Loading…

Tuas Ltd.TUA.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Communication Services›Wireless Telecommunications
Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$555M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.39M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.0 pp
WACC 11.7%
Hurdle
-45 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · AUDA$1.46
1D+1.7%
1W+14.5%
1M-11.8%
3M-32.4%
6M-74.7%
YTD-79.3%
1Y-79.3%
ATR %7.6%
52w lowhigh81.3% off high

What Tuas does

No business profile yet.

Tuas at a glance

Size Tuas (TUA.AX) is an Australia Communication Services company (Wireless Telecommunications) with a market value of $555M, the 247th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$1.46 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 74.7%, against -8.7% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.5%); the operating margin is 11.9% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 23.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.2× (3rd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +44%, so the hurdle is -45 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.0 points below its cost of capital (11.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 91TUA.AX 25
Six months, rebased to 100: Tuas against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Tuas financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-07-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$214MA$214MA$177MA$132MA$94.3M
Revenue growth—+21%+34%+41%—
Gross profitA$49.7MA$49.7MA$37.4MA$17.7MA$2.29M
EBITDAA$95.7MA$95.7MA$80.2MA$56.3MA$34.1M
Net incomeA$29.3MA$29.7MA$8.09M-A$4.95M-A$16.8M
Free cash flowA$58.3MA$60.1MA$31.7MA$16.0M-A$3.75M
Capital expenditureA$43.5MA$44.8MA$64.5MA$54.3MA$48.8M
Total debtn/aA$538,996A$1.24MA$1.71MA$2.23M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tuas competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-75%-50%-25%0%+25%0%+50%GOGO03150215300959ATEX9436TUA.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tuas is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%+30%20×40×GOGO0315021594169436TUA.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tuas is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%031502153009599416ATEX9436TUA.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tuas is the large dot.

Tuas competitors and peer comparison

How Tuas compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tuas against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTUA.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.8%-1.7%3rd lowest of 9
6-month return-74.7%-8.7%lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-81.3%-26.7%lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.6%+12.5%3rd highest of 9
Operating margin11.9%8.9%4th highest of 9
Forward P/E23.9×21.2×3rd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.1%-5.5%3rd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+44.5%+3.4%2nd highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-44.5 pp-8.8 ppleast demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.0 pp-1.7 pp4th lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA2.6×6.5×3rd cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-5.8×0.1×least indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Tuas TUA.AXAustralia$555M-75%+21%12%23.9×-0.1%+44.5%
Gogo GOGOUnited States$526M-12%+30%12%35.3×n/an/a
SmarTone Telecommunications 0315.HKHong Kong$663M-9%+6%11%9.2×-17.5%-0.3%
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong 0215.HKHong Kong$679M-9%+23%0%55.2×-7.2%+3.7%
Wuxi Online Offline Communication Information Technology 300959.SZChina$808M-29%-50%-12%n/a21.5%-12.1%
Vision, Inc. ( Japan) 9416.TJapan$310M-9%+6%17%9.7×-15.5%+18.6%
Anterix ATEXUnited States$1.46B+33%+19%-579%n/a45.3%+47.8%
Okinawa Cellular Telephone 9436.TJapan$1.90B-3%+5%24%21.2×-3.7%+3.1%
Digi Spain Telecom, S.A. Unipersonal DIGIS.MCSpain$2.16Bn/a+19%6%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Tuas's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Gogo (GOGO), SmarTone Telecommunications (0315.HK), Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong (0215.HK), Wuxi Online Offline Communication Information Technology (300959.SZ), Vision, Inc. ( Japan) (9416.T), Anterix (ATEX), Okinawa Cellular Telephone (9436.T), Digi Spain Telecom, S.A. Unipersonal (DIGIS.MC).
Is Tuas expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.9× against a peer median of 21.2×, 3rd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +44%, so the hurdle is -45 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tuas stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -74.7% against -8.7% for the median peer; over one year -79.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.