Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1234.HK China Lilang Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

China Lilang Ltd.1234.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Consumer Discretionary›Apparel/Footwear
Momentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$406M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
29%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$83,451
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.3 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
126 days
12 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$2.66
1D-1.1%
1W+1.7%
1M-6.0%
3M-22.1%
6M-26.7%
YTD-20.6%
1Y-22.9%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh33.0% off high

What China Lilang does

Employees: 5,847

China Lilang at a glance

Size China Lilang (1234.HK) is a Hong Kong Consumer Discretionary company (Apparel/Footwear) with a market value of $406M, the 818th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$2.66 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.7%, against -22.5% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.8%); the operating margin is 11.6% (peer median 5.7%).

Valuation It trades at 4.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.6× (2nd cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.3 points above its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 781234.HK 74
Six months, rebased to 100: China Lilang against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China Lilang financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$4.92BHK$4.41BHK$3.96BHK$3.92BHK$3.59B
Revenue growth—+12%+1%+9%—
Gross profitHK$2.41BHK$2.18BHK$1.88BHK$1.88BHK$1.65B
EBITDAHK$894MHK$872MHK$802MHK$872MHK$785M
Net incomeHK$530MHK$545MHK$500MHK$586MHK$521M
Free cash flowHK$612MHK$526MHK$463MHK$1.04BHK$452M
Capital expenditureHK$144MHK$158MHK$134MHK$148MHK$442M
Total debtn/aHK$1.63BHK$1.75BHK$1.66BHK$819M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Lilang competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%003016300218603808600630093050RCKY219960027236080026879802007700002763MEKKOOXMLUXIND00239560513867681234.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Lilang is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%0×10×20×30×003016300218603808093050RCKY219936080026879802007700MEKKOOXMLUXIND00239567686035181234.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Lilang is the large dot.

China Lilang competitors and peer comparison

How China Lilang compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Lilang against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1234.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.0%-3.6%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-26.7%-22.5%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-33.0%-36.5%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.6%+0.8%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin11.6%5.7%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E4.8×12.6×2nd cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.3 pp+0.3 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA3.0×8.7×2nd cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×0.9×6th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Lilang 1234.HKHong Kong$406M-27%+21%12%4.8×n/an/a
Xin Hee 003016.SZChina$404M-24%+9%2%27.0×14.9%-4.2%
Anhui Anli Material Technology 300218.SZChina$402M-20%-3%3%27.0×25.1%+8.0%
Shenzhen Ellassay Fashion 603808.SSChina$401M-35%0%10%13.1×-15.0%+7.8%
Shanghai Dragon 600630.SSChina$420M-21%+9%2%n/a26.5%-10.9%
LF Corp. 093050.KSSouth Korea$426M-13%0%9%5.0×-12.5%+3.2%
Rocky Brands RCKYUnited States$387M+37%+11%10%12.6×10.6%+11.7%
Regina Miracle International (Holdings) 2199.HKHong Kong$386M+26%-2%8%5.8×-9.2%+5.3%
Shanghai Kaikai Industrial 600272.SSChina$386M+3%+1%3%n/a15.2%+8.2%
TSI 3608.TJapan$430M-11%+29%2%8.4×n/an/a
Zhejiang Giuseppe Garment 002687.SZChina$432M+18%-1%8%32.9×12.1%+3.0%
Fulgent Sun International (Holding) 9802.TWTaiwan$382M-22%+11%6%8.1×n/an/a
F&F 007700.KSSouth Korea$380M-31%+7%23%1.2×n/an/a
ShenZhen HuiJie 002763.SZChina$437M-24%-3%6%n/a-11.8%+4.9%
Marimekko MEKKO.HEFinland$437M-1%+2%16%15.2×-1.5%+8.9%
Oxford Industries OXMUnited States$440M-35%-2%3%13.0×11.6%+14.6%
Lux Industries LUXIND.NSIndia$370M-23%+4%5%23.5×n/an/a
Wuxi Double Elephant Micro Fibre Material 002395.SZChina$448M-45%-5%4%8.8×-0.1%+14.0%
Sunrise Manufacture 605138.SSChina$457M-29%+3%5%15.2×n/an/a
Sports Gear 6768.TWTaiwan$359M-26%-2%0%11.0×15.4%+8.6%
Jinhong Fashion 603518.SSChina$357M-30%-4%8%8.1×-5.8%+4.6%

Questions

Which companies are China Lilang's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Xin Hee (003016.SZ), Anhui Anli Material Technology (300218.SZ), Shenzhen Ellassay Fashion (603808.SS), Shanghai Dragon (600630.SS), LF Corp. (093050.KS), Rocky Brands (RCKY), Regina Miracle International (Holdings) (2199.HK), Shanghai Kaikai Industrial (600272.SS).
Is China Lilang expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.8× against a peer median of 12.6×, 2nd cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has China Lilang stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.7% against -22.5% for the median peer; over one year -22.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.