Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3211.TWO Dynapack International Technology CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Dynapack International Technology Corporation3211.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Electrical Products

Taiwanese maker of lithium-ion battery packs for notebook computers and other electronic devices, competing with Simplo Technology.

≈ A smaller peer to Simplo Technology in notebook battery packsMomentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$1.08B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$27.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.2 pp
WACC 5.3%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
123 days
9 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$230.50
1D-7.8%
1W-22.5%
1M-42.2%
3M-29.1%
6M-36.4%
YTD-31.6%
1Y-29.2%
ATR %8.5%
52w lowhigh53.4% off high

What Dynapack International Technology does

Taiwanese maker of lithium-ion battery packs for notebook computers and other electronic devices, competing with Simplo Technology.

Assembles battery packs from cells bought from cell makers, adds the protection electronics and sells to notebook brands, so earnings turn on cell prices and the brands' order volumes.

In one line: A smaller peer to Simplo Technology in notebook battery packs.

Products and services

  • Notebook battery packs

Customers

  • Notebook PC OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology hardware
  • Battery packs
  • Lithium-ion battery pack assembly

What could go right

  • Notebook shipment volumes

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration
  • Battery cell cost swings

Moat: narrow (customer qualification). Qualified battery-pack supplier to notebook OEMs, though smaller-scale than the market leader.

Headquarters: Taiwan

Named competitors

Dynapack International Technology at a glance

Size Dynapack International Technology (3211.TWO) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $1.08B, the 254th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$230.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.4%, against -26.7% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +21.3%); the operating margin is 10.9% (peer median 4.4%).

Valuation It trades at 15.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.5× (5th cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -7%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.2 points above its cost of capital (5.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 733211.TWO 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Dynapack International Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dynapack International Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$14.5BNT$13.2BNT$13.9BNT$17.2BNT$19.1B
Revenue growth—-5%-19%-10%—
Gross profitNT$2.82BNT$2.08BNT$1.47BNT$1.42BNT$1.61B
EBITDAn/aNT$1.53BNT$1.04BNT$1.01BNT$1.20B
Net incomeNT$1.26BNT$1.38BNT$2.67BNT$788MNT$797M
Free cash flown/aNT$1.31BNT$1.04BNT$2.87BNT$1.05B
Capital expendituren/aNT$295MNT$189MNT$206MNT$199M
Total debtn/aNT$156MNT$1.13BNT$1.69BNT$2.66B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dynapack International Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-50%0%+50%002125300772001283064760301662605222300153600973688182QPOWERVOLTAMPAMSC0028926002610021690022123211.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dynapack International Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%50×100×001283064760301662605222300153600973688182QPOWERVOLTAMP002533606700221265163211.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dynapack International Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%002125064760300153600973VOLTAMP001208AMSC6002613211.TWOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Dynapack International Technology is the large dot.

Dynapack International Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3211.TWO vs 6121.TWO vs 373220.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Dynapack International Technology 3211.TWO$1.08B-36%+19%11%15.1×4.3%
Simplo Technology 6121.TWO$1.90B-6%+3%11%9.6×-20.1%
LG Energy Solution 373220.KS$58.2B-27%+25%1%n/an/a

How Dynapack International Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dynapack International Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3211.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-42.2%-10.1%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-36.4%-26.7%8th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-53.4%-46.7%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.1%+21.3%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.9%4.4%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.1×25.5×5th cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.3%25.7%least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)-7.3%+9.2%2nd lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+11.6 pp+10.2 pp4th most demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.2 pp-2.1 pphighest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Dynapack International Technology 3211.TWOTaiwan$1.08B-36%+19%11%15.1×4.3%-7.3%
Xiangtan Electrochemical Scientific 002125.SZChina$1.08B-25%+1%9%n/a19.4%+9.2%
Windey Energy Technology 300772.SZChina$1.09B-42%+23%-2%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Highpower Technology 001283.SZChina$1.07B0%+18%5%23.8×n/an/a
Tokai Carbon Korea 064760.KSSouth Korea$1.10B-53%+23%28%15.0×8.8%+5.7%
Ongoal Technology 301662.SZChina$1.06B-51%-3%3%43.9×51.7%n/a
Shanghai QiFan Cable 605222.SSChina$1.11B-51%+12%2%16.4×n/an/a
Shanghai Cooltech Power 300153.SZChina$1.11B-27%+84%5%29.0×37.0%+20.3%
Baosheng Science & Technology Innovation 600973.SSChina$1.11B-26%+31%1%60.2×9.1%+6.9%
Jiangsu Cai Qin Technology 688182.SSChina$1.12B-39%+86%9%50.2×n/an/a
Quality Power Electrical Equipments QPOWER.NSIndia$1.12B+7%+90%19%56.3×n/an/a
Voltamp Transformers VOLTAMP.NSIndia$1.04B+1%+18%15%28.6×35.4%+25.5%
Hunan Valin Wire & Cable 001208.SZChina$1.04B-36%+20%2%25.5×32.0%+21.6%
American Superconductor AMSCUnited States$1.13B-58%+26%4%22.1×56.5%+28.0%
Keli Motor 002892.SZChina$1.13B-14%+13%-1%n/an/an/a
Goldcup Electric Apparatus 002533.SZChina$1.14B-21%+23%3%11.0×n/an/a
Zhejiang Yankon 600261.SSChina$1.03B+52%-2%4%n/a10.2%-11.1%
Guangzhou Zhiguang Electric 002169.SZChina$1.02B-34%+28%1%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material 6067.HKHong Kong$1.02Bn/a+53%10%10.2×n/an/a
Topsec Technologies 002212.SZChina$1.01B-18%-9%-14%99.8×n/an/a
Sanyo Denki 6516.TJapan$1.01B-39%+20%12%11.4×9.0%+6.7%

Questions

Who are Dynapack International Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Simplo Technology (6121.TWO), LG Energy Solution (373220.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Xiangtan Electrochemical Scientific (002125.SZ), Windey Energy Technology (300772.SZ), Shenzhen Highpower Technology (001283.SZ), Tokai Carbon Korea (064760.KS), Ongoal Technology (301662.SZ), Shanghai QiFan Cable (605222.SS).
Is Dynapack International Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.1× against a peer median of 25.5×, 5th cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -7%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Dynapack International Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.4% against -26.7% for the median peer; over one year -29.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.