Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 140860.KS Park Systems Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Park Systems Corp.140860.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Equipment/Instruments

Korean maker of atomic force microscopes used for nanoscale surface measurement in semiconductor and materials research.

≈ Korea's answer to Bruker/Asylum Research in AFMMomentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$965M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.38M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.1 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩188,300
1D-12.4%
1W-14.2%
1M-38.9%
3M-25.3%
6M-34.8%
YTD-9.9%
1Y-21.7%
ATR %8.4%
52w lowhigh46.3% off high

What Park Systems does

Korean maker of atomic force microscopes used for nanoscale surface measurement in semiconductor and materials research.

Sells instruments one at a time at high unit prices, with most sales outside Korea and a growing share to chip fabs that use the instrument in production lines, not just in labs. Founder Sang-il Park, a former Stanford researcher, remains the controlling shareholder.

In one line: Korea's answer to Bruker/Asylum Research in AFM.

Products and services

  • AFM systems
  • Semiconductor metrology AFM
  • Life-science/materials AFM

Customers

  • Semiconductor fabs
  • University and national labs
  • Materials research institutes

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Scientific instruments
  • Atomic force microscopy
  • Semiconductor/materials metrology

What could go right

  • Semiconductor advanced-node metrology demand
  • Expansion into industrial fabs

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • Competition from larger instrument makers

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Patented true non-contact AFM technology gives higher measurement accuracy than rivals.

Headquarters: Suwon, South Korea · Founded: 1997 · Employees: 392

Named competitors

Park Systems at a glance

Size Park Systems (140860.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Equipment/Instruments) with a market value of $965M, the 238th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩188,300 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 34.8%, against -17.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 6.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.7%); the operating margin is 12.0% (peer median 4.8%).

Valuation It trades at 30.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.1× (4th most expensive of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points below its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81140860.KS 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Park Systems against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Park Systems financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩195B₩206B₩175B₩145B₩125B
Revenue growth—+17%+21%+16%—
Gross profit₩122B₩129B₩109B₩88.7B₩78.4B
EBITDA₩33.1B₩50.0B₩44.9B₩32.2B₩36.4B
Net income₩23.2B₩34.5B₩42.8B₩24.6B₩28.0B
Free cash flow-₩72.3B-₩29.3B₩6.54B₩19.1B₩23.7B
Capital expenditure₩77.9B₩54.3B₩28.6B₩12.7B₩3.89B
Total debt₩91.0B₩82.6B₩42.1B₩27.4B₩15.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Park Systems competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%+20%300416TRNS6034163012827734301629300420658824983003863019300080688628688550301525002121002730EVLV140860.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Park Systems is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%50×100×150×300416TRNS603416053777343016296588688628688550301525002121140860.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Park Systems is the large dot.

Park Systems competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (140860.KS vs BRKR vs OXIG.L vs 6501.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Park Systems 140860.KS$965M-35%-6%12%30.3×n/a
Bruker BRKR$9.34B+39%+2%9%26.2×25.7%
Oxford Instruments OXIG.L$1.79B-16%-15%15%21.9×20.1%
Hitachi 6501.T$130B-7%+14%12%20.9×9.5%

How Park Systems compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Park Systems against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure140860.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-38.9%-9.3%lowest of 21
6-month return-34.8%-17.5%6th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-46.3%-44.9%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-6.3%+11.7%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin12.0%4.8%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E30.3×22.1×4th most expensive of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.1 pp-5.9 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA38.5×8.3×most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA-1.1×-0.4×2nd least indebted of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Park Systems 140860.KSSouth Korea$965M-35%-6%12%30.3×n/an/a
Suzhou Sushi Testing 300416.SZChina$957M-26%+8%15%23.0×2.6%+13.7%
Transcat TRNSUnited States$955M+33%+20%5%45.0×30.3%+13.9%
Wuxi Xinje Electric 603416.SSChina$984M-22%+26%9%21.1×19.8%+12.2%
Rigol Technologies 0537.HKHong Kong$989Mn/a+33%9%21.2×35.8%+19.6%
Camelot Electronics Technology 301282.SZChina$992M+12%+58%7%n/an/an/a
Riken Keiki 7734.TJapan$930M-7%+11%22%13.8×2.6%+11.4%
Sidea Semiconductor Equipment (Shenzhen) 301629.SZChina$924M-39%-27%0%147.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu Wuyang Automation Control Technology 300420.SZChina$921M+51%-10%5%n/an/an/a
Toshiba Tec 6588.TJapan$918M-2%+7%3%11.3×n/an/a
RoboSense Technology Company 2498.HKHong Kong$914M-55%+32%-22%n/an/an/a
Feitian Technologies 300386.SZChina$909M-17%-20%-20%n/an/an/a
Asia Optical 3019.TWTaiwan$1.04B-14%+13%10%16.2×0.1%+10.9%
Henan Yicheng New Energy 300080.SZChina$1.05B-17%-13%-21%n/an/an/a
Fujian Acetron New Materials 300706.SZChina$873M-11%+19%3%n/an/an/a
Uni-Trend Technology (China) 688628.SSChina$1.07B-34%+33%15%29.1×n/an/a
Xi'an Manareco New Materials 688550.SSChina$850M-19%-2%13%15.6×7.4%+9.8%
Shanghai Ruking Technologies 301525.SZChina$838M-13%-2%1%43.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Clou Electronics 002121.SZChina$1.11B-36%+40%-5%29.5×n/an/a
Dianguang Explosion-proof Technology 002730.SZChina$832M-54%-6%6%n/an/an/a
Evolv Technologies EVLVUnited States$826M-35%+42%-20%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Park Systems's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bruker (BRKR), Oxford Instruments (OXIG.L), Hitachi High-Tech (6501.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Suzhou Sushi Testing (300416.SZ), Transcat (TRNS), Wuxi Xinje Electric (603416.SS), Rigol Technologies (0537.HK), Camelot Electronics Technology (301282.SZ), Riken Keiki (7734.T).
Is Park Systems expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.3× against a peer median of 22.1×, 4th most expensive of 13 in its peer set.
How has Park Systems stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -34.8% against -17.5% for the median peer; over one year -21.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.