Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 003005.SZ Beijing Jingyeda Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing Jingyeda Technology Co. Ltd. Class A003005.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services
Momentum neutral 48
Mkt cap
$458M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-10.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥13.20
1D-3.8%
1W+7.8%
1M-10.7%
3M-2.1%
6M-26.4%
YTD-35.3%
1Y-42.7%
ATR %6.2%
52w lowhigh43.6% off high

What Beijing Jingyeda Technology does

Employees: 1,086

Beijing Jingyeda Technology at a glance

Size Beijing Jingyeda Technology (003005.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $458M, the 4073rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥13.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.4%, against -18.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 26.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.5%); the operating margin is -20.7% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 4.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.8× (5th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.7 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81003005.SZ 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing Jingyeda Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing Jingyeda Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥468MCN¥477MCN¥480MCN¥407MCN¥436M
Revenue growth—-1%+18%-7%—
Gross profitCN¥213MCN¥180MCN¥194MCN¥172MCN¥192M
EBITDAn/aCN¥24.1MCN¥59.2MCN¥8.05MCN¥29.7M
Net income-CN¥94.8MCN¥8.58MCN¥42.7MCN¥10.1MCN¥50.2M
Free cash flow-CN¥157M-CN¥3.62M-CN¥10.2M-CN¥1.38M-CN¥32.3M
Capital expenditureCN¥33.5MCN¥27.8MCN¥46.3MCN¥76.1MCN¥83.4M
Total debtCN¥40.9MCN¥69.2MCN¥73.3MCN¥56.4MCN¥52.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing Jingyeda Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%68859048285444674301178ALC300366300231RMNIMASTEK300448300542CMP443196923661HSNNTGRMTC003005.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing Jingyeda Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×5×10×6885904828544467430117830036630023130044830054244313661688292003005.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing Jingyeda Technology is the large dot.

Beijing Jingyeda Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Beijing Jingyeda Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing Jingyeda Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure003005.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.7%-6.3%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-26.4%-18.4%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.6%-37.8%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+26.0%+6.5%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin-20.7%7.6%2nd lowest of 19
EV / Sales4.8×1.8×5th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-10.7 pp-2.5 pp4th lowest of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing Jingyeda Technology 003005.SZChina$458M-26%+26%-21%4.8×n/an/a
Shanghai Newtouch Software 688590.SSChina$454M-28%+5%-7%1.8×n/an/a
Business Engineering 4828.TJapan$463M+1%+16%26%2.4×-6.5%+6.7%
CSE Global 544.SISingapore$467M-45%+25%5%0.8×n/an/a
CRESCO 4674.TJapan$471M+36%+10%10%0.9×-1.6%+10.2%
Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry 301178.SZChina$472M-13%+100%1%5.4×37.4%+5.5%
Altia Consultores ALC.MCSpain$444M-17%+23%8%n/an/an/a
Troy Information Technology 300366.SZChina$474M-19%-56%-80%5.6×n/an/a
Beijing Trustfar Technology 300231.SZChina$481M-28%+4%3%1.8×21.0%-4.3%
Rimini Street RMNIUnited States$484M+30%+3%7%1.0×11.0%+5.2%
Mastek MASTEK.NSIndia$485M-12%+6%13%1.0×6.7%+16.5%
Haoyun Technologies 300448.SZChina$490M-40%-52%n/a13.1×1.8%-12.8%
Brilliance Technology 300542.SZChina$491M-27%-22%2%3.2×n/an/a
Comp CMP.WAPoland$427M+64%+7%11%1.8×6.0%+3.3%
Smaregi 4431.TJapan$421M+42%+21%26%4.2×-3.2%+32.0%
Computer Engineering & Consulting 9692.TJapan$420M+5%+18%11%0.6×-18.5%+6.5%
m-up 3661.TJapan$413M+24%+22%16%1.6×-7.5%+20.8%
Hansen Technologies HSN.AXAustralia$511M-25%-2%17%2.0×0.9%+4.7%
NETGEAR NTGRUnited States$513M-31%-1%-4%0.4×n/an/a
Beijing Haohan Data Technology 688292.SSChina$408M-23%+6%-12%6.0×n/an/a
MMTec MTCUnited States$516M-31%+100%n/an/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Beijing Jingyeda Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shanghai Newtouch Software (688590.SS), Business Engineering (4828.T), CSE Global (544.SI), CRESCO (4674.T), Guangdong TianYiMa Information Industry (301178.SZ), Altia Consultores (ALC.MC), Troy Information Technology (300366.SZ), Beijing Trustfar Technology (300231.SZ).
Is Beijing Jingyeda Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.8× against a peer median of 1.8×, 5th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Beijing Jingyeda Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.4% against -18.4% for the median peer; over one year -42.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.