Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300366.SZ Troy Information Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Troy Information Technology Co., Ltd. Class A300366.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services
Momentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$474M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
83%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.85M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-44.3 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥4.52
1D-0.9%
1W+2.3%
1M-16.4%
3M-1.9%
6M-19.4%
YTD-33.6%
1Y-33.2%
ATR %4.3%
52w lowhigh44.9% off high

What Troy Information Technology does

Employees: 1,163

Troy Information Technology at a glance

Size Troy Information Technology (300366.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $474M, the 3984th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.4%, against -25.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 56.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.5%); the operating margin is -80.2% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 5.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.8× (3rd most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 44.3 points below its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300366.SZ 80Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Troy Information Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Troy Information Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥585MCN¥744MCN¥1.40BCN¥1.67BCN¥2.01B
Revenue growth—-47%-16%-17%—
Gross profitCN¥7.47MCN¥2.63MCN¥8.90MCN¥164MCN¥270M
EBITDA-CN¥404M-CN¥382M-CN¥307M-CN¥485MCN¥3.49M
Net income-CN¥641M-CN¥633M-CN¥78.9M-CN¥474M-CN¥56.8M
Free cash flow-CN¥90.3M-CN¥98.9MCN¥88.1M-CN¥139M-CN¥736M
Capital expenditureCN¥20.7MCN¥24.3MCN¥73.9MCN¥167MCN¥213M
Total debtCN¥377MCN¥415MCN¥479MCN¥846MCN¥793M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Troy Information Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%3011784674544300231RMNI4828MASTEK003005300448300542688590ALCHSNNTGRMTC0024740023319247YBCMP300366.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Troy Information Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×5×10×3011784674544300231RMNI4828003005300448300542NTGR0024749247300366.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Troy Information Technology is the large dot.

Troy Information Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Troy Information Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Troy Information Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300366.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.4%-6.3%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-19.4%-25.0%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-44.9%-39.4%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-56.2%+6.5%lowest of 21
Operating margin-80.2%6.3%lowest of 19
EV / Sales5.6×1.8×3rd most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-44.3 pp-5.1 pplowest of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Troy Information Technology 300366.SZChina$474M-19%-56%-80%5.6×n/an/a
Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry 301178.SZChina$472M-13%+100%1%5.4×37.4%+5.5%
CRESCO 4674.TJapan$471M+36%+10%10%0.9×-1.6%+10.2%
CSE Global 544.SISingapore$467M-45%+25%5%0.8×n/an/a
Beijing Trustfar Technology 300231.SZChina$481M-28%+4%3%1.8×21.0%-4.3%
Rimini Street RMNIUnited States$484M+30%+3%7%1.0×11.0%+5.2%
Business Engineering 4828.TJapan$463M+1%+16%26%2.4×-6.5%+6.7%
Mastek MASTEK.NSIndia$485M-12%+6%13%1.0×6.7%+16.5%
Beijing Jingyeda Technology 003005.SZChina$458M-26%+26%-21%4.8×n/an/a
Haoyun Technologies 300448.SZChina$490M-40%-52%n/a13.1×1.8%-12.8%
Brilliance Technology 300542.SZChina$491M-27%-22%2%3.2×n/an/a
Shanghai Newtouch Software 688590.SSChina$454M-28%+5%-7%1.8×n/an/a
Altia Consultores ALC.MCSpain$444M-17%+23%8%n/an/an/a
Hansen Technologies HSN.AXAustralia$511M-25%-2%17%2.0×0.9%+4.7%
NETGEAR NTGRUnited States$513M-31%-1%-4%0.4×n/an/a
MMTec MTCUnited States$516M-31%+100%n/an/an/an/a
Fujian Rongji Software 002474.SZChina$520M-24%-22%-21%10.3×31.5%-8.1%
Anhui Wantong Technology 002331.SZChina$520M-25%+23%-16%2.2×n/an/a
Tre 9247.TJapan$521M0%-9%14%1.0×-12.8%+23.2%
Yuanbao, Inc. Unsponsored ADR YBUnited States$523M-34%+37%32%n/an/an/a
Comp CMP.WAPoland$427M+64%+7%11%1.8×6.0%+3.3%

Questions

Which companies are Troy Information Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry (301178.SZ), CRESCO (4674.T), CSE Global (544.SI), Beijing Trustfar Technology (300231.SZ), Rimini Street (RMNI), Business Engineering (4828.T), Mastek (MASTEK.NS), Beijing Jingyeda Technology (003005.SZ).
Is Troy Information Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.6× against a peer median of 1.8×, 3rd most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Troy Information Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.4% against -25.0% for the median peer; over one year -33.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.