Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LPX Louisiana-Pacific CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Louisiana-Pacific CorporationLPXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Forest Products

Makes engineered wood building products — oriented strand board (OSB) and siding — for homebuilders and repair/remodel.

Momentum strong 69
Mkt cap
$5.27B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$107M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
34.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-7.7 pp
WACC 12.7%
Hurdle
+40 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · USD$75.36
1D-2.1%
1W+2.8%
1M+15.8%
3M+1.3%
6M+0.3%
YTD-6.7%
1Y-3.6%
ATR %4.1%
Beta1.08
52w lowhigh24.9% off high

What Louisiana-Pacific does

Makes engineered wood building products — oriented strand board (OSB) and siding — for homebuilders and repair/remodel.

Sells OSB, a structural wood panel, at prices that swing with housing demand and mill supply, so it is the main swing factor in profit, while siding under the SmartSide name sells at steadier, branded prices to dealers and builders. Over recent years it has deliberately grown the siding side to rely less on OSB's cycle.

Products and services

  • Oriented strand board (OSB)
  • Engineered wood siding (SmartSide)
  • Structural framing products

Customers

  • Homebuilders
  • Building materials distributors/dealers
  • Repair and remodel contractors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Engineered wood products manufacturing
  • Homebuilding/repair-remodel supply…

What could go right

  • Housing starts/repair-remodel demand
  • Siding share gains from vinyl/wood

What could go wrong

  • OSB commodity price cyclicality
  • Housing market cyclicality

Moat: narrow (scale, brand). Manufacturing scale and the SmartSide siding brand give cost and product differentiation versus commodity OSB competitors.

Headquarters: Nashville, Tennessee, US · Founded: 1972 · Employees: 4,300

Named competitors

Louisiana-Pacific at a glance

Size Louisiana-Pacific (LPX) is a United States Materials company (Forest Products) with a market value of $5.27B, the 1150th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $75.36 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.3%, against -7.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 11.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.6%); the operating margin is 4.7% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 34.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.5× (most expensive of 5).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 39% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +40 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.7 points below its cost of capital (12.7% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 12.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LPX 103Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Louisiana-Pacific against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Louisiana-Pacific financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.50B$2.71B$2.94B$2.58B$3.85B
Revenue growth—-8%+14%-33%—
Gross profit$430M$585M$828M$596M$1.50B
EBITDA$270M$405M$666M$462M$1.37B
Net income$67.0M$146M$420M$178M$928M
Free cash flow$30.0M$91.0M$422M-$64.0M$730M
Capital expenditure$251M$291M$183M$380M$414M
Total debt$377M$379M$380M$378M$395M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Louisiana-Pacific competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%WFGTREXUFPISJ000592002043LPX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Louisiana-Pacific is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%-5%0%+5%+10%10×20×30×TREXUFPISJ002043LPXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Louisiana-Pacific is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%TREXUFPISJ000592002043LPXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Louisiana-Pacific is the large dot.

Louisiana-Pacific competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LPX vs WFG vs WY vs JHX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Louisiana-Pacific LPX$5.27B0%-12%5%34.9×39.1%
West Fraser Timber WFG$5.17B+10%-10%-11%n/an/a
Weyerhaeuser WY$15.1B-10%-1%6%86.1×n/a
James Hardie Industries JHX$16.2B+33%+43%14%21.0×26.1%
Boise Cascade BCC$2.44B-1%+1%3%24.1×7.7%
UFP Industries UFPI$4.41B-5%-1%5%17.7×9.9%

How Louisiana-Pacific compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Louisiana-Pacific against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLPXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+15.8%+5.3%2nd highest of 7
6-month return+0.3%-7.5%3rd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-24.9%-29.3%3rd highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)-11.6%+0.6%2nd lowest of 7
Operating margin4.7%6.6%4th highest of 7
Forward P/E34.9×16.5×most expensive of 5
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)39.1%9.9%most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)-0.6%+5.9%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+39.6 pp+5.7 ppmost demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-7.7 pp+1.1 pp3rd lowest of 7
EV / EBITDA19.9×8.9×most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA0.4×0.6×2nd least indebted of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Louisiana-Pacific LPXUnited States$5.27B0%-12%5%34.9×39.1%-0.6%
West Fraser Timber WFG.TOCanada$5.35B+12%-8%-11%n/an/an/a
Trex TREXUnited States$5.58B+36%+9%19%26.9×21.1%+5.9%
UFP Industries UFPIUnited States$4.41B-5%-1%5%17.7×9.9%+4.2%
Stella-Jones SJ.TOCanada$2.56B-12%+2%13%11.8×-9.1%+6.5%
Zhongfu Straits (Pingtan) Development 000592.SZChina$1.93B-38%-29%-37%n/a25.3%+1.5%
Dehua TB New Decoration Material 002043.SZChina$1.60B-10%+4%9%15.2×-1.3%+6.6%

Questions

Who are Louisiana-Pacific's main competitors?
Named competitors: West Fraser Timber (WFG), Weyerhaeuser (WY), James Hardie Industries (JHX), Boise Cascade (BCC), UFP Industries (UFPI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes West Fraser Timber (WFG.TO), Trex (TREX), UFP Industries (UFPI), Stella-Jones (SJ.TO), Zhongfu Straits (Pingtan) Development (000592.SZ), Dehua TB New Decoration Material (002043.SZ).
Is Louisiana-Pacific expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 34.9× against a peer median of 16.5×, most expensive of 5 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 39% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -1%, so the hurdle is +40 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Louisiana-Pacific stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.3% against -7.5% for the median peer; over one year -3.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.