Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › QPOWER.NS Quality Power Electrical Equipments Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Quality Power Electrical Equipments Ltd.QPOWER.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Capital Goods›Electrical Products

Indian maker of high-voltage grid equipment — instrument transformers, resistors, reactors — with European subsidiaries.

Momentum strong 72
Mkt cap
$1.12B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
25%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.40M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
56.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.4 pp
WACC 17.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · INR₹1,364
1D-6.0%
1W-2.3%
1M-15.6%
3M+17.9%
6M+6.6%
YTD+86.6%
1Y+37.4%
ATR %6.1%
Beta1.02
52w lowhigh18.9% off high

What Quality Power Electrical Equipments does

Indian maker of high-voltage grid equipment — instrument transformers, resistors, reactors — with European subsidiaries.

Products and services

  • Instrument transformers
  • Resistors/reactors
  • Bushings/grid connection equipment

Customers

  • Power utilities/grid operators
  • Renewable energy project developers (HVDC/grid con

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electrical equipment
  • High-voltage grid component…
  • Instrument transformers, resistors…

What could go right

  • Global grid modernization/renewable interconnection demand
  • European subsidiary export growth

What could go wrong

  • Utility/grid tender pricing competition
  • Customer concentration in large grid projects

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Niche high-voltage component expertise and European subsidiary reach, but ABB/Siemens/Hitachi Energy dominate the broader market.

Headquarters: Bengaluru, India · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 249

Named competitors

Quality Power Electrical Equipments at a glance

Size Quality Power Electrical Equipments (QPOWER.NS) is an India Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $1.12B, the 564th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹1,364 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.6%, against -34.1% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 89.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.8%); the operating margin is 18.5% (peer median 4.5%).

Valuation It trades at 56.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.8× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points below its cost of capital (17.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026QPOWER.NS 108Peer median 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Quality Power Electrical Equipments against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Quality Power Electrical Equipments financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹10.7B₹9.46B₹3.36B₹3.01B₹2.53B
Revenue growth—+181%+12%+19%—
Gross profit₹3.23B₹2.65B₹901M₹701M₹684M
EBITDA₹2.13B₹2.18B₹636M₹407M₹484M
Net income₹1.51B₹1.21B₹662M₹374M₹206M
Free cash flown/a-₹249M₹626M₹220M₹409M
Capital expendituren/a₹1.29B₹255M₹481M₹166M
Total debt₹403M₹402M₹87.4M₹383M₹106M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Quality Power Electrical Equipments competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-50%-25%0%+25%688182600973300153605222AMSC0028920025330647603007723211002125001283000922002654ATLANTAELE485AQPOWER.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Quality Power Electrical Equipments is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%25×50×75×688182600973300153605222AMSC0025333016620009223011553677ATLANTAELEQPOWER.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Quality Power Electrical Equipments is the large dot.

Quality Power Electrical Equipments competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (QPOWER.NS vs ABB.NS vs SIEMENS.NS vs POWERINDIA.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Quality Power Electrical Equipments QPOWER.NS$1.12B+7%+90%19%56.3×n/a
ABB India ABB.NS$15.2B-6%+8%13%85.7×47.3%
Siemens SIEMENS.NS$13.4B-8%-12%9%72.7×n/a
Hitachi Energy India POWERINDIA.NS$13.1B-20%+40%15%79.8×50.3%

How Quality Power Electrical Equipments compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Quality Power Electrical Equipments against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureQPOWER.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.6%-17.1%10th highest of 21
6-month return+6.6%-34.1%highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-18.9%-54.3%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+89.9%+20.8%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin18.5%4.5%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E56.3×23.8×3rd most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.4 pp-2.8 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA50.1×21.1×most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA-0.6×-0.1×2nd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Quality Power Electrical Equipments QPOWER.NSIndia$1.12B+7%+90%19%56.3×n/an/a
Jiangsu Cai Qin Technology 688182.SSChina$1.12B-39%+86%9%50.2×n/an/a
Baosheng Science & Technology Innovation 600973.SSChina$1.11B-26%+31%1%60.2×9.1%+6.9%
Shanghai Cooltech Power 300153.SZChina$1.11B-27%+84%5%29.0×37.0%+20.3%
Shanghai QiFan Cable 605222.SSChina$1.11B-51%+12%2%16.4×n/an/a
American Superconductor AMSCUnited States$1.13B-58%+26%4%22.1×56.5%+28.0%
Keli Motor 002892.SZChina$1.13B-14%+13%-1%n/an/an/a
Goldcup Electric Apparatus 002533.SZChina$1.14B-21%+23%3%11.0×n/an/a
Tokai Carbon Korea 064760.KSSouth Korea$1.10B-53%+23%28%15.0×8.8%+5.7%
Windey Energy Technology 300772.SZChina$1.09B-42%+23%-2%n/an/an/a
Dynapack International Technology 3211.TWOTaiwan$1.08B-36%+19%11%15.1×4.3%-7.3%
Xiangtan Electrochemical Scientific 002125.SZChina$1.08B-25%+1%9%n/a19.4%+9.2%
Shenzhen Highpower Technology 001283.SZChina$1.07B0%+18%5%23.8×n/an/a
Ongoal Technology 301662.SZChina$1.06B-51%-3%3%43.9×51.7%n/a
Harbin Electric Corp. Jiamusi Electric Machine 000922.SZChina$1.18B-22%+3%7%25.2×11.1%+15.8%
Shenzhen Mason Technologies 002654.SZChina$1.18B-34%-6%1%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Haili Wind Power Equipment Technology 301155.SZChina$1.18B-31%-69%-17%78.0×n/an/a
PFISTERER PFS0.DEGermany$1.18Bn/a+17%14%16.6×15.5%n/a
Jiangsu Zenergy Battery Technologies 3677.HKHong Kong$1.19B-56%+58%6%8.1×n/an/a
Atlanta Electricals ATLANTAELE.NSIndia$1.19B-10%+59%16%38.9×20.6%+28.4%
PowerX 485A.TJapan$1.20B-55%+213%-1%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Quality Power Electrical Equipments's main competitors?
Named competitors: ABB India (ABB.NS), Siemens India (SIEMENS.NS), Hitachi Energy India (POWERINDIA.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiangsu Cai Qin Technology (688182.SS), Baosheng Science & Technology Innovation (600973.SS), Shanghai Cooltech Power (300153.SZ), Shanghai QiFan Cable (605222.SS), American Superconductor (AMSC), Keli Motor (002892.SZ).
Is Quality Power Electrical Equipments expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 56.3× against a peer median of 23.8×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Quality Power Electrical Equipments stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.6% against -34.1% for the median peer; over one year +37.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.