Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SENS Senseonics Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Senseonics Holdings, Inc.SENSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Electronic Components
Momentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$454M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.40M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 9.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · USD$8.59
1D+7.5%
1W-9.7%
1M-4.8%
3M+13.9%
6M+70.8%
YTD+55.6%
1Y+27.6%
ATR %7.5%
Beta2.37
52w lowhigh19.3% off high

What Senseonics does

Employees: 130

Senseonics at a glance

Size Senseonics (SENS) is a United States Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $454M, the 2767th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $8.59 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 70.8%, against -34.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 90.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +18.4%); the operating margin is -223.2% (peer median 1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 7.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.9× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Short interest Short interest is 9.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SENS 149Peer median 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Senseonics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Senseonics financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$48.5M$35.3M$22.5M$22.4M$16.4M
Revenue growth—+57%0%+37%—
Gross profit$26.6M$15.8M$533,000$3.09M$2.73M
EBITDA-$107M-$66.8M-$73.4M-$74.3M-$67.6M
Net income-$109M-$69.1M-$78.6M-$60.4M$142M
Free cash flow-$97.2M-$60.7M-$62.7M-$70.5M-$66.6M
Capital expenditure$886,000$1.12M$2.24M$350,000$312,000
Total debt$62.8M$41.4M$61.1M$47.8M$75.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Senseonics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%68829154393568604172006052583010413526TTG688391LPTH8155644908566030003200067033626880101263406782603633SENS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Senseonics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%2.5×5×7.5×68829154393568604172006052583010413526TTG688391LPTH81550856603000320006703362688010126340603633SENSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Senseonics is the large dot.

Senseonics competitors and peer comparison

How Senseonics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Senseonics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSENSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.8%-21.5%5th highest of 21
6-month return+70.8%-34.2%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-19.3%-53.7%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+90.6%+18.4%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin-223.2%1.3%lowest of 21
EV / Sales7.7×2.9×2nd most expensive of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Senseonics SENSUnited States$454M+71%+91%-223%7.7×n/an/a
Beijing JCZ Technology 688291.SSChina$452M-30%+12%1%9.7×n/an/a
First Hi-tec Enterprise 5439.TWOTaiwan$458M-60%+93%17%1.4×-5.0%+31.1%
TLB 356860.KSSouth Korea$460M-34%+43%13%2.0×n/an/a
LS Materials 417200.KSSouth Korea$442M-70%+20%0%3.6×n/an/a
Jiangsu Xiehe Electronic 605258.SSChina$476M-2%+1%7%3.1×8.6%+9.7%
Shenzhen King Brother Electronics Technology 301041.SZChina$430M-10%+18%5%3.1×22.5%+3.9%
Alltop Technology 3526.TWOTaiwan$428M-40%+19%31%2.8×-7.5%+12.9%
TT Electronics TTG.LUnited Kingdom$419M+50%-3%7%0.8×9.9%+2.2%
Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) 688391.SSChina$418M-23%+4%-4%2.6×4.9%+7.3%
LightPath Technologies LPTHUnited States$495M-39%+93%-2%5.9×n/an/a
Allied Circuit 8155.TWOTaiwan$416M-52%+33%14%2.2×n/an/a
APAQ Technology 6449.TWTaiwan$414M-13%+23%18%3.0×n/an/a
CHA Biotech 085660.KSSouth Korea$499M-57%+14%-6%1.3×n/an/a
Jinlong Machinery & Electronic 300032.SZChina$411M-35%-18%-4%2.0×12.4%-2.0%
Youngpoong 000670.KSSouth Korea$406M-54%+40%-2%0.3×-14.5%-1.8%
Ability Opto-Electronics Technology 3362.TWOTaiwan$513M+6%-3%-8%5.1×n/an/a
Fujian Forecam Optics 688010.SSChina$518M-35%-2%-15%5.8×n/an/a
Vinatech Co 126340.KSSouth Korea$395M-56%+66%2%6.0×n/an/a
Visco Vision 6782.TWTaiwan$523M+23%+23%29%3.6×n/an/a
Shanghai Laimu Electronics 603633.SSChina$394M-26%+2%-12%2.6×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Senseonics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Beijing JCZ Technology (688291.SS), First Hi-tec Enterprise (5439.TWO), TLB (356860.KS), LS Materials (417200.KS), Jiangsu Xiehe Electronic (605258.SS), Shenzhen King Brother Electronics Technology (301041.SZ), Alltop Technology (3526.TWO), TT Electronics (TTG.L).
Is Senseonics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 7.7× against a peer median of 2.9×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Senseonics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +70.8% against -34.2% for the median peer; over one year +27.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.