Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002992.SZ Shenzhen Baoming Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Baoming Technology Co., Ltd. Class A002992.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Makes LED backlight components for phones/laptops/vehicles, plus lithium-battery composite copper foil - two unrelated businesses, not a core chipmaker.

≈ A Chinese display-backlight and battery-materials maker spanning two unrelated segmentsMomentum neutral 55
Mkt cap
$887M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
47%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.5 pp
WACC 6.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥32.69
1D+3.8%
1W+18.5%
1M+1.8%
3M+1.7%
6M-37.7%
YTD-31.3%
1Y-38.1%
ATR %6.0%
52w lowhigh43.8% off high

What Shenzhen Baoming Technology does

Makes LED backlight components for phones/laptops/vehicles, plus lithium-battery composite copper foil - two unrelated businesses, not a core chipmaker.

Earns from two separate businesses: backlight units sold to display and device makers, and composite copper foil, a plastic film coated with copper, sold to battery makers as a lighter alternative to solid copper foil. Backlights are the older base, while the battery foil is a later expansion into a different industry.

In one line: A Chinese display-backlight and battery-materials maker spanning two unrelated segments.

Products and services

  • LED backlight units
  • MiniLED backlights
  • Lithium battery composite copper foil

Customers

  • Smartphone/laptop/vehicle display makers
  • Lithium battery makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Display components / battery materials
  • LED backlight + copper foil
  • Backlight modules and composite copper…

What could go right

  • MiniLED display adoption
  • EV/energy-storage battery demand

What could go wrong

  • Two unrelated, capital-intensive businesses diluting focus
  • Pricing pressure in both segments

Moat: none (scale). Operates in two competitive, capital-intensive component markets with limited differentiation.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Founded: 2006 · Employees: 1,834

Named competitors

Shenzhen Baoming Technology at a glance

Size Shenzhen Baoming Technology (002992.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $887M, the 2546th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥32.69 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.7%, against -15.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 20.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.7%); the operating margin is -0.7% (peer median 0.8%).

Valuation It trades at 5.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.4× (10th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.5 points below its cost of capital (6.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82002992.SZ 62
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Baoming Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Baoming Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.15BCN¥1.30BCN¥1.52BCN¥1.32BCN¥939M
Revenue growth—-14%+15%+41%—
Gross profitCN¥221MCN¥150MCN¥106MCN¥80.1M-CN¥14.6M
EBITDAn/aCN¥124MCN¥53.9MCN¥2,860-CN¥24.7M
Net income-CN¥15.5MCN¥11.9M-CN¥76.4M-CN¥124M-CN¥223M
Free cash flow-CN¥32.8MCN¥2.27M-CN¥20.0M-CN¥176M-CN¥144M
Capital expenditureCN¥91.3MCN¥107MCN¥122MCN¥93.8MCN¥210M
Total debtCN¥1.01BCN¥906MCN¥922MCN¥1.02BCN¥686M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Baoming Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%80166036853576AIP2388300042301647724966AMBQ688512535168838164566007700005416882300028602393002104002992.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Baoming Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×5×10×80166036853576AIP2388300042301647724966AMBQ68851253516883816456600770000541688230002104002992.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Baoming Technology is the large dot.

Shenzhen Baoming Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002992.SZ vs 002609.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Shenzhen Baoming Technology 002992.SZ$887M-38%-20%-1%5.8×n/a
Shenzhen Jieshun Science & Technology Industry 002609.SZ$683M-14%+5%3%2.4×1.9%

How Shenzhen Baoming Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Baoming Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002992.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.8%-17.1%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-37.7%-15.8%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.8%-41.7%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-20.3%+7.7%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-0.7%0.8%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales5.8×5.4×10th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.5 pp-4.6 pp10th highest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Baoming Technology 002992.SZChina$887M-38%-20%-1%5.8×n/an/a
Sitronix Technology 8016.TWTaiwan$894M+5%+18%13%1.0×-9.1%+6.6%
Zhejiang Chenfeng Science and Technology 603685.SSChina$896M-28%-14%4%6.9×n/an/a
United Renewable Energy 3576.TWTaiwan$876M+15%-43%-62%12.2×n/an/a
Arteris AIPUnited States$875M-44%+34%-44%9.0×55.4%+17.3%
VIA Technologies 2388.TWTaiwan$874M-35%-3%-12%2.5×17.9%+8.0%
Netac Technology 300042.SZChina$872M-44%+103%10%2.7×n/an/a
Episil-Precision 3016.TWTaiwan$865M-10%+30%14%5.8×40.5%-0.7%
Taiwan Speciality Chemicals 4772.TWOTaiwan$862M-38%+164%40%7.8×11.0%+36.7%
Parade Technologies 4966.TWOTaiwan$915M-31%-3%14%1.9×3.8%+1.6%
Ambiq Micro AMBQUnited States$933M-13%+32%-43%5.8×n/an/a
Smarter Microelectronics (Guangzhou) 688512.SSChina$835M-11%+43%-30%5.0×n/an/a
Etron Technology 5351.TWOTaiwan$835M+13%+246%21%2.6×3.3%+2.6%
Dioo Microcircuits Co., Ltd. Jiangsu 688381.SSChina$948M-15%-18%-46%11.1×n/an/a
General Interface Solution (GIS) 6456.TWTaiwan$824M0%-19%-3%0.3×n/an/a
Jiangsu Zongyi 600770.SSChina$961M-35%+64%-4%9.7×43.6%+4.7%
Foshan Electrical and Lighting 000541.SZChina$967M-8%-3%-2%1.1×n/an/a
Shanghai Prisemi Electronics 688230.SSChina$970M-23%+31%19%8.7×31.1%+1.3%
Hangzhou Star Shuaier Electric Appliance 002860.SZChina$810M+16%-14%7%2.5×19.8%+18.4%
Everlight Electronics 2393.TWTaiwan$807M-17%-3%10%0.8×-11.7%-1.9%
Hengbao 002104.SZChina$977M-35%-17%-9%8.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Shenzhen Baoming Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Elec-Tech International (002609.SZ), Nichia (private or unlisted), Battery copper-foil peers (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sitronix Technology (8016.TW), Zhejiang Chenfeng Science and Technology (603685.SS), United Renewable Energy (3576.TW), Arteris (AIP), VIA Technologies (2388.TW), Netac Technology (300042.SZ).
Is Shenzhen Baoming Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.8× against a peer median of 5.4×, 10th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Baoming Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.7% against -15.8% for the median peer; over one year -38.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.