Loading…

Agilent TechnologiesACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Life-sciences and diagnostics company making analytical instruments (chromatography, mass spectrometry) and lab consumables/services.

Momentum leader 92
Mkt cap
$49.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$360M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
26.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.0 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
+17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
17 days
23 Nov 2026
Close · USD$174.76
1D+1.7%
1W-0.1%
1M+3.9%
3M+17.5%
6M+51.4%
YTD+29.2%
1Y+19.8%
ATR %3.0%
Beta0.92
52w lowhigh4.5% off high

What Agilent Technologies does

Life-sciences and diagnostics company making analytical instruments (chromatography, mass spectrometry) and lab consumables/services.

Sells instruments once, then earns recurring revenue from the consumables, service contracts and software that run on them; the CrossLab arm handles that follow-on work. Pharmaceutical and chemical labs are the biggest buyers. It was spun out of Hewlett-Packard in 1999 and separated its electronics test business as Keysight in 2014.

Products and services

  • Life Sciences & Applied Markets (chromatography, mass spec)
  • Diagnostics & Genomics
  • CrossLab (services/consumables)

Customers

  • Pharma/biotech companies
  • Academic/government labs
  • Environmental/food testing labs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Healthcare/Life Sciences
  • Life science tools
  • Analytical instruments and lab…

What could go right

  • Pharma/biopharma QA/QC instrument demand
  • CrossLab services attach growth

What could go wrong

  • Biotech/academic funding cycle sensitivity
  • China market softness

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs, brand). Large installed instrument base drives recurring consumables and service revenue.

Headquarters: Santa Clara, California, USA · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 18,100

Named competitors

Agilent Technologies at a glance

Size Agilent Technologies (A) is a United States Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $49.3B, the 255th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $174.76 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 51.4%, against +23.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 24.1% (peer median 20.2%).

Valuation It trades at 26.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.7× (11th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.0 points above its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $437M at 31 Oct 2025, up 7% on a year earlier — 0.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Agilent Technologies has 6 bonds outstanding ($3.65B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 62 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014016011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026A 157Peer median 126
Six months, rebased to 100: Agilent Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Agilent Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-10-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$7.37B$6.95B$6.51B$6.83B$6.85B
Revenue growth—+7%-5%0%—
Gross profit$3.96B$3.65B$3.56B$3.72B$3.69B
EBITDA$2.05B$1.85B$1.85B$1.90B$1.90B
Net income$1.44B$1.30B$1.29B$1.24B$1.25B
Free cash flow$1.27B$1.15B$1.37B$1.47B$1.02B
Capital expenditure$342M$407M$378M$298M$291M
Total debt$3.95B$3.54B$3.57B$2.90B$2.92B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Agilent Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+20%7741MDLNIDXXWATSHLBDXEWBSXALCGEHCMTD300760RMDILMNDXCMWSTDIMEL4543A6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Agilent Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%20×30×40×7741MDLNIDXXWATSHLBDXEWBSXALCGEHCMTD300760RMDILMNWSTDIMSTEEL4543ARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Agilent Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+10%+20%+30%10%20%30%7741MDLNIDXXWATSHLBDXEWBSXALCGEHCMTD300760RMDILMNDXCMWSTDIMSTEEL4543AGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Agilent Technologies is the large dot.

Agilent Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (A vs TMO vs DHR vs WAT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Agilent Technologies A$49.3B+51%+9%24%26.6×22.6%
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO$257B+50%+8%19%25.8×20.9%
Danaher DHR$162B+35%+6%21%25.3×20.5%
Waters WAT$45.0B+29%+81%10%28.6×46.2%
Shimadzu 7701.T$7.79B+15%+6%13%19.5×6.3%

How Agilent Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Agilent Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.9%+11.8%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+51.4%+23.9%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-4.5%-9.5%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.6%+8.6%11th highest of 21
Operating margin24.1%20.2%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E26.6×26.7×11th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.6%15.4%6th most demanding of 21
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.4%+9.7%2nd lowest of 21
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+17.2 pp+4.0 pp6th most demanding of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.0 pp+3.1 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA25.1×18.4×8th most expensive of 20
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.6×10th least indebted of 20
Bond spread62 bp77 bp2nd tightest of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Agilent Technologies AUnited States$49.3B+51%+9%24%26.6×22.6%+5.4%
Hoya 7741.TJapan$47.4B-23%+13%31%26.7×13.3%+11.6%
Medline MDLNUnited States$52.1B0%+12%6%26.1×17.1%+9.9%
Idexx Laboratories IDXXUnited States$53.3B+21%+12%32%41.5×28.0%+9.7%
Waters WATUnited States$45.0B+29%+81%10%28.6×46.2%+6.0%
Siemens Healthineers SHL.DEGermany$55.9B+31%-1%15%18.9×9.0%+10.1%
Becton Dickinson BDXUnited States$57.7B+43%-3%15%16.0×9.6%+6.3%
Edwards Lifesciences EWUnited States$58.9B+28%+15%29%31.4×17.2%+6.7%
Boston Scientific BSXUnited States$62.0B-21%+9%21%13.8×5.0%+15.2%
Alcon ALC.SWSwitzerland$37.5B+22%-1%11%21.4×12.9%+6.1%
GE HealthCare GEHCUnited States$37.2B+30%+7%14%15.4×4.3%+3.7%
Mettler Toledo MTDUnited States$34.5B+53%+7%28%33.9×20.3%+5.5%
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics 300760.SZChina$33.4B+9%+5%28%27.1×0.9%+9.7%
ResMed RMDUnited States$33.1B+14%+9%34%19.1×4.9%+12.1%
Illumina ILMNUnited States$32.2B+50%+6%21%35.7×27.1%+6.0%
Dexcom DXCMUnited States$29.6B+31%+13%24%27.0×18.5%+19.3%
West Pharmaceutical Services WSTUnited States$27.9B+23%+13%23%39.8×25.2%+7.5%
Sartorius Stedim Biotech DIM.PAFrance$24.7B+38%+4%19%45.5×33.1%+9.2%
Steris STEUnited States$24.6B+22%+8%20%21.4×13.7%+13.8%
EssilorLuxottica EL.PAFrance$101B+12%+8%12%26.6×19.4%+14.6%
Terumo 4543.TJapan$23.4B+25%+14%17%24.6×8.7%+13.0%

Agilent Technologies bonds and credit

Agilent Technologies has 6 bonds outstanding with $3.65B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 5.26%, a spread of 62 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Agilent Technologies backlog

Agilent Technologies reported $437M of remaining performance obligations at 31 Oct 2025, up 7% from a year earlier. That is 0.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are Agilent Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Danaher Corporation (DHR), Waters Corporation (WAT), Shimadzu Corporation (7701.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hoya (7741.T), Medline (MDLN), Idexx Laboratories (IDXX), Waters (WAT), Siemens Healthineers (SHL.DE), Becton Dickinson (BDX).
Is Agilent Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 26.6× against a peer median of 26.7×, 11th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Agilent Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +51.4% against +23.9% for the median peer; over one year +19.8%.
What is Agilent Technologies's backlog?
Agilent Technologies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $437M at 31 Oct 2025, +7% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.