Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › OXIG.L Oxford Instruments plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Oxford Instruments plcOXIG.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Information Technology›Electronic Equipment/Instruments

UK maker of scientific instruments for materials analysis, semiconductor processing and life-science imaging, including microscopes and cameras.

≈ A UK niche scientific-instruments makerMomentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$1.79B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.94M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
21.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.6 pp
WACC 12.6%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · GBP£2,436
1D+2.9%
1W-5.4%
1M-16.8%
3M-15.5%
6M-16.5%
YTD+18.8%
1Y+36.4%
ATR %6.4%
52w lowhigh26.9% off high

What Oxford Instruments does

UK maker of scientific instruments for materials analysis, semiconductor processing and life-science imaging, including microscopes and cameras.

Sells instruments to research labs and industry, then earns service contracts and consumables across their long life; academic funding cycles and semiconductor equipment demand decide order timing. It sold its NanoScience quantum-cooling unit to Quantum Design, completed around the start of 2026, and now focuses on materials analysis, semiconductor and life science.

In one line: A UK niche scientific-instruments maker.

Products and services

  • Materials analysis (X-ray, EDS, EBSD, nanoindentation)
  • Plasma etch and deposition tools
  • Microscopy and scientific cameras (Andor, WITec)
  • Benchtop NMR
  • X-ray sources

Customers

  • Semiconductor and materials makers
  • Academic and research labs
  • Life-science and healthcare labs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology/Instruments
  • Scientific instrumentation
  • Materials analysis, plasma process…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor materials research demand
  • Life-science imaging demand

What could go wrong

  • Academic/government research funding cycles
  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base). Specialist analysis and imaging instruments with a sizeable installed base and service income.

Headquarters: Abingdon, UK · Founded: 1959

Named competitors

Oxford Instruments at a glance

Size Oxford Instruments (OXIG.L) is a United Kingdom Information Technology company (Electronic Equipment/Instruments) with a market value of $1.79B, the 172nd largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £2,436 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.5%, against -20.0% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 15.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.0%); the operating margin is 15.1% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 21.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.3× (6th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.6 points above its cost of capital (12.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026OXIG.L 81Peer median 81
Six months, rebased to 100: Oxford Instruments against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Oxford Instruments financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£423M£423M£443M£470M£445M
Revenue growth—-5%-6%+6%—
Gross profit£228M£228M£234M£233M£220M
EBITDA£83.4M£83.4M£92.7M£80.7M£86.8M
Net income£48.2M£48.2M£26.0M£50.7M£58.6M
Free cash flow£47.4M£47.4M£37.1M£18.5M£35.3M
Capital expenditure£10.3M£10.3M£14.6M£27.7M£32.9M
Total debtn/a£44.5M£40.9M£47.4M£43.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Oxford Instruments competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%3000070029473004550021396006516012226754002980688003688390688006DBD6886126035566728645780396886116436002214OXIG.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Oxford Instruments is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%20×40×60×3000070029470021396012226754688003688390688006DBD6886126457688611OXIG.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Oxford Instruments is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%3000070029476754688003688390688006DBD6886126035566728645780396436OXIG.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Oxford Instruments is the large dot.

Oxford Instruments competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (OXIG.L vs BRKR vs TMO vs 6951.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Oxford Instruments OXIG.L$1.79B-16%-15%15%21.9×20.1%
Bruker BRKR$9.34B+39%+2%9%26.2×25.7%
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO$257B+50%+8%19%25.8×20.9%
JEOL 6951.T$1.98B-3%-18%11%14.2×21.3%

How Oxford Instruments compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Oxford Instruments against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOXIG.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.8%-6.6%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-16.5%-20.0%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-26.9%-47.1%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-15.5%+6.0%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin15.1%6.5%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E21.9×16.3×6th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)20.1%14.1%4th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.8%+9.3%5th lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.2 pp-1.5 pp4th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.6 pp-0.8 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA15.2×7.3×2nd most expensive of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-0.8×-1.5×3rd most indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Oxford Instruments OXIG.LUnited Kingdom$1.79B-16%-15%15%21.9×20.1%+5.8%
Hanwei Electronics 300007.SZChina$1.79B-15%-3%2%65.2×40.9%+4.6%
Suzhou Hengmingda Electronic Technology 002947.SZChina$1.78B-43%+13%18%15.6×9.4%+34.8%
Beijing Aerospace Shenzhou Intelligent Equipment Technology 300455.SZChina$1.81B-36%-29%-4%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Topband 002139.SZChina$1.81B-8%+9%3%37.7×n/an/a
Shanghai Feilo Acoustics 600651.SSChina$1.82B-30%-11%-3%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Linyang Energy 601222.SSChina$1.74B-6%+35%8%15.4×n/an/a
Anritsu 6754.TJapan$1.87B-45%+21%15%16.3×11.3%+2.1%
Shenzhen Everbest Machinery Industry 002980.SZChina$1.90B-16%+64%23%n/an/an/a
Suzhou TZTEK Technology 688003.SSChina$1.67B-19%+33%5%64.3×42.0%+13.2%
Goodwe Technologies 688390.SSChina$1.93B-51%+53%5%17.1×17.4%+41.2%
Zhejiang HangKe Technology 688006.SSChina$1.64B-43%+12%3%24.0×16.0%+14.9%
Diebold Nixdorf DBDUnited States$1.96B-25%+6%9%10.5×-2.0%-0.5%
Shenzhen VMAX New Energy (Group) 688612.SSChina$1.63B-21%-6%9%17.5×18.8%+57.4%
Hexing Electrical 603556.SSChina$1.61B-23%+6%9%14.2×0.1%+11.3%
ULVAC 6728.TJapan$2.01B-34%+7%7%15.5×14.1%+8.0%
Glory 6457.TJapan$1.53B+16%-8%9%12.2×-8.1%+9.3%
TAIFLEX Scientific 8039.TWTaiwan$1.51B+36%+3%6%n/a28.3%+3.9%
Hangzhou Kelin Electric 688611.SSChina$1.51B+4%-58%-32%48.1×n/an/a
Amano 6436.TJapan$1.50B-4%+1%11%13.7×-7.6%+9.2%
Zhejiang Dali Technology 002214.SZChina$1.45B-15%+1%-68%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Oxford Instruments's main competitors?
Named competitors: Bruker Corporation (BRKR), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), JEOL Ltd (6951.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hanwei Electronics (300007.SZ), Suzhou Hengmingda Electronic Technology (002947.SZ), Beijing Aerospace Shenzhou Intelligent Equipment Technology (300455.SZ), Shenzhen Topband (002139.SZ), Shanghai Feilo Acoustics (600651.SS), Jiangsu Linyang Energy (601222.SS).
Is Oxford Instruments expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 21.9× against a peer median of 16.3×, 6th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 20% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Oxford Instruments stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.5% against -20.0% for the median peer; over one year +36.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.