Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 301365.SZ Matrix Design Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Matrix Design Co., Ltd. Class A301365.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$660M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$9.71M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.6 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
+26 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥24.12
1D-2.1%
1W-2.8%
1M-28.1%
3M-29.1%
6M-31.4%
YTD+1.2%
1Y-5.2%
ATR %7.1%
52w lowhigh45.5% off high

What Matrix Design does

Employees: 693

Matrix Design at a glance

Size Matrix Design (301365.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $660M, the 3212th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥24.12 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 31.4%, against -7.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +15.0%); the operating margin is 3.7% (peer median 8.5%).

Valuation It trades at 4.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.3× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 29% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +26 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points below its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93301365.SZ 67
Six months, rebased to 100: Matrix Design against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Matrix Design financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥709MCN¥730MCN¥527MCN¥526MCN¥792M
Revenue growth—+39%0%-34%—
Gross profitCN¥241MCN¥247MCN¥177MCN¥207MCN¥328M
EBITDAn/aCN¥69.5MCN¥18.8MCN¥20.9MCN¥200M
Net incomeCN¥49.0MCN¥62.9MCN¥33.7MCN¥34.0MCN¥165M
Free cash flowCN¥172MCN¥179MCN¥89.7MCN¥128MCN¥34.7M
Capital expenditureCN¥29.2MCN¥67.0MCN¥67.3MCN¥31.0MCN¥17.7M
Total debtCN¥24.3MCN¥50.0MCN¥43.3MCN¥50.0MCN¥11.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Matrix Design competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%IBEX301528688079300149INTRUMRWS30079708396183603778FRAMERY68848060272291CGY3013982192301468603007JSG301365.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Matrix Design is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%2.5×5×7.5×IBEX301528688079300149INTRUMRWS30079708396183603778FRAMERY68848060272291CGY3013982192301468603007JSG301365.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Matrix Design is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%IBEX301528300149INTRUMRWS3007976183FRAMERY68848060272291CGY2192JSG301365.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Matrix Design is the large dot.

Matrix Design competitors and peer comparison

How Matrix Design compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Matrix Design against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure301365.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-28.1%-4.2%lowest of 21
6-month return-31.4%-7.5%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.5%-39.2%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.9%+15.0%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.7%8.5%6th lowest of 21
EV / Sales4.5×3.3×9th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)29.3%9.9%2nd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.6%+13.8%4th lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+25.7 pp-6.8 pp3rd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.6 pp-1.8 pp10th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Matrix Design 301365.SZChina$660M-31%+9%4%4.5×29.3%+3.6%
IBEX IBEXUnited States$661M+53%+15%9%1.1×0.3%+7.7%
Guangzhou Doppler Electronic Technologies 301528.SZChina$663M-5%+35%22%12.7×42.2%+11.8%
Hangzhou MDK Opto Electronic 688079.SSChina$666M-28%+30%-26%8.4×n/an/a
ChemPartner PharmaTech 300149.SZChina$645M-14%+18%2%3.5×25.6%-5.2%
Intrum INTRUM.STSweden$645M-53%-4%28%2.6×-8.9%+0.2%
RWS RWS.LUnited Kingdom$677M+46%-1%4%0.8×11.5%+14.2%
NCS Testing Technology 300797.SZChina$678M-26%+15%7%3.4×22.3%+15.0%
China Education 0839.HKHong Kong$680M-4%+9%32%1.7×n/an/a
BELLSYSTEM24 6183.TJapan$637M-10%+1%8%1.0×-5.7%+1.4%
Grand Sunergy Tech 603778.SSChina$686M-73%-54%-98%7.8×n/an/a
Framery FRAMERY.HEFinland$632M0%+37%20%2.8×5.9%+13.4%
Science Environmental Protection 688480.SSChina$694M-51%+37%10%3.3×28.2%+28.2%
Bengo4.com 6027.TJapan$695M+94%+19%14%6.4×18.7%+25.1%
LEPU ScienTech Medical Technology (Shanghai) 2291.HKHong Kong$624M+25%-4%42%6.0×-8.4%+28.0%
Calian CGY.TOCanada$699M+22%+16%6%1.3×13.4%+12.4%
Ningbo Sinyuan ZM Technology 301398.SZChina$700M-5%+42%-18%8.9×n/an/a
Medlive Technology 2192.HKHong Kong$621M-25%+6%29%2.6×-0.3%+23.8%
Pourin Special Welding Technology 301468.SZChina$621M-40%-4%5%7.2×n/an/a
Danyang Syngen Intelligent Technology 603007.SSChina$702M-25%+929%-34%6.7×n/an/a
Johnson Service JSG.LUnited Kingdom$704M+10%+2%11%1.3×8.3%+18.4%

Questions

Which companies are Matrix Design's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: IBEX (IBEX), Guangzhou Doppler Electronic Technologies (301528.SZ), Hangzhou MDK Opto Electronic (688079.SS), ChemPartner PharmaTech (300149.SZ), Intrum (INTRUM.ST), RWS (RWS.L), NCS Testing Technology (300797.SZ), China Education (0839.HK).
Is Matrix Design expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.5× against a peer median of 3.3×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 29% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +26 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Matrix Design stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -31.4% against -7.5% for the median peer; over one year -5.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.