Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TWIN Twin Disc, incorporatedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Twin Disc, incorporatedTWINCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery
Momentum neutral 56
Mkt cap
$332M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
79%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.64M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.8 pp
WACC 7.0%
Hurdle
-6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · USD$22.85
1D-0.5%
1W-4.7%
1M-12.2%
3M-3.6%
6M+18.8%
YTD+37.0%
1Y+44.9%
ATR %6.2%
Beta1.40
52w lowhigh21.8% off high

What Twin Disc does

Employees: 1,087

Twin Disc at a glance

Size Twin Disc (TWIN) is a United States Industrials company (Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) with a market value of $332M, the 3026th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $22.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 18.8%, against -21.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.8%); the operating margin is 5.2% (peer median 6.8%).

Valuation It trades at 30.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.0× (most expensive of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points below its cost of capital (7.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 3.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026TWIN 124Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Twin Disc against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Twin Disc financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$390M$381M$341M$295M$277M
Revenue growth—+12%+15%+7%—
Gross profit$105M$103M$93.9M$76.1M$68.0M
EBITDA$33.8M$31.9M$26.4M$21.7M$21.4M
Net income$38.5M$27.1M-$697,000$11.0M$10.4M
Free cash flow$25.9M$9.19M$8.82M$25.0M$15.0M
Capital expenditure$16.1M$13.7M$15.2M$8.71M$7.92M
Total debt$59.3M$50.6M$55.5M$48.2M$36.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Twin Disc competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%301032300865002890001360300103TLGO60233008106289069363646753002535BTM7102301533688015603280TWIN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Twin Disc is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+5%+10%+15%10×20×30×6023VSTTILLERS628963646753688015TWINRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Twin Disc is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%301032300865VSTTILLERS628906937102688015603280TWINGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Twin Disc is the large dot.

Twin Disc competitors and peer comparison

How Twin Disc compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Twin Disc against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTWINPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-10.9%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+18.8%-21.5%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.8%-37.6%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.1%+8.8%8th highest of 21
Operating margin5.2%6.8%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E30.9×17.0×most expensive of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.7%8.5%4th least demanding of 9
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.8%-0.2%highest of 9
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.1 pp+8.7 pp3rd least demanding of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.8 pp-1.7 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA10.8×7.3×4th most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×0.4×5th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Twin Disc TWINUnited States$332M+19%+12%5%30.9×5.7%+11.8%
Zhejiang Xinchai 301032.SZChina$335M-28%+2%4%n/a7.9%-1.1%
Chengdu Dahongli Machinery 300865.SZChina$340M-22%+35%8%n/a25.4%-11.5%
Shandong Hongyu Precision Machinery 002890.SZChina$343M-21%-2%2%n/an/an/a
Nanchang Mineral Systems 001360.SZChina$344M-16%+12%4%n/an/an/a
Dagang 300103.SZChina$317M-19%-27%-58%n/an/an/a
Talgo TLGO.MCSpain$313M-21%+22%1%n/an/an/a
Daihatsu Infinearth Mfg.co.,ltd 6023.TJapan$357M-25%+11%10%7.6×n/an/a
Beijing Zhongkehaixun Digital S&T 300810.SZChina$359M-38%+35%-8%n/an/an/a
VST Tillers Tractors VSTTILLERS.NSIndia$359M-24%+17%11%24.8×27.3%+10.2%
Giken 6289.TJapan$302M+4%+8%11%18.8×9.0%+0.6%
Tan Chong International 0693.HKHong Kong$367M-2%-7%5%n/a-2.1%-0.5%
Airman 6364.TJapan$368M-1%+2%14%8.8×n/an/a
Lungteh Shipbuilding 6753.TWTaiwan$369M-28%+13%25%15.2×n/an/a
Linzhou Heavy Machinery 002535.SZChina$297M-30%-33%7%n/an/an/a
Penguin International BTM.SISingapore$297M+35%-5%19%n/an/an/a
Nippon Sharyo,Ltd 7102.TJapan$294M-14%+4%13%n/a-9.2%+0.1%
Weima Agricultural Machinery 301533.SZChina$383M-15%+20%7%n/an/an/a
Traffic Control Technology 688015.SSChina$383M-37%+10%7%18.8×-3.9%+4.5%
Anhui Tuoshan Heavy Industries 001226.SZChina$387M-28%+30%3%n/an/an/a
Fujian South Highway Machinery 603280.SSChina$399M-28%-3%5%n/a15.3%-2.0%

Questions

Which companies are Twin Disc's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Zhejiang Xinchai (301032.SZ), Chengdu Dahongli Machinery (300865.SZ), Shandong Hongyu Precision Machinery (002890.SZ), Nanchang Mineral Systems (001360.SZ), Dagang (300103.SZ), Talgo (TLGO.MC), Daihatsu Infinearth Mfg.co.,ltd (6023.T), Beijing Zhongkehaixun Digital S&T (300810.SZ).
Is Twin Disc expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.9× against a peer median of 17.0×, most expensive of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Twin Disc stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +18.8% against -21.5% for the median peer; over one year +44.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.