Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2156.HK C&D Property Management Group Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

C&D Property Management Group Co., Ltd.2156.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Real Estate›Real Estate Development
Momentum neutral 59
Mkt cap
$445M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
38%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$204,144
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 7.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
133 days
19 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$2.48
1D-0.6%
1W+0.4%
1M-4.4%
3M-3.5%
6M-14.2%
YTD-8.2%
1Y-16.8%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh21.3% off high

What C&D Property Management does

Employees: 17,506

C&D Property Management at a glance

Size C&D Property Management (2156.HK) is a Hong Kong Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $445M, the 788th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$2.48 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.2%, against -14.9% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.6%); the operating margin is 10.8% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 7.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.5× (cheapest of 8).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 872156.HK 85
Six months, rebased to 100: C&D Property Management against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

C&D Property Management financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$4.72BHK$4.21BHK$3.57BHK$3.95BHK$2.67B
Revenue growth—+18%-10%+48%—
Gross profitHK$983MHK$863MHK$746MHK$1.09BHK$611M
EBITDAn/aHK$483MHK$393MHK$738MHK$304M
Net incomeHK$430MHK$389MHK$351MHK$516MHK$287M
Free cash flown/aHK$720MHK$360MHK$239MHK$640M
Capital expendituren/aHK$20.3MHK$19.1MHK$33.5MHK$19.9M
Total debtn/aHK$175MHK$146MHK$194MHK$107M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

C&D Property Management competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%EASTMTVW2270000736600638000421CORE-ATRCTCI600622KOLTEPATIL000609SBB-BREAXSUNTECK000897RUSTOMJEEORIA471A2156.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. C&D Property Management is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%50×100×EASTCORE-ATRCKOLTEPATILSUNTECKRUSTOMJEE471A2156.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. C&D Property Management is the large dot.

C&D Property Management competitors and peer comparison

How C&D Property Management compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

C&D Property Management against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2156.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.4%-1.7%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-14.2%-14.9%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.3%-30.8%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.0%+2.6%6th highest of 21
Operating margin10.8%6.5%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E7.5×15.5×cheapest of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
C&D Property Management 2156.HKHong Kong$445M-14%+24%11%7.5×n/an/a
Eastnine EAST.STSweden$443M+1%+2%83%11.8×n/an/a
Mountview Estates P.L.C MTVW.LUnited Kingdom$448M-3%0%44%n/an/an/a
Desun Real Estate Investment Services 2270.HKHong Kong$450M+47%+10%5%n/an/an/a
CCCG Urban Development 000736.SZChina$452M-26%-92%4%n/an/an/a
Shanghai New Huang Pu Industrial 600638.SSChina$452M-28%+3%5%n/an/an/a
Nanjing Public Utilities Development 000421.SZChina$437M-20%-40%1%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Phoenix Property Investment 600716.SSChina$455M-27%-50%-129%n/an/an/a
Corem Property CORE-A.STSweden$458M-12%-10%59%11.6×n/an/a
Tejon Ranch TRCUnited States$460M-15%+25%-1%94.7×n/an/a
Transcontinental Realty Investors TCIUnited States$430M+40%+5%-18%n/an/an/a
Everbright Jiabao 600622.SSChina$461M-23%-26%-32%n/an/an/a
Kolte-Patil Developers KOLTEPATIL.NSIndia$430M+19%+8%9%21.1×n/an/a
Beijing Zodi Investment 000609.SZChina$429M-34%+123%-62%n/an/an/a
Samhallsbyggnadsbolaget I Norden SBB-B.STSweden$429M-31%-30%45%n/an/an/a
Real Brokerage REAXUnited States$463M-4%+38%0%n/an/an/a
Sunteck Realty SUNTECK.NSIndia$463M-14%+45%29%15.8×n/an/a
Tianjin Jinbin Development 000897.SZChina$463M-12%-28%13%n/an/an/a
Keystone Realtors RUSTOMJEE.NSIndia$463M-19%+55%8%15.5×n/an/a
Fiducial Real Estate ORIA.PAFrance$428M-4%-5%41%n/an/an/a
NS Group,Inc 471A.TJapan$465M-17%+13%34%9.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are C&D Property Management's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Eastnine (EAST.ST), Mountview Estates P.L.C (MTVW.L), Desun Real Estate Investment Services (2270.HK), CCCG Urban Development (000736.SZ), Shanghai New Huang Pu Industrial (600638.SS), Nanjing Public Utilities Development (000421.SZ), Jiangsu Phoenix Property Investment (600716.SS), Corem Property (CORE-A.ST).
Is C&D Property Management expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.5× against a peer median of 15.5×, cheapest of 8 in its peer set.
How has C&D Property Management stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.2% against -14.9% for the median peer; over one year -16.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.