Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000796.SZ Caissa Tourism Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Caissa Tourism Group Co., Ltd. Class A000796.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Services
Momentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$805M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-12.2 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥3.35
1D-0.6%
1W+6.7%
1M-2.3%
3M-14.1%
6M-35.7%
YTD-53.5%
1Y-45.9%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh60.2% off high

What Caissa Tourism does

Employees: 1,487

Caissa Tourism at a glance

Size Caissa Tourism (000796.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Services) with a market value of $805M, the 2745th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.35 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 35.7%, against -13.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 42.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.6%); the operating margin is -10.2% (peer median 13.1%).

Valuation It trades at 5.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.0× (5th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.2 points below its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 89000796.SZ 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Caissa Tourism against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Caissa Tourism financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥973MCN¥797MCN¥649MCN¥580MCN¥319M
Revenue growth—+23%+12%+82%—
Gross profitCN¥161MCN¥130MCN¥131MCN¥105MCN¥5.41M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥7.82M-CN¥31.7M-CN¥66.7M-CN¥454M
Net incomeCN¥34.7MCN¥28.0M-CN¥103MCN¥607M-CN¥1.02B
Free cash flow-CN¥129M-CN¥130M-CN¥181MCN¥393M-CN¥392M
Capital expenditureCN¥94.6MCN¥36.1MCN¥3.85MCN¥3.06MCN¥8.38M
Total debtCN¥302MCN¥220MCN¥250MCN¥302MCN¥1.49B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Caissa Tourism competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%MAD0308600593TRIP000888603402002638WEB002707600138TRNALVDMSATS002033APEIAFYAEDR18510020597085000796.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Caissa Tourism is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×5×10×MAD0308600593TRIP000888603402002638WEB002707600138TRNALVDMSATS002033APEIAFYAEDR1851002059000796.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Caissa Tourism is the large dot.

Caissa Tourism competitors and peer comparison

How Caissa Tourism compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Caissa Tourism against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000796.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.3%-1.4%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-35.7%-13.4%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-60.2%-35.3%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+42.1%+3.6%highest of 21
Operating margin-10.2%13.1%3rd lowest of 21
EV / Sales5.5×2.0×5th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.2 pp+4.7 pp3rd lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Caissa Tourism 000796.SZChina$805M-36%+42%-10%5.5×n/an/a
Mader MAD.AXAustralia$806M-29%+15%9%1.1×5.2%+26.9%
China Travel International Investment Hong Kong 0308.HKHong Kong$809M0%-7%11%1.9×5.4%+15.7%
Dalian Sunasia Tourism 600593.SSChina$793M+19%+5%32%12.0×n/an/a
TripAdvisor TRIPUnited States$820M-38%-4%5%0.5×-6.6%+25.6%
Emei Shan Tourism 000888.SZChina$789M-16%-8%15%3.9×3.2%+15.1%
Shaanxi Tourism Culture Industry 603402.SSChina$832M-36%-18%54%3.1×-15.9%+27.6%
Dongguan Kingsun Optoelectronic 002638.SZChina$849M-16%-24%-34%15.5×n/an/a
Webbeds WEB.AXAustralia$871M+45%+20%25%2.6×4.5%+50.3%
UTour 002707.SZChina$740M-15%-9%2%0.6×9.7%+33.8%
China CYTS Tours 600138.SSChina$737M-25%+15%3%1.0×1.5%+9.7%
Trainline TRN.LUnited Kingdom$887M-5%+1%27%2.0×-8.0%+46.5%
Voyageurs du Monde ALVDM.PAFrance$896M+28%+4%8%0.7×1.8%+46.3%
Sats SATS.OLNorway$937M+10%+5%18%2.6×-5.9%+10.6%
Lijiang Yulong Tourism 002033.SZChina$687M-12%+8%37%4.7×0.8%+14.8%
American Public Education APEIUnited States$682M-34%+4%10%0.9×0.4%+15.1%
Afya AFYAUnited States$960M-25%+17%32%1.9×-16.3%+23.2%
eDreams ODIGEO EDR.MCSpain$637M+59%-3%12%1.3×2.9%+44.2%
China Gingko Education 1851.HKHong Kong$629M+56%+14%38%10.9×5.9%+16.9%
Yunnan Tourism 002059.SZChina$606M-19%-24%-62%12.4×n/an/a
Curves 7085.TJapan$601M+27%+16%18%2.1×-0.7%+11.9%

Questions

Which companies are Caissa Tourism's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Mader (MAD.AX), China Travel International Investment Hong Kong (0308.HK), Dalian Sunasia Tourism (600593.SS), TripAdvisor (TRIP), Emei Shan Tourism (000888.SZ), Shaanxi Tourism Culture Industry (603402.SS), Dongguan Kingsun Optoelectronic (002638.SZ), Webbeds (WEB.AX).
Is Caissa Tourism expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 5.5× against a peer median of 2.0×, 5th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Caissa Tourism stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -35.7% against -13.4% for the median peer; over one year -45.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.