Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 126340.KS Vinatech Co,. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Vinatech Co,. Ltd.126340.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Electronic Components
Momentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$395M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
67%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-6.8 pp
WACC 7.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩76,600
1D-1.7%
1W-18.7%
1M-19.1%
3M+20.4%
6M-56.4%
YTD+6.5%
1Y+50.3%
ATR %14.6%
52w lowhigh62.5% off high

What Vinatech Co does

Employees: 203

Vinatech Co at a glance

Size Vinatech Co (126340.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $395M, the 397th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩76,600 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 56.4%, against -18.0% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 66.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.8%); the operating margin is 2.0% (peer median 6.9%).

Valuation It trades at 6.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.0× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.8 points below its cost of capital (7.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

25507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 83126340.KS 41
Six months, rebased to 100: Vinatech Co against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Vinatech Co financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩107B₩82.2B₩59.6B₩55.0B₩70.7B
Revenue growth—+38%+8%-22%—
Gross profit₩27.6B₩24.0B₩17.9B₩17.1B₩21.6B
EBITDA₩14.2B₩12.1B-₩1.17B₩8.45B₩14.1B
Net income-₩40.5B-₩5.85B-₩9.09B₩1.98B₩11.7B
Free cash flow-₩69.0B-₩25.5B-₩48.3B₩610M-₩12.5B
Capital expenditure₩40.7B₩19.6B₩45.2B₩12.6B₩24.0B
Total debt₩127B₩116B₩113B₩56.7B₩64.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Vinatech Co competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-40%-20%0%6036332478MEI000670300032305564498155688391TTG301329025540130035263010414927620969084771PACT126340.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Vinatech Co is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×2×4×6×6036332478MEI000670300032305564498155TTG301329025540130035263010414927620969084771126340.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Vinatech Co is the large dot.

Vinatech Co competitors and peer comparison

How Vinatech Co compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Vinatech Co against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure126340.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-19.1%-20.2%11th highest of 21
6-month return-56.4%-18.0%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-62.5%-47.4%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+66.0%+8.8%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin2.0%6.9%8th lowest of 21
EV / Sales6.0×2.0×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.8 pp-0.4 pp7th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA45.4×8.6×most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA7.8×0.3×3rd most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Vinatech Co 126340.KSSouth Korea$395M-56%+66%2%6.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Laimu Electronics 603633.SSChina$394M-26%+2%-12%2.6×n/an/a
Ta-I Technology 2478.TWTaiwan$388M+16%+8%14%2.1×13.2%+0.1%
Methode Electronics MEIUnited States$384M+12%+1%1%0.6×n/an/a
Youngpoong 000670.KSSouth Korea$406M-54%+40%-2%0.3×-14.5%-1.8%
Jinlong Machinery & Electronic 300032.SZChina$411M-35%-18%-4%2.0×12.4%-2.0%
Spirox 3055.TWTaiwan$377M+47%+4%-55%27.7×n/an/a
APAQ Technology 6449.TWTaiwan$414M-13%+23%18%3.0×n/an/a
Allied Circuit 8155.TWOTaiwan$416M-52%+33%14%2.2×n/an/a
Hi-Trend Technology (Shanghai) 688391.SSChina$418M-23%+4%-4%2.6×4.9%+7.3%
TT Electronics TTG.LUnited Kingdom$419M+50%-3%7%0.8×9.9%+2.2%
Singatron Electronic (China) 301329.SZChina$372M-35%+37%5%1.7×n/an/a
Korea Electric Terminal 025540.KSSouth Korea$369M-45%-4%8%0.2×n/an/a
Trigiant 1300.HKHong Kong$368M-1%+26%12%1.1×-13.0%-2.4%
Alltop Technology 3526.TWOTaiwan$428M-40%+19%31%2.8×-7.5%+12.9%
Shenzhen King Brother Electronics Technology 301041.SZChina$430M-10%+18%5%3.1×22.5%+3.9%
Apex International 4927.TWTaiwan$359M-24%-10%-22%1.8×n/an/a
Kinko Optical 6209.TWTaiwan$359M-5%+67%11%2.6×n/an/a
IRISO Electronics 6908.TJapan$359M-28%+10%9%0.6×-7.6%+11.1%
Vizionfocus 4771.TWTaiwan$355M+8%+26%29%3.2×n/an/a
Proact IT PACT.STSweden$354M+8%+4%7%0.7×-5.8%+5.2%

Questions

Which companies are Vinatech Co's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shanghai Laimu Electronics (603633.SS), Ta-I Technology (2478.TW), Methode Electronics (MEI), Youngpoong (000670.KS), Jinlong Machinery & Electronic (300032.SZ), Spirox (3055.TW), APAQ Technology (6449.TW), Allied Circuit (8155.TWO).
Is Vinatech Co expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.0× against a peer median of 2.0×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Vinatech Co stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -56.4% against -18.0% for the median peer; over one year +50.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.