Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 200470.KS APACT Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

APACT Co., Ltd.200470.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum leader 89
Mkt cap
$245M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
46%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$11.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-5.7 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩7,450
1D-8.6%
1W-22.1%
1M-25.4%
3M+44.9%
6M-13.9%
YTD+9.7%
1Y+46.1%
ATR %12.8%
52w lowhigh43.1% off high

What APACT does

Employees: 440

APACT at a glance

Size APACT (200470.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $245M, the 495th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩7,450 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 13.9%, against -9.6% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 44.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.7%); the operating margin is 4.3% (peer median 5.2%).

Valuation It trades at 3.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.1× (8th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.7 points below its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 89200470.KS 84
Six months, rebased to 100: APACT against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

APACT financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩137B₩111B₩86.7B₩93.7B₩73.6B
Revenue growth—+28%-7%+27%—
Gross profit₩12.9B₩11.1B-₩15.1B-₩15.1B₩8.92B
EBITDA₩14.7B₩15.2B₩393M-₩837M₩19.0B
Net income₩10.4B₩5.23B-₩50.7B-₩16.7B₩3.09B
Free cash flow-₩28.2B-₩3.85B-₩11.6B-₩19.1B-₩934M
Capital expenditure₩33.6B₩9.82B₩12.2B₩18.8B₩7.91B
Total debt₩129B₩95.6B₩92.6B₩98.3B₩76.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

APACT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%BBW328946580331SAG60883013202179300536002431JAYKAY605069KNOW0028619658HCKTKEYS200470.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. APACT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×5×10×BBW328946580331SAG60884051REJL-B2179300536002431JAYKAY605069301633200470.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. APACT is the large dot.

APACT competitors and peer comparison

How APACT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

APACT against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure200470.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-25.4%-6.2%lowest of 21
6-month return-13.9%-9.6%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.1%-35.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+44.0%+3.7%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin4.3%5.2%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales3.1×2.1×8th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.7 pp-3.4 pp9th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA28.6×9.4×most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA5.9×-0.3×most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
APACT 200470.KSSouth Korea$245M-14%+44%4%3.1×n/an/a
Azeus Systems BBW.SISingapore$226M-17%-6%32%3.2×-7.7%+19.7%
Integrated Service Technology 3289.TWOTaiwan$267M-45%+5%2%2.2×32.8%+9.7%
Nippon Air Conditioning Services 4658.TJapan$301M-12%+7%7%0.6×-1.6%+7.1%
FSE Lifestyle Services 0331.HKHong Kong$305M-4%-3%6%0.3×n/an/a
Science SAG.LUnited Kingdom$308M-4%-11%17%1.7×-5.8%+8.7%
SIGMAXYZ 6088.TJapan$310M-6%-13%24%2.0×-9.5%+11.2%
GMO Financial Gate 4051.TJapan$310M+3%+14%12%2.3×17.0%+37.2%
Rejlers REJL-B.STSweden$314M-7%+6%6%0.9×-3.1%+14.9%
Qingdao Richmat Intelligence Technology 301320.SZChina$315M-34%+20%-3%1.9×n/an/a
Jiangsu Recbio Technology 2179.HKHong Kong$317M-43%-82%-25,868%1,485.2×n/an/a
Wuhan Nusun Landscape 300536.SZChina$319M-29%+154%-57%4.8×n/an/a
Palm Eco-Town Development 002431.SZChina$319M-43%-52%-50%5.6×14.2%-16.0%
Jaykay Enterprises JAYKAY.NSIndia$321M+28%+118%4%11.7×n/an/a
Beijing ZEHO Waterfront Ecological Environment Treatment 605069.SSChina$324M-28%+3%-62%10.1×n/an/a
Knowit KNOW.STSweden$327M+48%-6%2%0.7×6.3%+12.1%
YingTong Telecommunication 002861.SZChina$329M-27%+15%-8%2.3×n/an/a
Wuhan Guide Technology 301633.SZChina$331M-19%-32%-11%5.3×n/an/a
Business Brain Showaota 9658.TJapan$332M+63%+6%7%1.1×-1.2%+7.6%
Hackett HCKTUnited States$334M+25%-8%13%1.4×-1.2%+5.0%
Keystone Law KEYS.LUnited Kingdom$335M+38%+21%9%1.9×7.3%+15.9%

Questions

Which companies are APACT's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Azeus Systems (BBW.SI), Integrated Service Technology (3289.TWO), Nippon Air Conditioning Services (4658.T), FSE Lifestyle Services (0331.HK), Science (SAG.L), SIGMAXYZ (6088.T), GMO Financial Gate (4051.T), Rejlers (REJL-B.ST).
Is APACT expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.1× against a peer median of 2.1×, 8th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has APACT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -13.9% against -9.6% for the median peer; over one year +46.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.