Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4063.T Shin-etsu Chemical CoOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shin-etsu Chemical Co4063.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

World's largest maker of silicon wafers for chips, plus PVC resin and silicone materials.

≈ A wafer-monopolist chemicals conglomerateMomentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$66.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$254M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.3 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥5,312
1D-6.7%
1W-11.6%
1M-16.0%
3M-9.1%
6M-26.7%
YTD+10.0%
1Y+8.5%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh33.0% off high

What Shin-etsu Chemical does

World's largest maker of silicon wafers for chips, plus PVC resin and silicone materials.

Sells silicon wafers to chipmakers, mostly under long-term supply agreements, alongside a very different business in PVC plastic, made largely in the US through its Shintech subsidiary, and silicones. Wafers follow chip-industry spending, while PVC follows construction.

In one line: A wafer-monopolist chemicals conglomerate.

Products and services

  • Semiconductor silicon wafers
  • PVC/chlor-alkali
  • Silicones
  • Rare-earth magnets

Customers

  • Chipmakers (TSMC, Samsung, Intel)
  • Construction/PVC customers
  • Electronics makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Specialty chemicals
  • Semiconductor silicon + silicones + PVC

What could go right

  • Semiconductor capex upcycle (AI chips)
  • PVC/construction demand in emerging markets

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • PVC/commodity chemical price cycles

Moat: wide (scale, process know-how, customer qualification). Global #1 in semiconductor silicon wafers; costly for chipmakers to requalify a wafer supplier.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1926 · Employees: 27,342

Named competitors

Shin-etsu Chemical at a glance

Size Shin-etsu Chemical (4063.T) is a Japan Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $66.5B, the 22nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,312 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.7%, against +2.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 13 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.3%); the operating margin is 25.4% (peer median 19.6%).

Valuation It trades at 17.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.1× (6th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points above its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1024063.T 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Shin-etsu Chemical against the median of its 12 peers (local-currency closes).

Shin-etsu Chemical financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥2.71T¥2.57T¥2.56T¥2.41T¥2.81T
Revenue growth—0%+6%-14%—
Gross profit¥936B¥877B¥981B¥906B¥1.21T
EBITDA¥930B¥878B¥980B¥929B¥1.21T
Net income¥504B¥474B¥534B¥520B¥708B
Free cash flow¥468B¥359B¥442B¥381B¥492B
Capital expenditure¥309B¥356B¥443B¥377B¥299B
Total debt¥402B¥259B¥33.9B¥41.2B¥47.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shin-etsu Chemical competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%APDBASECLAINSIS-BEMSN600989DOWLYB600111LIN6003464063.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shin-etsu Chemical is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×40×APDBASECLAINSIS-BEMSN600989DOWLYB600111LIN6003464063.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shin-etsu Chemical is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%BASECLAINSIS-BEMSN600989DOWLYB600111LIN6003464063.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shin-etsu Chemical is the large dot.

Shin-etsu Chemical competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4063.T vs 3436.T vs WCH.DE vs 6488.TWO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shin-etsu Chemical 4063.T$66.5B-27%+5%25%17.2×8.9%
Sumco 3436.T$3.96B-28%+4%-4%n/an/a
Wacker Chemie WCH.DE$4.42B-24%-5%-1%33.0×n/a
GlobalWafers 6488.TWO$8.15B-23%-6%11%21.4×n/a
Siltronic WAF.DE$1.86B-46%+1%-16%n/an/a

How Shin-etsu Chemical compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shin-etsu Chemical against its 12 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4063.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.0%+6.0%lowest of 13
6-month return-26.7%+2.8%3rd lowest of 13
Distance from 52-week high-33.0%-6.0%4th lowest of 13
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.1%+4.3%5th highest of 13
Operating margin25.4%19.6%4th highest of 13
Forward P/E17.2×24.1×6th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.9%8.6%6th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.4%+5.1%4th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.5 pp+5.6 pp5th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.3 pp+1.5 pp5th highest of 13
EV / EBITDA10.0×19.1×4th cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.4×2.0×least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shin-etsu Chemical 4063.TJapan$66.5B-27%+5%25%17.2×8.9%+11.4%
Air Products APDUnited States$67.9B+4%+5%24%21.2×n/an/a
Basf BAS.DEGermany$52.6B+2%-4%7%16.8×5.7%+0.2%
Ecolab ECLUnited States$84.3B+19%+9%18%33.6×19.7%+6.4%
Air Liquide AI.PAFrance$134B+15%-1%21%29.0×18.1%+5.6%
Novonesis A/S NSIS-B.CODenmark$32.1B+22%+5%21%30.0×13.2%+17.2%
Ems-chemie EMSN.SWSwitzerland$24.3B+28%-3%30%39.4×8.6%+1.6%
Ningxia Baofeng Energy 600989.SSChina$23.4B-31%+35%35%8.4×-7.8%+24.8%
Dow DOWUnited States$22.7B-14%+4%5%14.8×4.3%+0.7%
LyondellBasell LYBUnited States$19.6B-15%-2%10%9.5×-10.3%+1.7%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech 600111.SSChina$19.6B-31%+29%11%28.5×24.6%+14.2%
Linde LINUnited States$237B+5%+8%27%27.0×14.4%+4.5%
Hengli Petrochemical 600346.SSChina$17.5B-25%-8%8%9.2×-8.0%+5.1%

Questions

Who are Shin-etsu Chemical's main competitors?
Named competitors: SUMCO (3436.T), Wacker Chemie (WCH.DE), GlobalWafers (6488.TWO), Siltronic (WAF.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Air Products (APD), Basf (BAS.DE), Ecolab (ECL), Air Liquide (AI.PA), Novonesis A/S (NSIS-B.CO), Ems-chemie (EMSN.SW).
Is Shin-etsu Chemical expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.2× against a peer median of 24.1×, 6th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Shin-etsu Chemical stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.7% against +2.8% for the median peer; over one year +8.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.