Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4046.T Osaka Soda Co.,ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Osaka Soda Co.,ltd.4046.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Japanese specialty chemicals maker producing chlor-alkali products, epoxy/allyl compounds and functional polymers.

Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$1.52B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.26M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.7 pp
WACC 9.8%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥1,835
1D-3.2%
1W-5.7%
1M-14.6%
3M+3.4%
6M-1.9%
YTD-15.3%
1Y+12.3%
ATR %3.7%
52w lowhigh27.6% off high

What Osaka Soda does

Japanese specialty chemicals maker producing chlor-alkali products, epoxy/allyl compounds and functional polymers.

Products and services

  • Chlor-alkali products
  • Epoxy/allyl specialty chemicals
  • Functional polymers

Customers

  • Industrial chemical manufacturers
  • Plastics/coatings producers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Specialty chemicals
  • Chlor-alkali & functional polymer…

What could go right

  • Industrial/coatings chemical demand

What could go wrong

  • Feedstock/energy cost volatility
  • Commoditized chemical pricing

Moat: narrow (process know-how). Niche specialty-chemical manufacturing know-how in a competitive commodity-adjacent segment.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 1915 · Employees: 1,032

Named competitors

Osaka Soda at a glance

Size Osaka Soda (4046.T) is a Japan Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $1.52B, the 572nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,835 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.9%, against -21.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.4%); the operating margin is 19.1% (peer median 7.4%).

Valuation It trades at 13.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.0× (7th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points above its cost of capital (9.8% WACC).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264046.T 99Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Osaka Soda against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Osaka Soda financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥104B¥100.0B¥96.4B¥94.6B¥104B
Revenue growth—+4%+2%-9%—
Gross profit¥36.4B¥33.4B¥28.8B¥24.5B¥30.2B
EBITDA¥24.5B¥22.0B¥17.8B¥14.2B¥19.0B
Net income¥17.4B¥15.5B¥10.3B¥7.65B¥10.6B
Free cash flown/a¥13.3B¥10.3B¥3.48B¥4.58B
Capital expendituren/a¥7.39B¥7.56B¥5.36B¥5.11B
Total debt¥7.70B¥7.83B¥8.40B¥8.51B¥8.58B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Osaka Soda competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%SCL4061011780600063SHAILYPRLBGEL011170ELM6883783004090021676035994043CHAMBLFERT3007416003666038264046.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Osaka Soda is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%0×20×40×60×6745SCL4061011780600063000553SHAILYPRLBELM6883783004090021676035994043CHAMBLFERT6003666038264046.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Osaka Soda is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%6745SCL011780000553SHAILYPRLBGELELM6883780021676035993007416003666038264046.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Osaka Soda is the large dot.

Osaka Soda competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (4046.T vs 8012.T vs 4118.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Osaka Soda 4046.T$1.52B-2%+8%19%13.5×5.1%
Nagase & 8012.T$2.96B-9%+8%5%10.9×3.5%
Kaneka 4118.T$2.30B+23%+4%5%11.6×4.9%

How Osaka Soda compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Osaka Soda against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4046.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.6%-14.3%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-1.9%-21.4%6th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-27.6%-41.2%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.1%+8.4%11th highest of 21
Operating margin19.1%7.4%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E13.5×19.0×7th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.1%16.9%7th least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.5%+4.5%5th lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.5 pp+10.4 pp8th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.7 pp-2.2 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.3×8.5×5th cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.4×1.7×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Osaka Soda 4046.TJapan$1.52B-2%+8%19%13.5×5.1%+0.5%
Befar 6745.HKHong Kong$1.52Bn/a+25%5%9.7×3.6%+17.3%
Stepan SCLUnited States$1.52B+26%+10%4%19.0×14.9%+4.5%
Denka 4061.TJapan$1.51B-33%-3%9%12.7×n/an/a
KumhoPetrochem 011780.KSSouth Korea$1.50B-37%0%7%4.3×-16.5%+7.5%
Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry 600063.SSChina$1.49B-32%+3%4%20.0×n/an/a
ADAMA 000553.SZChina$1.55B-33%-6%3%30.7×-7.2%+0.3%
Shaily Engineering Plastics SHAILY.NSIndia$1.48B+14%+18%24%56.7×35.8%+22.8%
Proto Labs PRLBUnited States$1.57B-5%+12%8%27.4×26.8%+4.2%
Genesis Energy, L.P GELUnited States$1.57B-21%-17%19%n/a2.2%-2.2%
LOTTE CHEMICAL 011170.KSSouth Korea$1.45B-59%+5%-2%n/an/an/a
Elementis ELM.LUnited Kingdom$1.45B+34%-12%20%16.9×16.9%-4.8%
Jilin OLED Material Tech 688378.SSChina$1.45B-17%+74%18%28.1×46.2%+15.2%
Guangdong Dowstone Technology 300409.SZChina$1.59B-50%+34%6%14.0×n/an/a
Guangdong Orient Zirconic Industry Science & Technology 002167.SZChina$1.44B+5%+17%14%48.5×32.4%+10.1%
Anhui Guangxin Agrochemical 603599.SSChina$1.43B-29%-13%18%13.1×-3.8%+0.6%
Tokuyama 4043.TJapan$1.63B-11%+7%9%5.8×1.1%+2.9%
Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals CHAMBLFERT.NSIndia$1.63B-15%+6%12%7.2×n/an/a
Huabao Technology 300741.SZChina$1.63B+7%+17%1%n/a45.3%-8.5%
Ningbo Yunsheng 600366.SSChina$1.64B-24%+33%6%19.3×19.1%+17.9%
Fujian Kuncai Material Technology 603826.SSChina$1.64B-51%+59%5%61.0×24.1%+11.0%

Questions

Who are Osaka Soda's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nagase & Co (8012.T), Kaneka Corporation (4118.T), Daiso Co (private) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Befar (6745.HK), Stepan (SCL), Denka (4061.T), KumhoPetrochem (011780.KS), Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry (600063.SS), ADAMA (000553.SZ).
Is Osaka Soda expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.5× against a peer median of 19.0×, 7th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Osaka Soda stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.9% against -21.4% for the median peer; over one year +12.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.