Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SJ.TO Stella-Jones Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Stella-Jones Inc.SJ.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Forest Products

Manufactures pressure-treated wood products, mainly railway ties and utility poles, for railroads and utilities in North America.

≈ A treated wood products manufacturer for rail/utility infrastructureMomentum weak 35
Mkt cap
$2.56B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.98M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
124 days
10 Mar 2027
Close · CADC$65.85
1D+1.3%
1W-1.7%
1M+2.5%
3M-14.1%
6M-11.5%
YTD-22.6%
1Y-20.6%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh35.0% off high

What Stella-Jones does

Manufactures pressure-treated wood products, mainly railway ties and utility poles, for railroads and utilities in North America.

Buys wood, treats it with preservatives at its plants and sells the poles and ties to railroads and power utilities, partly under long-term supply agreements, so earnings depend on the spread between wood costs and selling prices. The 2017 purchase of Koppers' utility-pole and railroad-tie business expanded its plant network.

In one line: A treated wood products manufacturer for rail/utility infrastructure.

Products and services

  • Railway ties
  • Utility poles
  • Residential lumber (treated wood)

Customers

  • Class I railroads
  • Electric/telecom utilities

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Wood products manufacturing
  • Pressure-treated wood processing
  • Railway tie/utility pole supply

What could go right

  • Rail infrastructure replacement demand
  • Utility grid infrastructure/pole replacement demand

What could go wrong

  • Timber/wood input cost volatility
  • Railroad/utility capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (installed base, customer qualification, scale). Long-term railroad/utility supply contracts and a large North American plant network are hard for smaller producers to match.

Headquarters: Montreal, Canada · Founded: 1918 · Employees: 3,200

Named competitors

Stella-Jones at a glance

Size Stella-Jones (SJ.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Forest Products) with a market value of $2.56B, the 170th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$65.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.5%, against +0.3% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.9%); the operating margin is 12.7% (peer median 4.5%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 26.0× (cheapest of 10).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 100SJ.TO 92
Six months, rebased to 100: Stella-Jones against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

Stella-Jones financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$3.52BC$3.49BC$3.47BC$3.32BC$3.06B
Revenue growth—+1%+5%+8%—
Gross profitC$652MC$689MC$709MC$673MC$509M
EBITDAC$599MC$637MC$648MC$616MC$456M
Net incomeC$259MC$337MC$319MC$326MC$241M
Free cash flowC$493MC$454MC$276M-C$48.0MC$158M
Capital expenditureC$103MC$112MC$143MC$165MC$108M
Total debtC$1.65BC$1.64BC$1.70BC$1.61BC$1.11B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Stella-Jones competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%000592002043UFPI603226LPXWFGCFPTREXINWI1377002631002785600189301356SJ.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Stella-Jones is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%50×100×002043UFPILPXTREXINWI1377002785600189301356SJ.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Stella-Jones is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%000592002043UFPILPXTREXINWI13776001895930301356SJ.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Stella-Jones is the large dot.

Stella-Jones competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SJ.TO vs KOP)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Stella-Jones SJ.TO$2.56B-12%+2%13%11.8×-9.1%
Koppers KOP$567M-32%-5%10%6.7×-7.1%

How Stella-Jones compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Stella-Jones against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSJ.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.5%+2.0%8th highest of 16
6-month return-11.5%+0.3%4th lowest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-35.0%-24.9%5th lowest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.9%+1.9%8th highest of 16
Operating margin12.7%4.5%2nd highest of 16
Forward P/E11.8×26.0×cheapest of 10
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.1%13.3%2nd least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.5%+5.0%3rd highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.6 pp+10.4 pp2nd least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.1 pp-6.4 pp3rd highest of 16
EV / EBITDA8.4×9.0×3rd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA2.5×0.4×2nd most indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Stella-Jones SJ.TOCanada$2.56B-12%+2%13%11.8×-9.1%+6.5%
Zhongfu Straits (Pingtan) Development 000592.SZChina$1.93B-38%-29%-37%n/a25.3%+1.5%
Dehua TB New Decoration Material 002043.SZChina$1.60B-10%+4%9%15.2×-1.3%+6.6%
UFP Industries UFPIUnited States$4.41B-5%-1%5%17.7×9.9%+4.2%
Vohringer Home Technology 603226.SSChina$1.30B-38%-3%-40%n/an/an/a
Louisiana-Pacific LPXUnited States$5.27B0%-12%5%34.9×39.1%-0.6%
West Fraser Timber WFG.TOCanada$5.35B+12%-8%-11%n/an/an/a
Canfor CFP.TOCanada$1.22B+17%+2%-1%n/an/an/a
Trex TREXUnited States$5.58B+36%+9%19%26.9×21.1%+5.9%
Inwido INWI.STSweden$1.16B+39%+11%10%16.9×2.5%+6.1%
Sakata Seed 1377.TJapan$1.13B+2%+12%11%16.2×0.2%+8.5%
Der Future Science & Technology 002631.SZChina$1.04B+10%-26%-23%n/an/an/a
XIAMEN WANLI STONE STOCK 002785.SZChina$1.03B-40%-33%-7%47.6×n/an/a
Jilin Quanyangquan 600189.SSChina$897M+1%+9%11%109.0×16.6%-1.7%
Bunka Shutter 5930.TJapan$779M-1%+3%6%n/a-12.9%+6.4%
Zhejiang Tianzhen Technology 301356.SZChina$713M-7%+2%4%26.0×27.5%-7.1%

Questions

Who are Stella-Jones's main competitors?
Named competitors: Koppers Holdings (KOP). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zhongfu Straits (Pingtan) Development (000592.SZ), Dehua TB New Decoration Material (002043.SZ), UFP Industries (UFPI), Vohringer Home Technology (603226.SS), Louisiana-Pacific (LPX), West Fraser Timber (WFG.TO).
Is Stella-Jones expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 26.0×, cheapest of 10 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Stella-Jones stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.5% against +0.3% for the median peer; over one year -20.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.