Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 011780.KS KumhoPetrochemOpen in the cockpit ↗

KumhoPetrochem011780.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Materials›Chemicals: Specialty

Korean petrochemical maker of synthetic rubber (for tires) and EPDM/resins, a former Kumho Asiana Group flagship.

Momentum neutral 40
Mkt cap
$1.50B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.66M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 6.0%
Hurdle
-24 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · KRW₩92,500
1D-17.3%
1W-13.3%
1M-20.2%
3M-20.9%
6M-36.9%
YTD-23.4%
1Y-20.8%
ATR %5.7%
52w lowhigh43.0% off high

What KumhoPetrochem does

Korean petrochemical maker of synthetic rubber (for tires) and EPDM/resins, a former Kumho Asiana Group flagship.

Sells synthetic rubber mainly to tire makers, so earnings track tire output and the gap between rubber prices and the cost of feedstocks such as butadiene, a petrochemical raw material. A large part of volume is exported.

Products and services

  • Synthetic rubber (SBR/BR)
  • EPDM
  • Synthetic resins/latex

Customers

  • Tire makers
  • Rubber/plastics processors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Petrochemicals
  • Synthetic rubber (SBR/BR, EPDM)
  • Tire & industrial rubber supply chain

What could go right

  • Tire industry demand growth
  • EPDM demand in construction/auto

What could go wrong

  • Petrochemical margin cyclicality
  • Feedstock (butadiene) price swings

Moat: narrow (scale). Large-scale synthetic rubber producer with global export reach.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1970 · Employees: 1,606

Named competitors

KumhoPetrochem at a glance

Size KumhoPetrochem (011780.KS) is a South Korea Materials company (Chemicals: Specialty) with a market value of $1.50B, the 170th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩92,500 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.9%, against -16.0% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is 6.7% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 4.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.3× (cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -24 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (6.0% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 83011780.KS 64
Six months, rebased to 100: KumhoPetrochem against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

KumhoPetrochem financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩7.28T₩6.92T₩7.16T₩6.32T₩7.98T
Revenue growth—-3%+13%-21%—
Gross profit₩827B₩590B₩573B₩636B₩1.42T
EBITDA₩808B₩588B₩547B₩611B₩1.39T
Net income₩505B₩291B₩349B₩447B₩1.02T
Free cash flow₩337B₩521B-₩114B₩40.9B₩85.8B
Capital expenditure₩135B₩196B₩437B₩590B₩428B
Total debt₩864B₩1.01T₩945B₩883B₩797B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

KumhoPetrochem competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%40616016784046600063SCLSHAILY000553011170ELM688378002167PRLBGEL6035993004093005760028380027414043CHAMBLFERT011780.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. KumhoPetrochem is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%0×20×40×60×40616016784046600063SHAILY000553ELM688378002167PRLB6035993004090028380027414043CHAMBLFERT011780.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. KumhoPetrochem is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%6016784046SCLSHAILY000553ELM688378002167PRLBGEL603599011780.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. KumhoPetrochem is the large dot.

KumhoPetrochem competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (011780.KS vs 011170.KS vs 051910.KS vs 4205.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
KumhoPetrochem 011780.KS$1.50B-37%0%7%4.3×-16.5%
LOTTE CHEMICAL 011170.KS$1.45B-59%+5%-2%n/an/a
Lgchem 051910.KS$12.6B-42%0%0%n/an/a
Zeon 4205.T$2.34B+6%+4%11%9.1×-1.5%

How KumhoPetrochem compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

KumhoPetrochem against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure011780.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.2%-14.8%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-36.9%-16.0%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.0%-40.5%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.5%+9.1%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.7%8.8%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E4.3×19.3×cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-16.5%10.0%least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.5%+3.6%5th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-24.1 pp+7.5 pp2nd least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp-1.9 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA2.4×8.5×cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×1.7×3rd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
KumhoPetrochem 011780.KSSouth Korea$1.50B-37%0%7%4.3×-16.5%+7.5%
Denka 4061.TJapan$1.51B-33%-3%9%12.7×n/an/a
Befar 601678.SSChina$1.51B-14%+19%5%21.8×-6.4%+18.2%
Osaka Soda 4046.TJapan$1.52B-2%+8%19%13.5×5.1%+0.5%
Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry 600063.SSChina$1.49B-32%+3%4%20.0×n/an/a
Stepan SCLUnited States$1.52B+26%+10%4%19.0×14.9%+4.5%
Shaily Engineering Plastics SHAILY.NSIndia$1.48B+14%+18%24%56.7×35.8%+22.8%
ADAMA 000553.SZChina$1.55B-33%-6%3%30.7×-7.2%+0.3%
LOTTE CHEMICAL 011170.KSSouth Korea$1.45B-59%+5%-2%n/an/an/a
Elementis ELM.LUnited Kingdom$1.45B+34%-12%20%16.9×16.9%-4.8%
Jilin OLED Material Tech 688378.SSChina$1.45B-17%+74%18%28.1×46.2%+15.2%
Guangdong Orient Zirconic Industry Science & Technology 002167.SZChina$1.44B+5%+17%14%48.5×32.4%+10.1%
Proto Labs PRLBUnited States$1.57B-5%+12%8%27.4×26.8%+4.2%
Genesis Energy, L.P GELUnited States$1.57B-21%-17%19%n/a2.2%-2.2%
Anhui Guangxin Agrochemical 603599.SSChina$1.43B-29%-13%18%13.1×-3.8%+0.6%
Guangdong Dowstone Technology 300409.SZChina$1.59B-50%+34%6%14.0×n/an/a
Shenzhen Rongda Photosensitive & Technology 300576.SZChina$1.40B-31%+14%10%n/an/an/a
Shandong Dawn Polymer 002838.SZChina$1.40B-35%+31%6%19.3×n/an/a
Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech 002741.SZChina$1.40B-9%+61%4%58.4×n/an/a
Tokuyama 4043.TJapan$1.63B-11%+7%9%5.8×1.1%+2.9%
Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals CHAMBLFERT.NSIndia$1.63B-15%+6%12%7.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are KumhoPetrochem's main competitors?
Named competitors: LOTTE CHEMICAL (011170.KS), LG Chem (051910.KS), Zeon Corporation (4205.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Denka (4061.T), Befar (601678.SS), Osaka Soda (4046.T), Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry (600063.SS), Stepan (SCL), Shaily Engineering Plastics (SHAILY.NS).
Is KumhoPetrochem expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.3× against a peer median of 19.3×, cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -24 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has KumhoPetrochem stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.9% against -16.0% for the median peer; over one year -20.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.