Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300542.SZ Brilliance Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Brilliance Technology Co. Ltd. Class A300542.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services
Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$491M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.45M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-7.4 pp
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥11.10
1D-2.4%
1W+8.2%
1M-6.9%
3M-8.0%
6M-27.3%
YTD-45.8%
1Y-41.4%
ATR %5.0%
52w lowhigh48.9% off high

What Brilliance Technology does

Employees: 1,791

Brilliance Technology at a glance

Size Brilliance Technology (300542.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $491M, the 3902nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.3%, against -24.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 22.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.7%); the operating margin is 1.5% (peer median 4.3%).

Valuation It trades at 3.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.1× (8th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.4 points below its cost of capital (9.0% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 75300542.SZ 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Brilliance Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Brilliance Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.08BCN¥1.07BCN¥1.35BCN¥1.73BCN¥1.45B
Revenue growth—-20%-22%+19%—
Gross profitCN¥180MCN¥186MCN¥196MCN¥296MCN¥275M
EBITDACN¥23.1MCN¥25.4MCN¥1.78MCN¥76.2MCN¥77.2M
Net income-CN¥9.95M-CN¥13.3M-CN¥81.5MCN¥36.4MCN¥52.1M
Free cash flow-CN¥229M-CN¥268MCN¥103MCN¥192M-CN¥29.1M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.67MCN¥1.70MCN¥2.12MCN¥5.69MCN¥1.65M
Total debtCN¥635MCN¥369MCN¥271MCN¥387MCN¥255M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Brilliance Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%300448MASTEKRMNI300231300366301178HSN4674NTGR544MTC00247448280023319247YB003005300962605398688590300542.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Brilliance Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×5×10×300448MASTEKRMNI300231300366301178NTGR5440024744828003005300962605398300542.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Brilliance Technology is the large dot.

Brilliance Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Brilliance Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Brilliance Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300542.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.9%-6.3%11th highest of 21
6-month return-27.3%-24.5%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-48.9%-40.9%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-22.1%+4.7%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin1.5%4.3%9th lowest of 19
EV / Sales3.2×2.1×8th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.4 pp-6.2 pp9th lowest of 18
Net debt / EBITDA8.7×-0.7×most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Brilliance Technology 300542.SZChina$491M-27%-22%2%3.2×n/an/a
Haoyun Technologies 300448.SZChina$490M-40%-52%n/a13.1×1.8%-12.8%
Mastek MASTEK.NSIndia$485M-12%+6%13%1.0×6.7%+16.5%
Rimini Street RMNIUnited States$484M+30%+3%7%1.0×11.0%+5.2%
Beijing Trustfar Technology 300231.SZChina$481M-28%+4%3%1.8×21.0%-4.3%
Troy Information Technology 300366.SZChina$474M-19%-56%-80%5.6×n/an/a
Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry 301178.SZChina$472M-13%+100%1%5.4×37.4%+5.5%
Hansen Technologies HSN.AXAustralia$511M-25%-2%17%2.0×0.9%+4.7%
CRESCO 4674.TJapan$471M+36%+10%10%0.9×-1.6%+10.2%
NETGEAR NTGRUnited States$513M-31%-1%-4%0.4×n/an/a
CSE Global 544.SISingapore$467M-45%+25%5%0.8×n/an/a
MMTec MTCUnited States$516M-31%+100%n/an/an/an/a
Fujian Rongji Software 002474.SZChina$520M-24%-22%-21%10.3×31.5%-8.1%
Business Engineering 4828.TJapan$463M+1%+16%26%2.4×-6.5%+6.7%
Anhui Wantong Technology 002331.SZChina$520M-25%+23%-16%2.2×n/an/a
Tre 9247.TJapan$521M0%-9%14%1.0×-12.8%+23.2%
Yuanbao, Inc. Unsponsored ADR YBUnited States$523M-34%+37%32%n/an/an/a
Beijing Jingyeda Technology 003005.SZChina$458M-26%+26%-21%4.8×n/an/a
Zhongjin Irradiation 300962.SZChina$526M-18%+1%27%9.2×n/an/a
Shanghai New Centurion Network Information Technology 605398.SSChina$530M-18%+5%-2%5.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Newtouch Software 688590.SSChina$454M-28%+5%-7%1.8×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Brilliance Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Haoyun Technologies (300448.SZ), Mastek (MASTEK.NS), Rimini Street (RMNI), Beijing Trustfar Technology (300231.SZ), Troy Information Technology (300366.SZ), Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry (301178.SZ), Hansen Technologies (HSN.AX), CRESCO (4674.T).
Is Brilliance Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.2× against a peer median of 2.1×, 8th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Brilliance Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.3% against -24.5% for the median peer; over one year -41.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.