Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000537.SZ Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin Co., Ltd. Class A000537.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Tianjin company that shifted from real-estate development into investing in and operating wind and solar power plants.

≈ A Chinese developer pivoted into renewable power generationMomentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$2.19B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
37.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
179 days
4 May 2027
Close · CNYCN¥7.09
1D+0.3%
1W+5.0%
1M-4.3%
3M-10.0%
6M-28.3%
YTD-13.6%
1Y-20.9%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh48.5% off high

What Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin does

Tianjin company that shifted from real-estate development into investing in and operating wind and solar power plants.

Sells electricity from wind and solar farms to the grid at government-guided or market-linked prices, so income follows wind speed, sunshine and how much power the grid will take. Output from older projects may also earn state renewable-subsidy payments, which are often paid late.

In one line: A Chinese developer pivoted into renewable power generation.

Products and services

  • Wind power generation
  • Solar power generation
  • Legacy real estate assets

Customers

  • Regional power grid operators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real estate (legacy)
  • Renewable power generation
  • Wind and solar power plants

What could go right

  • China's renewable capacity build-out

What could go wrong

  • Feed-in-tariff/subsidy changes
  • Legacy real estate wind-down risk

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Built renewable project pipeline and grid-connection approvals are slow for new entrants to match.

Headquarters: Tianjin, China · Employees: 1,404

Named competitors

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin at a glance

Size Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin (000537.SZ) is a China Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $2.19B, the 1166th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥7.09 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.3%, against -5.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.2%); the operating margin is 31.2% (peer median 22.5%).

Valuation It trades at 37.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (2nd most expensive of 19).

Next results Next results expected around 4 May 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95000537.SZ 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥5.24BCN¥4.88BCN¥3.82BCN¥3.68BCN¥3.42B
Revenue growth—+28%+4%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥3.85BCN¥2.27BCN¥2.03BCN¥1.91BCN¥1.76B
EBITDAn/aCN¥4.22BCN¥3.11BCN¥2.98BCN¥2.79B
Net incomeCN¥362MCN¥801MCN¥1.01BCN¥920MCN¥634M
Free cash flow-CN¥2.96B-CN¥6.48B-CN¥19.2B-CN¥22.4B-CN¥8.15B
Capital expenditureCN¥7.62BCN¥11.4BCN¥21.0BCN¥24.9BCN¥3.11B
Total debtCN¥63.7BCN¥67.3BCN¥58.8BCN¥43.9BCN¥18.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%0014NMRK0010LUMOSREHUFV-A6098000620IRENWIHL8876ALTAHOMEFABG60006488486006752542MVCARG000537.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×20×40×60×0014NMRKLUMOHUFV-A000620IRENWIHLALTAHOMEFABG2542MVC000537.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin is the large dot.

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (000537.SZ vs 600163.SS vs 600905.SS vs 1798.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin 000537.SZ$2.19B-28%+13%31%37.3×n/a
Zhongmin Energy 600163.SS$1.49B-15%+18%49%15.5×-9.8%
China Three Gorges Renewables (Group) 600905.SS$14.7B-16%-8%17%39.8×n/a
China Datang Corp. Renewable Power 1798.HK$904M-42%-6%21%8.8×n/a

How Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000537.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.3%+1.4%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-28.3%-5.0%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-48.5%-22.9%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.4%+8.2%7th highest of 21
Operating margin31.2%22.5%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E37.3×13.0×2nd most expensive of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin 000537.SZChina$2.19B-28%+13%31%37.3×n/an/a
Hysan Development 0014.HKHong Kong$2.16B-20%-2%72%7.5×n/an/a
Newmark NMRKUnited States$2.16B-29%+16%7%6.1×n/an/a
Hang Lung 0010.HKHong Kong$2.14B-25%+9%53%n/an/an/a
Lumo Homes LUMO.HEFinland$2.14B-3%+1%59%15.8×n/an/a
Sirius Real Estate SRE.LUnited Kingdom$2.14B+1%+13%41%13.6×n/an/a
Hufvudstaden HUFV-A.STSweden$2.14B-5%-4%47%20.9×n/an/a
Country Garden Services 6098.HKHong Kong$2.13B-21%+11%4%7.0×n/an/a
Winnovation Culturaltainment Development Limited 000620.SZChina$2.12B-6%+14%-39%66.0×n/an/a
Investis IREN.SWSwitzerland$2.26B-2%+10%67%32.9×n/an/a
Wihlborgs Fastigheter WIHL.STSweden$2.28B-14%+7%70%10.8×n/an/a
Relo 8876.TJapan$2.30B+21%+7%20%15.5×n/an/a
Altarea SCA ALTA.PAFrance$2.05B-31%-20%9%9.9×n/an/a
Neinor Homes HOME.MCSpain$2.04B+10%+165%10%13.0×n/an/a
Fabege FABG.STSweden$2.02B-16%+27%59%14.7×n/an/a
Nanjing Gaoke 600064.SSChina$2.00B-4%+4%-18%5.8×n/an/a
Leopalace21 8848.TJapan$1.99B+52%+3%8%13.0×n/an/a
China Enterprise 600675.SSChina$1.98B-15%-35%4%n/an/an/a
Highwealth Construction 2542.TWTaiwan$2.42B-5%+111%25%4.3×n/an/a
Metrovacesa MVC.MCSpain$1.95B-5%+58%13%26.4×n/an/a
Argan ARG.PAFrance$1.95B+14%+5%78%11.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zhongmin Energy (600163.SS), China Three Gorges Renewables (600905.SS), Longyuan Power Group (private or unlisted), Datang International Renewable Power (1798.HK), Huaneng Renewables (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hysan Development (0014.HK), Newmark (NMRK), Hang Lung (0010.HK), Lumo Homes (LUMO.HE), Sirius Real Estate (SRE.L), Hufvudstaden (HUFV-A.ST).
Is Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 37.3× against a peer median of 13.0×, 2nd most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Green Development Electricity Group of Tianjin stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.3% against -5.0% for the median peer; over one year -20.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.