38.7MNT$808MNT$1.73B
EBITDAn/a-NT$36.2MNT$31.6MNT$840MNT$1.74B
Net income-NT$355M-NT$757M-NT$525MNT$67.1MNT$821M
Free cash flown/a-NT$1.58B-NT$1.06B-NT$699MNT$582M
Capital expendituren/aNT$1.59BNT$1.41BNT$1.47BNT$1.16B
Total debtn/aNT$2.16BNT$2.61BNT$2.31BNT$2.23B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Episil Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%6269002134002189001820VPGLBIRD688609FTG3006916883076683420770301120065350694130156614780024493707.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Episil Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%25×50×75×6269001820VPGLBIRD6886096883074207703011202355694168043707.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Episil Technologies is the large dot.

Episil Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Episil Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Episil Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3707.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-40.3%-13.8%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.6%-25.3%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-49.4%-49.9%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.7%+18.1%9th highest of 21
Operating margin-2.7%4.3%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E50.9×26.2×3rd most expensive of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.4 pp-2.6 pp3rd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Episil Technologies 3707.TWOTaiwan$616M-33%+23%-3%50.9×n/an/a
Flexium Interconnect 6269.TWTaiwan$617M-5%+1%-34%52.0×n/an/a
Tianjin Printronics Circuit 002134.SZChina$628M-34%+31%6%n/an/an/a
Costar 002189.SZChina$642M-22%+18%-14%n/an/an/a
Samwha Capacitor 001820.KSSouth Korea$590M+16%+1%5%29.2×39.1%+4.0%
Vishay Precision VPGUnited States$589M-34%+12%2%31.9×52.2%+2.6%
Lumibird LBIRD.PAFrance$589M-4%+8%11%26.9×18.6%+12.2%
Unionman Technology 688609.SSChina$586M-26%+18%-1%8.8×45.5%+3.4%
Firan Technology FTG.TOCanada$585M+55%+17%12%27.9×24.6%+13.0%
Union Optech 300691.SZChina$650M-16%+13%0%n/an/an/a
Jiaxing ZMAX Optech 688307.SSChina$584M-51%+59%7%25.7×n/an/a
Keystone Microtech 6683.TWOTaiwan$652M-70%+25%27%26.7×26.2%+11.7%
GigaVis 420770.KSSouth Korea$583M-40%+176%26%25.1×34.7%-5.1%
Newonder Special Electric 301120.SZChina$654M-39%+22%1%91.7×56.0%+4.2%
Shinsung Delta Tech 065350.KSSouth Korea$572M-51%+10%3%n/an/an/a
Chin-Poon Industrial 2355.TWTaiwan$568M-9%+1%4%23.3×7.2%+0.6%
Yamaichi Electronics 6941.TJapan$670M-45%+29%24%9.5×4.7%+13.7%
Dalian Dalicap Technology 301566.SZChina$670M-20%+41%45%n/a18.4%+10.8%
Q Technology (Group) 1478.HKHong Kong$674M-50%+31%3%6.9×n/an/a
Hosiden 6804.TJapan$675M-24%+41%5%8.0×-18.5%+13.9%
Foshan Nationstar Optoelectronics 002449.SZChina$557M-24%-17%-6%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Episil Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Flexium Interconnect (6269.TW), Tianjin Printronics Circuit (002134.SZ), Costar (002189.SZ), Samwha Capacitor (001820.KS), Vishay Precision (VPG), Lumibird (LBIRD.PA), Unionman Technology (688609.SS), Firan Technology (FTG.TO).
Is Episil Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 50.9× against a peer median of 26.2×, 3rd most expensive of 15 in its peer set.
How has Episil Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.6% against -25.3% for the median peer; over one year -22.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.