Loading…

Bruker CorporationBRKRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Maker of scientific instruments (mass spectrometry, NMR, X-ray) for life-science research, applied and clinical microbiology markets.

Momentum leader 87
Mkt cap
$9.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$149M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
26.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
102 days
16 Feb 2027
Close · USD$61.31
1D+5.6%
1W+7.4%
1M+5.8%
3M+8.9%
6M+38.8%
YTD+30.1%
1Y+52.5%
ATR %6.3%
Beta1.61
52w lowhigh11.1% off high

What Bruker does

Maker of scientific instruments (mass spectrometry, NMR, X-ray) for life-science research, applied and clinical microbiology markets.

Sells high-priced laboratory instruments to universities, government labs, drugmakers and hospitals, then earns repeat income from service contracts, upgrades and consumables on the installed base. Orders depend on research budgets, notably public research funding at universities. It has expanded into spatial biology and diagnostics through acquisitions, including NanoString in 2024.

Products and services

  • BioSpin (NMR/MRI research instruments)
  • CALID (mass spectrometry, clinical microbiology)
  • Nano (X-ray, atomic force microscopy)

Customers

  • Academic/government research labs
  • Pharma/biotech companies
  • Clinical microbiology labs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Healthcare/Life Sciences
  • Scientific instruments
  • Mass spec, NMR, microbiology…

What could go right

  • Proteomics/spatial biology research demand
  • Clinical microbiology testing growth

What could go wrong

  • Academic/government research funding cycle sensitivity
  • China market exposure

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs, IP / patents). Specialized, technically differentiated instruments with an installed base among research and clinical microbiology labs.

Headquarters: Billerica, Massachusetts, USA · Founded: 1960 · Employees: 11,085

Named competitors

Bruker at a glance

Size Bruker (BRKR) is a United States Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $9.34B, the 811th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $61.31 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 38.8%, against +27.0% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.6%); the operating margin is 9.3% (peer median 15.5%).

Valuation It trades at 26.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.7× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $2.78B at 30 Sep 2026, up 34% on a year earlier — 0.8 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 8.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026BRKR 142Peer median 128
Six months, rebased to 100: Bruker against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Bruker financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.51B$3.44B$3.37B$2.96B$2.53B
Revenue growth—+2%+14%+17%—
Gross profit$1.67B$1.64B$1.66B$1.52B$1.31B
EBITDA$557M$500M$564M$597M$548M
Net income-$123M-$8.60M$113M$427M$297M
Free cash flow$245M$43.3M$136M$243M$145M
Capital expenditure$97.1M$90.8M$115M$107M$129M
Total debt$1.71B$2.04B$2.25B$1.38B$1.27B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bruker competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%0%+10%+20%GMEDPODDBIOQGENAVTR68697701GETI-BDEMANTALGNCOOBLCO7733300832BIMCOHPENSNLNTHGKOSBRKR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bruker is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%20×40×GMEDPODDBIOQGENAVTR68697701GETI-BDEMANTALGNCOOBLCO7733300832BIMCOHPENGKOSBRKRRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bruker is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%GMEDPODDBIOQGENAVTR68697701GETI-BALGNCOOBLCO7733300832COHPENSNLNTHBRKRGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bruker is the large dot.

Bruker competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BRKR vs TMO vs A vs WAT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Bruker BRKR$9.34B+39%+2%9%26.2×25.7%
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO$257B+50%+8%19%25.8×20.9%
Agilent Technologies A$49.3B+51%+9%24%26.6×22.6%
Waters WAT$45.0B+29%+81%10%28.6×46.2%

How Bruker compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bruker against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBRKRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.8%+12.2%7th lowest of 21
6-month return+38.8%+27.0%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.1%-12.0%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.2%+4.6%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.3%15.5%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E26.2×19.7×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.7%8.9%3rd most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.6%+9.8%6th highest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.1 pp+0.9 pp4th most demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp+2.7 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA19.7×12.8×4th most expensive of 18
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×0.5×4th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bruker BRKRUnited States$9.34B+39%+2%9%26.2×25.7%+11.6%
Globus Medical GMEDUnited States$9.54B-9%+20%22%14.1×5.5%+30.1%
Insulet PODDUnited States$10.2B-5%+26%18%19.5×10.3%+24.5%
Bio-Rad Laboratories BIOUnited States$10.3B+50%+1%9%35.7×26.5%+0.3%
Qiagen QGENUnited States$10.4B+52%+3%25%19.8×8.8%+2.2%
Avantor AVTRUnited States$10.5B+86%+1%8%17.7×16.1%+0.5%
Sysmex 6869.TJapan$7.89B+50%+4%13%31.2×4.4%+10.4%
Shimadzu 7701.TJapan$7.79B+15%+6%13%19.5×6.3%+7.3%
Getinge GETI-B.STSweden$7.73B+45%-4%14%21.0×4.7%+3.2%
Demant A/S DEMANT.CODenmark$11.6B+62%+10%18%25.7×6.8%+9.8%
Align Technology ALGNUnited States$11.8B-2%+4%19%13.9×11.4%+10.3%
Cooper Companies (The) COOUnited States$11.9B+4%+5%19%13.8×9.4%+11.0%
Bausch + Lomb BLCO.TOCanada$7.20B+31%+11%9%17.3×11.0%+10.0%
Olympus 7733.TJapan$12.2B+13%+8%16%18.0×-1.5%+6.7%
Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering 300832.SZChina$7.11B+25%+7%43%25.5×2.1%+15.7%
bioMerieux BIM.PAFrance$12.4B+29%-3%15%20.9×8.9%+5.5%
Cochlear COH.AXAustralia$7.05B+55%-1%13%29.4×24.1%+9.3%
Penumbra PENUnited States$12.6B-1%+17%12%54.9×30.1%+20.2%
Smith & Nephew SN..LUnited Kingdom$13.1B+5%+2%17%14.4×11.1%+5.6%
Lantheus LNTHUnited States$6.57B+8%+2%19%17.5×-0.5%+35.3%
Glaukos GKOSUnited States$13.3B+68%+47%-9%155.4×n/an/a

Bruker backlog

Bruker reported $2.78B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 34% from a year earlier and flat from the previous quarter. That is 0.8 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.00.

Questions

Who are Bruker's main competitors?
Named competitors: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Agilent Technologies (A), Waters Corporation (WAT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Globus Medical (GMED), Insulet (PODD), Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO), Qiagen (QGEN), Avantor (AVTR), Sysmex (6869.T).
Is Bruker expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 26.2× against a peer median of 19.7×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Bruker stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +38.8% against +27.0% for the median peer; over one year +52.5%.
What is Bruker's backlog?
Bruker's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $2.78B at 30 Sep 2026, +34% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.