Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000973.SZ FSPG Hi-Tech Co., Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

FSPG Hi-Tech Co., Ltd Class A000973.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Industrial Specialties

Foshan-based polymer-materials maker, controlled by Guangxin group, that bought Hebei Jinli in 2026 to become a lithium-battery separator supplier.

Momentum laggard 18
Mkt cap
$4.07B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
71%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$60.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
136 days
22 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥11.03
1D-2.2%
1W+6.7%
1M-7.1%
3M-8.7%
6M-47.5%
YTD-25.0%
1Y+47.1%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh50.4% off high

What FSPG Hi-Tech does

Foshan-based polymer-materials maker, controlled by Guangxin group, that bought Hebei Jinli in 2026 to become a lithium-battery separator supplier.

Controlled by Guangdong Guangxin Holdings, it made polymer films and materials until a restructuring brought in Hebei Jinli, a lithium-battery separator maker consolidated from February 2026. Separators, thin plastic membranes that keep a cell's electrodes apart, now carry the growth, while the older polymer-film business continues alongside.

Products and services

  • Lithium-battery separators (Hebei Jinli, consolidated from F
  • Advanced polymer films and materials (legacy business)

Customers

  • Lithium-battery cell makers
  • Packaging and industrial film users

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Polymer films and battery materials
  • Battery separators and functional films

What could go right

  • Battery separator demand from EV and storage cells
  • Integration of Jinli into the group

What could go wrong

  • Intense price competition in separators
  • Integration risk on an acquired business

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how). Separator manufacturing know-how and capacity added through Jinli; backed by a provincial state group.

Headquarters: Foshan, China · Employees: 2,888

Named competitors

FSPG Hi-Tech at a glance

Size FSPG Hi-Tech (000973.SZ) is a China Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $4.07B, the 628th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥11.03 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 47.5%, against -15.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 204.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.9%); the operating margin is 17.3% (peer median 11.1%).

Valuation It trades at 16.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 31.9× (2nd cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81000973.SZ 52
Six months, rebased to 100: FSPG Hi-Tech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

FSPG Hi-Tech financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥6.87BCN¥2.23BCN¥2.22BCN¥2.21BCN¥2.63B
Revenue growth—0%+1%-16%—
Gross profitCN¥2.68BCN¥416MCN¥476MCN¥468MCN¥525M
EBITDAn/aCN¥217MCN¥275MCN¥254MCN¥306M
Net incomeCN¥1.31BCN¥108MCN¥120MCN¥214MCN¥136M
Free cash flow-CN¥627M-CN¥171MCN¥28.4MCN¥41.7MCN¥133M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.58BCN¥361MCN¥208MCN¥299MCN¥75.0M
Total debtCN¥9.25BCN¥1.12BCN¥724MCN¥604MCN¥836M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

FSPG Hi-Tech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%002271AZZCSW2631300236300487601208601118180246136037371560HSCLWDFCFPEBERGEPAINT6036883800000973.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. FSPG Hi-Tech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%50×100×002271AZZCSW26313002363004876012086011181560HSCLBERGEPAINT603688000973.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. FSPG Hi-Tech is the large dot.

FSPG Hi-Tech competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (000973.SZ vs 002812.SZ vs 300568.SZ vs 002080.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
FSPG Hi-Tech 000973.SZ$4.07B-47%+205%17%16.5×n/a
Yunnan Energy New Material (Group) 002812.SZ$7.55B-38%+50%17%19.8×7.8%
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material 300568.SZ$2.80B-23%+45%10%27.4×n/a
Sinoma Science & Technology 002080.SZ$8.76B-40%+18%9%19.5×n/a
Cangzhou Mingzhu Plastic 002108.SZ$1.10B-28%+14%5%n/an/a
Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) 688567.SS$1.82B-29%-8%-10%n/a-0.9%

How FSPG Hi-Tech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

FSPG Hi-Tech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000973.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.1%-4.8%9th lowest of 20
6-month return-47.5%-15.3%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-50.4%-36.9%7th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+204.9%+11.9%highest of 21
Operating margin17.3%11.1%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E16.5×31.9×2nd cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.1 pp-1.1 pp6th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
FSPG Hi-Tech 000973.SZChina$4.07B-47%+205%17%16.5×n/an/a
Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technology 002271.SZChina$3.92B-27%+10%1%18.8×10.6%+5.0%
AZZ AZZUnited States$3.76B-15%+10%17%16.9×9.8%+14.5%
CSW Industrials CSWUnited States$4.43B0%+30%18%20.8×13.5%+20.9%
SICC 2631.HKHong Kong$4.61B-41%+27%-5%93.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Sinyang Semiconductor Materials 300236.SZChina$3.58B-20%+33%15%54.8×n/an/a
Sunresin New Materials 300487.SZChina$4.77B-2%+17%36%31.2×19.0%+24.7%
Sichuan EM Technology 601208.SSChina$4.88B-15%+23%7%51.1×44.5%+22.5%
China Hainan Rubber Industry 601118.SSChina$3.36B-27%-37%-3%104.6×2.9%+22.2%
Crown New Materials Techn Co L 001381.SZChina$3.33Bn/a+8%10%n/an/an/a
Taiwan Glass Industry 1802.TWTaiwan$5.08B-21%+12%12%16.7×n/an/a
Kansai Paint 4613.TJapan$3.23B+29%+3%8%19.1×2.3%+10.1%
SKSHU Paint 603737.SSChina$3.14B-33%0%4%29.5×27.7%+8.9%
Kinik 1560.TWTaiwan$3.04B+17%+19%19%35.7×34.8%+9.6%
Himadri Speciality Chemical HSCL.NSIndia$3.04B-8%+25%20%31.9×n/an/a
Flat Glass 601865.SSChina$3.03B-30%-23%-2%n/a8.2%+20.0%
WD-40 WDFCUnited States$2.97B+6%+11%16%33.9×2.2%+7.1%
Fuchs FPE.DEGermany$5.87B+21%+12%13%13.8×-4.4%+8.4%
Berger Paints India BERGEPAINT.NSIndia$5.90B-2%+5%12%41.5×38.5%+11.8%
Jiangsu Pacific Quartz 603688.SSChina$2.78B-38%+15%10%82.1×n/an/a
GCL Technology 3800.HKHong Kong$2.71B-30%+25%-22%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are FSPG Hi-Tech's main competitors?
Named competitors: Yunnan Energy New Material (002812.SZ), Shenzhen Senior Technology Material (300568.SZ), Sinoma Science & Technology (002080.SZ), Cangzhou Mingzhu Plastic (002108.SZ), Shanghai Energy New Materials (688567.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technology (002271.SZ), AZZ (AZZ), CSW Industrials (CSW), SICC (2631.HK), Shanghai Sinyang Semiconductor Materials (300236.SZ), Sunresin New Materials (300487.SZ).
Is FSPG Hi-Tech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.5× against a peer median of 31.9×, 2nd cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has FSPG Hi-Tech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -47.5% against -15.3% for the median peer; over one year +47.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.